PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts - PubMed (original) (raw)

Guideline

PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts

Elaine M Beller et al. PLoS Med. 2013.

Abstract

Elaine Beller and colleagues from the PRISMA for Abstracts group provide a reporting guidelines for reporting abstracts of systematic reviews in journals and at conferences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

TL is employed by The Cochrane Collaboration. TL is an editor (unpaid) for the Cochrane Airways Group. The authors have declared that no other competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I (2010) Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med 7 (9) e1000326 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dogan RI, Murray GC, Neveol A, Lu Z (2009) Understanding PubMed user search behavior through log analysis. Database: Article ID bap018. doi:10.1093/database/bap018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tovey D (2010) Impact of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7 (8) ED000007. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature (1987) A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ann Intern Med 106: 598–604. - PubMed
    1. Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ (1990) More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med 113: 69–76. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

This research was supported (in part) by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Center for Biotechnology Information (National Library of Medicine). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources