Facilitating responsible gambling: the relative effectiveness of education-based animation and monetary limit setting pop-up messages among electronic gaming machine players - PubMed (original) (raw)

Randomized Controlled Trial

Facilitating responsible gambling: the relative effectiveness of education-based animation and monetary limit setting pop-up messages among electronic gaming machine players

Michael J A Wohl et al. J Gambl Stud. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Although most gamblers set a monetary limit on their play, many exceed this limit--an antecedent of problematic gambling. Responsible gambling tools may assist players to gamble within their means. Historically, however, the impact of such tools has been assessed in isolation. In the current research, two responsible gambling tools that target adherence to a monetary limit were assessed among 72 electronic gaming machine (EGM) players. Participants watched an educational animation explaining how EGMs work (or a neutral video) and then played an EGM in a virtual reality environment. All participants were asked to set a monetary limit on their play, but only half were reminded when that limit was reached. Results showed that both the animation and pop-up limit reminder helped gamblers stay within their preset monetary limit; however, an interaction qualified these main effects. Among participants who did not experience the pop-up reminder, those who watched the animation stayed within their preset monetary limits more than those who did not watch the animation. For those who were reminded of their limit, however, there was no difference in limit adherence between those who watched the animation and those who did not watch the animation. From a responsible gambling perspective, the current study suggests that there is no additive effect of exposure to both responsible gambling tools. Therefore, for minimal disruption in play, a pop-up message reminding gamblers of their preset monetary limit might be preferred over the lengthier educational animation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Adherence to pre-set monetary limit (in percentage) by animation and pop-up reminder conditions

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
    1. Barnes GM, Welte JW, Hoffman JH, Tidwell MCO. Comparisons of gambling and alcohol use among college students and non-college young people in the U.S. Journal of American College Health. 2010;58:443–452. doi: 10.1080/07448480903540499. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blaszczynski A, Ladouceur R, Shaffer HJ. A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2004;20:301–317. doi: 10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040281.49444.e2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blaszczynski A, Nower L. A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction. 2002;97:487–499. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown, A., & Newby-Clark, I. R. (2005). Self-regulation and problem gambling. Final report submitted for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources