Stress "deafness" in a Language with Fixed Word Stress: An ERP Study on Polish - PubMed (original) (raw)
Stress "deafness" in a Language with Fixed Word Stress: An ERP Study on Polish
Ulrike Domahs et al. Front Psychol. 2012.
Abstract
The aim of the present contribution was to examine the factors influencing the prosodic processing in a language with predictable word stress. For Polish, a language with fixed penultimate stress but several well-defined exceptions, difficulties in the processing and representation of prosodic information have been reported (e.g., Peperkamp and Dupoux, 2002). The present study utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the factors influencing prosodic processing in Polish. These factors are (i) the predictability of stress and (ii) the prosodic structure in terms of metrical feet. Polish native speakers were presented with correctly and incorrectly stressed Polish words and instructed to judge the correctness of the perceived stress patterns. For some stress violations, an early negativity was found which was interpreted as a reflection of an error-detection mechanism. In addition, exceptional stress patterns (=antepenultimate stress) and post-lexical (=initial) stress evoked a task-related positivity effect (P300) whose amplitude and latency is correlated with the degree of anomaly and deviation from an expectation. In contrast, violations involving the default (=penultimate stress) did not produce such an effect. This asymmetrical result is interpreted to reflect that Polish native speakers are less sensitive to the default pattern than to the exceptional or post-lexical patterns. Behavioral results are orthogonal to the electrophysiological results showing that Polish speakers had difficulties to reject any kind of stress violation. Thus, on a meta-linguistic level Polish speakers appeared to be stress-"deaf" for any kind of stress manipulation, whereas the neural reactions differentiate between the default and lexicalized patterns.
Keywords: P300; generalized error-detection mechanism; prosodic representation; stress “deafness,” fixed stress system.
Figures
Figure 1
Trial scheme.
Figure 2
Descriptive means of incorrect responses (A) for words with canonical antepenultimate stress and (C) for words with canonical penultimate stress and probability of incorrect responses as predicted by the mixed effects regression models (B) for words with canonical antepenultimate stress and (D) for words with canonical penultimate stress.
Figure 3
EEG plots for stimuli with correct penultimate stress (solid line) and with shifts to initial syllable (dotted line) and to antepenultimate syllable (dashed line). Electrode cap schemes by Marius’t Hart, permission granted by the author.
Figure 4
EEG plots for stimuli with correct antepenultimate stress (solid line) and with shifts to initial syllable (dotted line) and to penultimate syllable (dashed line). Time from target onset is plotted on the _x_-axis, and amplitude is plotted on the _y_-axis (negativity upwards).
Similar articles
- Revisiting Stress "Deafness" in European Portuguese - A Behavioral and ERP Study.
Lu S, Vigário M, Correia S, Jerónimo R, Frota S. Lu S, et al. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 10;9:2486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02486. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30618927 Free PMC article. - The role of predictability and structure in word stress processing: an ERP study on Cairene Arabic and a cross-linguistic comparison.
Domahs U, Knaus JA, El Shanawany H, Wiese R. Domahs U, et al. Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 21;5:1151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01151. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25374546 Free PMC article. - Perceptual Correlates of Turkish Word Stress and Their Contribution to Automatic Lexical Access: Evidence from Early ERP Components.
Zora H, Heldner M, Schwarz IC. Zora H, et al. Front Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;10:7. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00007. eCollection 2016. Front Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 26834534 Free PMC article. - Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
Eckstein K, Friederici AD. Eckstein K, et al. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):130-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.003. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 15967649 - Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.
Kakouros S, Salminen N, Räsänen O. Kakouros S, et al. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jan 31;109:181-199. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 14. Neuropsychologia. 2018. PMID: 29247667
Cited by
- ERP evidence for Slavic and German word stress cue sensitivity in English.
Ivanova M, Neubert CR, Schmied J, Bendixen A. Ivanova M, et al. Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 23;14:1193822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193822. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37425183 Free PMC article. - Electrophysiological Differentiation of the Effects of Stress and Accent on Lexical Integration in Highly Fluent Bilinguals.
Lewendon J, Foltz A, Thierry G. Lewendon J, et al. Brain Sci. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):113. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10020113. Brain Sci. 2020. PMID: 32093267 Free PMC article. - Revisiting Stress "Deafness" in European Portuguese - A Behavioral and ERP Study.
Lu S, Vigário M, Correia S, Jerónimo R, Frota S. Lu S, et al. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 10;9:2486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02486. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30618927 Free PMC article. - Auditory-Motor Rhythms and Speech Processing in French and German Listeners.
Falk S, Volpi-Moncorger C, Dalla Bella S. Falk S, et al. Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 11;8:395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00395. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28443036 Free PMC article. - Processing word prosody-behavioral and neuroimaging evidence for heterogeneous performance in a language with variable stress.
Heisterueber M, Klein E, Willmes K, Heim S, Domahs F. Heisterueber M, et al. Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 29;5:365. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00365. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24808879 Free PMC article.
References
- Abecasis D., Brochard R., Granot R., Drake C. (2005). Differential brain response to metrical accents in isochronous auditory sequences. Music Percept. 22, 549–56210.1525/mp.2005.22.3.549 - DOI
- Baayen R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Baayen R. H., Davidson D. J., Bates D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 390–41210.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 - DOI
- Bajerowa I. (2001). “Polish language of the 20th centrury,” in Contemporary Polish language, ed. Bartminski J. (Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej; ), 23–48
- Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. (2011). lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. R package version 0.999375-42. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous