Comparison of the Biofire FilmArray RP, Genmark eSensor RVP, Luminex xTAG RVPv1, and Luminex xTAG RVP fast multiplex assays for detection of respiratory viruses - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 2013 May;51(5):1528-33.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.03368-12. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
Affiliations
- PMID: 23486707
- PMCID: PMC3647947
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03368-12
Comparative Study
Comparison of the Biofire FilmArray RP, Genmark eSensor RVP, Luminex xTAG RVPv1, and Luminex xTAG RVP fast multiplex assays for detection of respiratory viruses
Elena B Popowitch et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 May.
Abstract
There are several U.S. FDA-cleared molecular respiratory virus panels available today, each with advantages and disadvantages. This study compares four multiplex panels, the BioFire Diagnostics FilmArray RP (respiratory panel), the GenMark Dx eSensor RVP (respiratory viral panel), the Luminex xTAG RVPv1, and the Luminex xTAG RVP fast. Three hundred specimens (200 retrospective and 100 consecutive) were tested using all four platforms to determine performance characteristics. The overall sensitivity and specificity, respectively, and 95% confidence interval (CI; in parentheses) for each panel were as follows: FilmArray RP, 84.5% (79.2, 88.6) and 100% (96.2, 100); eSensor RVP, 98.3% (95.5, 99.5) and 99.2% (95.4, 100); xTAG RVPv1, 92.7% (88.5, 95.4) and 99.8% (96.0, 100); and xTAG RVP fast, 84.4% (78.5, 88.9) and 99.9% (96.1, 100). The sensitivity of each assay fluctuated by viral target, with the greatest discrepancies noted for adenovirus and influenza virus B detection. Hands-on time and time to result were recorded and ease of use was assessed to generate a complete profile of each assay.
Similar articles
- Comparative Performance of the Luminex NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel, GenMark eSensor Respiratory Viral Panel, and BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel.
Popowitch EB, Kaplan S, Wu Z, Tang YW, Miller MB. Popowitch EB, et al. Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0124822. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01248-22. Epub 2022 Jun 29. Microbiol Spectr. 2022. PMID: 35766513 Free PMC article. - Comparison of the Luminex xTAG RVP Fast assay and the Idaho Technology FilmArray RP assay for detection of respiratory viruses in pediatric patients at a cancer hospital.
Babady NE, Mead P, Stiles J, Brennan C, Li H, Shuptar S, Stratton CW, Tang YW, Kamboj M. Babady NE, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Jul;50(7):2282-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06186-11. Epub 2012 Apr 18. J Clin Microbiol. 2012. PMID: 22518855 Free PMC article. - Comparison of the Luminex xTAG respiratory viral panel with xTAG respiratory viral panel fast for diagnosis of respiratory virus infections.
Pabbaraju K, Wong S, Tokaryk KL, Fonseca K, Drews SJ. Pabbaraju K, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2011 May;49(5):1738-44. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02090-10. Epub 2011 Mar 16. J Clin Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21411570 Free PMC article. - The FilmArray® respiratory panel: an automated, broadly multiplexed molecular test for the rapid and accurate detection of respiratory pathogens.
Babady NE. Babady NE. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013 Nov;13(8):779-88. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2013.848794. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013. PMID: 24151847 Free PMC article. Review. - Multiplex PCR system for the rapid diagnosis of respiratory virus infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Huang HS, Tsai CL, Chang J, Hsu TC, Lin S, Lee CC. Huang HS, et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Oct;24(10):1055-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Dec 5. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018. PMID: 29208560 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Syndromic Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (mPCR) Testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: Current Practice and Future Directions.
Rader TS 4th, Stevens MP, Bearman G. Rader TS 4th, et al. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2021;23(4):5. doi: 10.1007/s11908-021-00748-z. Epub 2021 Feb 26. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2021. PMID: 33679252 Free PMC article. Review. - Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST v2 Assay for Respiratory Viral Infections.
Xie LM, Yin X, Xie TA, Su JW, Huang Q, Zhang JH, Huang YF, Guo XG. Xie LM, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jan;63(1):95-103. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.95. Yonsei Med J. 2022. PMID: 34913289 Free PMC article. - Low-Density TaqMan® Array Cards for the Detection of Pathogens.
Heaney J, Rolfe K, Gleadall NS, Greatorex JS, Curran MD. Heaney J, et al. Methods Microbiol. 2015;42:199-218. doi: 10.1016/bs.mim.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Aug 3. Methods Microbiol. 2015. PMID: 38620215 Free PMC article. - The new frontier of diagnostics: Molecular assays and their role in infection prevention and control.
Das S, Shibib DR, Vernon MO. Das S, et al. Am J Infect Control. 2017 Feb 1;45(2):158-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.005. Am J Infect Control. 2017. PMID: 28159066 Free PMC article. Review. - Salvage microbiology: opportunities and challenges in the detection of bacterial pathogens following initiation of antimicrobial treatment.
Farrell JJ, Hujer AM, Sampath R, Bonomo RA. Farrell JJ, et al. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015 Mar;15(3):349-60. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2015.989216. Epub 2014 Dec 19. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2015. PMID: 25523281 Free PMC article. Review.
References
- Krasinski K, LaCouture R, Holzman RS, Waithe E, Bonk S, Hanna B. 1990. Screening for respiratory syncytial virus and assignment to a cohort at admission to reduce nosocomial transmission. J. Pediatr. 116:894–898 - PubMed
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012. Evaluation of 11 commercially available rapid influenza diagnostic tests—United States, 2011-2012. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 61:873–876 - PubMed
- Uyeki TM, Prasad R, Vukotich C, Stebbins S, Rinaldo CR, Ferng YH, Morse SS, Larson EL, Aiello AE, Davis B, Monto AS. 2009. Low sensitivity of rapid diagnostic test for influenza. Clin. Infect. Dis. 48:e89–e92 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources