Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: how societies mind the gap - PubMed (original) (raw)

doi: 10.1111/bjso.12005. Epub 2012 Oct 5.

Susan T Fiske, Nicolas Kervyn, Amy J C Cuddy, Adebowale Debo Akande, Bolanle E Adetoun, Modupe F Adewuyi, Magdeline M Tserere, Ananthi Al Ramiah, Khairul Anwar Mastor, Fiona Kate Barlow, Gregory Bonn, Romin W Tafarodi, Janine Bosak, Ed Cairns, Claire Doherty, Dora Capozza, Anjana Chandran, Xenia Chryssochoou, Tilemachos Iatridis, Juan Manuel Contreras, Rui Costa-Lopes, Roberto González, Janet I Lewis, Gerald Tushabe, Jacques-Philippe Leyens, Renée Mayorga, Nadim N Rouhana, Vanessa Smith Castro, Rolando Perez, Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón, Miguel Moya, Elena Morales Marente, Marisol Palacios Gálvez, Chris G Sibley, Frank Asbrock, Chiara C Storari

Affiliations

Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: how societies mind the gap

Federica Durante et al. Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Income inequality undermines societies: The more inequality, the more health problems, social tensions, and the lower social mobility, trust, life expectancy. Given people's tendency to legitimate existing social arrangements, the stereotype content model (SCM) argues that ambivalence-perceiving many groups as either warm or competent, but not both-may help maintain socio-economic disparities. The association between stereotype ambivalence and income inequality in 37 cross-national samples from Europe, the Americas, Oceania, Asia, and Africa investigates how groups' overall warmth-competence, status-competence, and competition-warmth correlations vary across societies, and whether these variations associate with income inequality (Gini index). More unequal societies report more ambivalent stereotypes, whereas more equal ones dislike competitive groups and do not necessarily respect them as competent. Unequal societies may need ambivalence for system stability: Income inequality compensates groups with partially positive social images.

© 2012 The British Psychological Society.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Mexican sample, four-cluster solution. Key: Stars indicate cluster centers. H and L, respectively, indicate high, and low; W, warmth; C, competence. The term “fresas” refers to rich, spoiled kids.

Figure 2

Figure 2

European Australian sample, five-cluster solution. Key: Stars indicate cluster centers. H, M and L, respectively, indicate high, medium, and low; W, warmth; C, competence.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Gini coefficients and Warmth-Competence (W-C) Fisher standardized correlations, all samples.

References

    1. Abele AE, Wojciszke B. Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;93:751–763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakan D. The duality of human existence. An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1966.
    1. Brandolini A, Smeeding TM. Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic economics – ITALY; 2007. Inequality patterns in Western-type democracies: Cross-country differences and time changes. Retrieved from http://www.child-centre.unito.it/papers/child08_2007.pdf.
    1. Brandt MJ. Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science. 2011;22:1413–1418. doi: 10.1177/0956797611420445. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Becker JC, Wright SC. Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;101:62–77. doi: 10.1037/a0022615. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources