Osteochondral tissue engineering: current strategies and challenges - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Osteochondral tissue engineering: current strategies and challenges
Syam P Nukavarapu et al. Biotechnol Adv. 2013 Sep-Oct.
Abstract
Osteochondral defect management and repair remain a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery. Osteochondral defects contain damage to both the articular cartilage as well as the underlying subchondral bone. In order to repair an osteochondral defect the needs of the bone, cartilage and the bone-cartilage interface must be taken into account. Current clinical treatments for the repair of osteochondral defects have only been palliative, not curative. Tissue engineering has emerged as a potential alternative as it can be effectively used to regenerate bone, cartilage and the bone-cartilage interface. Several scaffold strategies, such as single phase, layered, and recently graded structures have been developed and evaluated for osteochondral defect repair. Also, as a potential cell source, tissue specific cells and progenitor cells are widely studied in cell culture models, as well with the osteochondral scaffolds in vitro and in vivo. Novel factor strategies being developed, including single factor, multi-factor, or controlled factor release in a graded fashion, not only assist bone and cartilage regeneration, but also establish osteochondral interface formation. The field of tissue engineering has made great strides, however further research needs to be carried out to make this strategy a clinical reality. In this review, we summarize current tissue engineering strategies, including scaffold design, bioreactor use, as well as cell and factor based approaches and recent developments for osteochondral defect repair. In addition, we discuss various challenges that need to be addressed in years to come.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
- Perspectives in multiphasic osteochondral tissue engineering.
Jeon JE, Vaquette C, Klein TJ, Hutmacher DW. Jeon JE, et al. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2014 Jan;297(1):26-35. doi: 10.1002/ar.22795. Epub 2013 Dec 2. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2014. PMID: 24293311 Review. - Repair and regeneration of osteochondral defects in the articular joints.
Swieszkowski W, Tuan BH, Kurzydlowski KJ, Hutmacher DW. Swieszkowski W, et al. Biomol Eng. 2007 Nov;24(5):489-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bioeng.2007.07.014. Epub 2007 Aug 7. Biomol Eng. 2007. PMID: 17931965 Review. - Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for osteochondral tissue-engineering applications: Scaffold design and its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells.
Oliveira JM, Rodrigues MT, Silva SS, Malafaya PB, Gomes ME, Viegas CA, Dias IR, Azevedo JT, Mano JF, Reis RL. Oliveira JM, et al. Biomaterials. 2006 Dec;27(36):6123-37. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.034. Epub 2006 Aug 30. Biomaterials. 2006. PMID: 16945410 - Evaluation of an extracellular matrix-derived acellular biphasic scaffold/cell construct in the repair of a large articular high-load-bearing osteochondral defect in a canine model.
Yang Q, Peng J, Lu SB, Guo QY, Zhao B, Zhang L, Wang AY, Xu WJ, Xia Q, Ma XL, Hu YC, Xu BS. Yang Q, et al. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Dec;124(23):3930-8. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011. PMID: 22340321 - In vivo evaluation of 3-dimensional polycaprolactone scaffolds for cartilage repair in rabbits.
Martinez-Diaz S, Garcia-Giralt N, Lebourg M, Gómez-Tejedor JA, Vila G, Caceres E, Benito P, Pradas MM, Nogues X, Ribelles JL, Monllau JC. Martinez-Diaz S, et al. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):509-19. doi: 10.1177/0363546509352448. Epub 2010 Jan 21. Am J Sports Med. 2010. PMID: 20093424
Cited by
- Characterization of Collagen Type I and II Blended Hydrogels for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering.
Vázquez-Portalatı N N, Kilmer CE, Panitch A, Liu JC. Vázquez-Portalatı N N, et al. Biomacromolecules. 2016 Oct 10;17(10):3145-3152. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00684. Epub 2016 Sep 19. Biomacromolecules. 2016. PMID: 27585034 Free PMC article. - Characterization and Cytotoxicity Evaluation of a Marine Sponge Biosilica.
Gabbai-Armelin PR, Kido HW, Cruz MA, Prado JPS, Avanzi IR, Custódio MR, Renno ACM, Granito RN. Gabbai-Armelin PR, et al. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2019 Feb;21(1):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s10126-018-9858-9. Epub 2018 Nov 16. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2019. PMID: 30443837 - Biomimetic porous silk fibroin/biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold for bone tissue regeneration.
Liu B, Gao X, Sun Z, Fang Q, Geng X, Zhang H, Wang G, Dou Y, Hu P, Zhu K, Wang D, Xing J, Liu D, Zhang M, Li R. Liu B, et al. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018 Dec 19;30(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s10856-018-6208-4. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018. PMID: 30569403 - Acrylamide-based hydrogels with distinct osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation potential.
Younus ZM, Roach P, Forsyth NR. Younus ZM, et al. Prog Biomater. 2022 Sep;11(3):297-309. doi: 10.1007/s40204-022-00196-5. Epub 2022 Jul 16. Prog Biomater. 2022. PMID: 35840792 Free PMC article. - MicroRNAs are potential prognostic and therapeutic targets in diabetic osteoarthritis.
Jingsheng S, Yibing W, Jun X, Siqun W, Jianguo W, Feiyan C, Gangyong H, Jie C. Jingsheng S, et al. J Bone Miner Metab. 2015 Jan;33(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00774-014-0628-0. Epub 2014 Sep 23. J Bone Miner Metab. 2015. PMID: 25245120 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources