Self-administration of cocaine induces dopamine-independent self-administration of sigma agonists - PubMed (original) (raw)
Self-administration of cocaine induces dopamine-independent self-administration of sigma agonists
Takato Hiranita et al. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Mar.
Abstract
Sigma(1) receptors (σ(1)Rs) are intracellularly mobile chaperone proteins implicated in several disease processes, as well as psychiatric disorders and substance abuse. Here we report that although selective σ(1)R agonists (PRE-084, (+)-pentazocine) lacked reinforcing effects in drug-naive rats, over the course of 28 experimental sessions, which was more than sufficient for acquisition of cocaine self-administration, responding was not maintained by either σ(1)R agonist. In contrast, after subjects self-administered cocaine σ(1)R agonists were readily self-administered. The induced reinforcing effects were long lasting; a response for which subjects had no history of reinforcement was newly conditioned with both σ(1)R agonists, extinguished when injections were discontinued, and reconditioned when σ(1)R agonists again followed responses. Experience with food reinforcement was ineffective as an inducer of σ(1)R agonist reinforcement. Although a variety of dopamine receptor antagonists blocked cocaine self-administration, consistent with its dopaminergic mechanism, PRE-084 self-administration was entirely insensitive to these drugs. Conversely, the σR antagonist, BD1063, blocked PRE-084 self-administration but was inactive against cocaine. In microdialysis studies i.v. PRE-084 did not significantly stimulate dopamine at doses that were self-administered in rats either with or without a cocaine self-administration experience. The results indicate that cocaine experience induces reinforcing effects of previously inactive σ(1)R agonists, and that the mechanism underlying these reinforcing effects is dopamine independent. It is further suggested that induced σ(1)R mechanisms may have an essential role in treatment-resistant stimulant abuse, suggesting new approaches for the development of effective medications for stimulant abuse.
Figures
Figure 1
Lack of the reinforcing effects of the selective _σ_1R agonists in experimentally naive rats compared with the typical acquisition of lever pressing with cocaine injections. (a) When each response on the right lever produced a cocaine injection rates of responding increased whereas rates of responding on the alternate (left) lever, which had no scheduled consequences, remained low. When cocaine injections were available only for responses on the previously inactive (left) lever, responding switched to that lever. Saline substitution decreased responding on both levers to low levels. When cocaine was again available for responses on the left lever, responding increased on that lever. (b, c) Lack of acquisition of (+)-pentazocine or PRE-084 self-administration when each response produced an injection. Response rates on the active lever were not consistently greater than those on the inactive lever throughout the course of 28 experimental sessions. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, compared with responding on the inactive lever (_post_-hoc Bonferroni _t_-test).
Figure 2
Substitution of cocaine resulted in the acquisition of self-administration in rats that did not self-administer _σ_1R agonists. (a, b) Acquisition of cocaine (0.32 mg/kg/injection) self-administration when each response produced an injection after extended exposure to PRE-084 (0.32 mg/kg/injection) or after exposure to (+)-pentazocine (0.32 mg/kg/injection). Each point represents the mean ±SEM of six subjects. ***p<0.001, compared with responding on the inactive lever (_post_-hoc Bonferroni _t_-test). (c) Examples of actual self-administration performances of a representative subject in real time. Ordinates, cumulative responses; abscissae, time. Each record is from a single 120-min experimental session. Each response on the active lever incrementally stepped the cumulative curve upward and produced a diagonal mark on the cumulative response curve. Vertical marks on the line below the cumulative curve indicate responses on the left (inactive) lever. The first record is from a previously naive subject in the last session with the opportunity to self-administer 0.32 mg/kg/injection of PRE-084. The second record is from that same subject after 14 sessions with the opportunity to self-administer 0.32 mg/kg/injection of cocaine. The third record is from the immediately following session, the first opportunity to self-administer 0.32 mg/kg/injection of PRE-084 after experience with cocaine. The last record shows stable self-administration of PRE-084.
Figure 3
Selective _σ_1R agonist self-administration after cocaine experience, but not after experience with food reinforcement. Each point represents the mean ±SEM. (a, b) Self-administration of selective _σ_1R agonists when each response produced an injection. Reversal of active and inactive levers, extinction, and reacquisition each had the effects expected for a reinforcing agent. (c) Dose–effect curve for PRE-084 self-administration before and after experience with cocaine self-administration. No dose of PRE-084 was self-administered at rates greater than those for saline in cocaine-naive rats. Following cocaine self-administration, the dose–effect curve of PRE-084 self-administration was typical of those obtained with traditional drugs of abuse. (d) A food reinforcement history was not sufficient to induce reinforcing effects of PRE-084. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, compared with responding on the inactive lever (_post_-hoc Bonferroni _t_-test). (e) Performances of a representative subject in real time (details of recording as in figure 2c). The first record is from the last session of responding maintained by food reinforcement. The second record is from the immediately following session, the first opportunity to self-administer 0.32 mg/kg/injection of PRE-084 after experience with food reinforcement, showing the extinction of responding previously maintained by food reinforcement. The 10th sessions confirm no acquisition of PRE-084 self-administration.
Figure 4
Sensitivity of cocaine self-administration, and insensitivity of PRE-084 self-administration to dopamine receptor antagonism. Rats were trained to self-administer cocaine (0.032–1.0 mg/kg/injection) under a fixed-ratio five-response schedule of reinforcement with different doses of cocaine available in five components. All antagonists except BD1063 (5 min before sessions) were administered intraperitoneally, 30 min before sessions. Each point represents the mean±SEM of response rates on the active lever. (a–c) Effects of antagonists selective for dopamine D1-like receptors, SCH 39166, D2-like receptors, L-741 626, and the combination of minimally active doses of each. SCH 39166 and L-741 626 shifted the cocaine self-administration dose–effect curve rightward and the combination produced an insurmountable antagonism over the range of tested doses of cocaine. (d) The non-selective dopamine receptor antagonist, haloperidol, produced a dose-related rightward shift in the cocaine self-administration dose–effect curve. (e) The _σ_1R antagonist, BD1063, did not substantially affect cocaine self-administration. (f–h) The dopamine antagonists and their combination did not substantially affect PRE-084 self-administration. (i) Haloperidol dose-dependently decreased maximal PRE-084 self-administration. (j) BD1063 dose-dependently decreased maximal PRE-084 self-administration.
Figure 5
Dose-dependent effects of PRE-084 on extracellular levels of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens shell. Ordinates: extracellular dopamine levels as a percentage of baseline during the 30-min period of time after cumulative drug administration. Abscissae: dose of drug in mg/kg, log scale. Each point represents the mean effect ±SEM determined in four rats. The average basal dopamine values in 10 μl samples of dialysates from the nucleus accumbens shell were 16.2 ±1.46 fmoles (±SEM) and 29.7±2.79 for rats, respectively, with and without cocaine experience, which did not significantly differ in the two groups (_t_=−2.12; _p_=0.08).
Similar articles
- Stimulants as specific inducers of dopamine-independent σ agonist self-administration in rats.
Hiranita T, Soto PL, Tanda G, Kopajtic TA, Katz JL. Hiranita T, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013 Oct;347(1):20-9. doi: 10.1124/jpet.113.207522. Epub 2013 Aug 1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013. PMID: 23908387 Free PMC article. - Blockade of Cocaine or σ Receptor Agonist Self Administration by Subtype-Selective σ Receptor Antagonists.
Katz JL, Hiranita T, Kopajtic TA, Rice KC, Mesangeau C, Narayanan S, Abdelazeem AH, McCurdy CR. Katz JL, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016 Jul;358(1):109-24. doi: 10.1124/jpet.116.232728. Epub 2016 Apr 21. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016. PMID: 27189970 Free PMC article. - Reinforcing effects of sigma-receptor agonists in rats trained to self-administer cocaine.
Hiranita T, Soto PL, Tanda G, Katz JL. Hiranita T, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010 Feb;332(2):515-24. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.159236. Epub 2009 Nov 5. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010. PMID: 19892920 Free PMC article. - A role for sigma receptors in stimulant self-administration and addiction.
Katz JL, Hong WC, Hiranita T, Su TP. Katz JL, et al. Behav Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;27(2-3 Spec Issue):100-15. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000209. Behav Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 26650253 Free PMC article. Review. - A Role for Sigma Receptors in Stimulant Self-Administration and Addiction.
Katz JL, Hiranita T, Hong WC, Job MO, McCurdy CR. Katz JL, et al. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2017;244:177-218. doi: 10.1007/164_2016_94. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2017. PMID: 28110353 Review.
Cited by
- The Sigma-1 Receptor: When Adaptive Regulation of Cell Electrical Activity Contributes to Stimulant Addiction and Cancer.
Soriani O, Kourrich S. Soriani O, et al. Front Neurosci. 2019 Nov 12;13:1186. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01186. eCollection 2019. Front Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31780884 Free PMC article. Review. - A Sigma1 Receptor Agonist Alters Fluidity and Stability of Lipid Monolayers.
Nakahara H, Hiranita T, Shibata O. Nakahara H, et al. Langmuir. 2024 Mar 26;40(12):6484-6492. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00053. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Langmuir. 2024. PMID: 38470245 Free PMC article. - Identification of the Sigma-2 Receptor: Distinct from the Progesterone Receptor Membrane Component 1 (PGRMC1).
Hiranita T. Hiranita T. J Alcohol Drug Depend. 2016;4:doi:10.4172/2329-6488.1000e130. doi: 10.4172/2329-6488.1000e130. Epub 2016 Apr 25. J Alcohol Drug Depend. 2016. PMID: 27376101 Free PMC article. No abstract available. - The sigma-1 receptor as a regulator of dopamine neurotransmission: A potential therapeutic target for methamphetamine addiction.
Sambo DO, Lebowitz JJ, Khoshbouei H. Sambo DO, et al. Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jun;186:152-167. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Pharmacol Ther. 2018. PMID: 29360540 Free PMC article. Review. - Stimulants as specific inducers of dopamine-independent σ agonist self-administration in rats.
Hiranita T, Soto PL, Tanda G, Kopajtic TA, Katz JL. Hiranita T, et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013 Oct;347(1):20-9. doi: 10.1124/jpet.113.207522. Epub 2013 Aug 1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2013. PMID: 23908387 Free PMC article.
References
- Aydar E, Palmer CP, Klyachko VA, Jackson MB. The sigma receptor as a ligand-regulated auxiliary potassium channel subunit. Neuron. 2002;34:399–410. - PubMed
- Barrett AC, Miller JR, Dohrmann JM, Caine SB. Effects of dopamine indirect agonists and selective D1-like and D2-like agonists and antagonists on cocaine self-administration and food maintained responding in rats. Neuropharmacology. 2004;47 (Suppl 1:256–273. - PubMed
- Barrett JE. Behavioral history as a determinant of the effects of d-amphetamine on punished behavior. Science. 1977;198:67–69. - PubMed
- Collins GT, Woods JH. Drug and reinforcement history as determinants of the response-maintaining effects of quinpirole in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;323:599–605. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources