Human Factors Engineering in HI: So What? Who Cares? and What's in It for You? - PubMed (original) (raw)

Human Factors Engineering in HI: So What? Who Cares? and What's in It for You?

Peter L Elkin. Healthc Inform Res. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Human factors engineering is a discipline that deals with computer and human systems and processes and provides a methodology for designing and evaluating systems as they interact with human beings. This review article reviews important current and past efforts in human factors engineering in health informatics in the context of the current trends in health informatics.

Methods: The methodology of human factors engineering and usability testing in particular were reviewed in this article.

Results: This methodology arises from the field of human factors engineering, which uses principles from cognitive science and applies them to implementations such as a computer-human interface and user-centered design.

Conclusions: Patient safety and best practice of medicine requires a partnership between patients, clinicians and computer systems that serve to improve the quality and safety of patient care. People approach work and problems with their own knowledge base and set of past experiences and their ability to use systems properly and with low error rates are directly related to the usability as well as the utility of computer systems. Unusable systems have been responsible for medical error and patient harm and have even led to the death of patients and increased mortality rates. Electronic Health Record and Computerized Physician Order Entry systems like any medical device should come with a known safety profile that minimizes medical error and harm. This review article reviews important current and past efforts in human factors engineering in health informatics in the context of the current trends in health informatics.

Keywords: Health Informatics; Human Factors Engineering; Patient Safety; Usability Testing; User-Centered Design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Some attributes of usefulness, as elucidated by bench testing. Here we depict the axes of usability. These depictions serve to emphasize the goals and challenges to the design of a well-formed Web (hypertext) environment.

Figure 2

Figure 2

This is a typical layout for an evaluation laboratory used for user interface and software evaluation. Recording and monitoring equipment is managed from the control room. There are cameras and microphones in the "lab" which capture the computer screen as well as the participant's actions and verbal observations. The lab (as noted in the diagram above) is where each participant would sit in front of a computer, at a desk configuration similar to his or her normal work environment, and performed the scenarios outlined in the methods section. To avoid bias, developers typically "observe" from an observation room, and do not themselves participate in the usability studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, Abaluck B, Localio AR, Kimmel SE, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1197–1203. - PubMed
    1. Koppel R. Monitoring and evaluating the use of electronic health records. JAMA. 2010;303(19):1918. - PubMed
    1. Nohr C, Sorensen M, Kushniruk A. Method for testing a CPOE system in the medication process in a cardiology ward. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 1):183–187. - PubMed
    1. Aarts J, Nohr C. From safe systems to patient safety. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;157:1–3. - PubMed
    1. Beuscart-Zephir MC, Elkin P, Pelayo S. Human factors engineering for clinical applications. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;124:685–690. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources