Home-based versus hospital-based high-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized study - PubMed (original) (raw)
Randomized Controlled Trial
doi: 10.1177/2047487313488299. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
Affiliations
- PMID: 23613224
- DOI: 10.1177/2047487313488299
Randomized Controlled Trial
Home-based versus hospital-based high-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized study
Inger-Lise Aamot et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Sep.
Abstract
Background: High-intensity interval training (HIT) as exercise therapy is gradually implemented in cardiac rehabilitation as the cardiovascular benefits from exercise is intensity dependent. However, in previous studies, HIT has been performed with strict supervision. The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of different modes of HIT in cardiac rehabilitation.
Design: a randomized clinical study.
Methods: Ninety participants with coronary artery disease (80 men/10 women, mean age 57 ± 8 years) were randomly assigned to one of three exercise modes: group exercise (GE), treadmill exercise (TE), or home-based exercise (HE). HIT was performed twice a week for 12 weeks with an exercise intensity of 85-95% of peak heart rate. The primary outcome measure was change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2).
Results: Eighty-three participants (92%) completed the intervention without any severe adverse events. Peak VO2 increased from 34.7 ± 7.3 to 39.0 ± 8.0 ml/kg/min, 32.7 ± 6.5 to 36.0 ± 6.2 ml/kg/min, and 34.4 ± 4.8 to 37.2 ± 5.2 ml/kg/min in TE, GE, and HE, respectively. Mean group difference for TE vs. HE was 1.6 ml/kg/min (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.7 to 3.1, p = 0.02), TE vs. GE 1.1 ml/kg/min (95% CI-0.5 to 2.5, p = 0.27), and GE vs. HE 0.6 ml/kg/min (95% CI -1.0 to 2.1, p = 1). However, on-treatment analysis showed no significant difference between groups.
Conclusion: HIT was efficiently performed in three settings of cardiac rehabilitation, with respect to target exercise intensity, exercise attendance, and increase in peak VO2. Exercise mode was not essential for exercise capacity.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00964067.
Keywords: Cardiac rehabilitation; exercise attendance; feasibility; high-intensity interval training; home-based exercise; quality of life.
© The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.
Similar articles
- Long-term Exercise Adherence After High-intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Randomized Study.
Aamot IL, Karlsen T, Dalen H, Støylen A. Aamot IL, et al. Physiother Res Int. 2016 Mar;21(1):54-64. doi: 10.1002/pri.1619. Epub 2015 Feb 16. Physiother Res Int. 2016. PMID: 25689059 Clinical Trial. - High-intensity interval training is not superior to other forms of endurance training during cardiac rehabilitation.
Tschentscher M, Eichinger J, Egger A, Droese S, Schönfelder M, Niebauer J. Tschentscher M, et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jan;23(1):14-20. doi: 10.1177/2047487314560100. Epub 2014 Nov 17. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 25404752 Clinical Trial. - Aerobic interval training increases peak oxygen uptake more than usual care exercise training in myocardial infarction patients: a randomized controlled study.
Moholdt T, Aamot IL, Granøien I, Gjerde L, Myklebust G, Walderhaug L, Brattbakk L, Hole T, Graven T, Stølen TO, Amundsen BH, Mølmen-Hansen HE, Støylen A, Wisløff U, Slørdahl SA. Moholdt T, et al. Clin Rehabil. 2012 Jan;26(1):33-44. doi: 10.1177/0269215511405229. Epub 2011 Sep 21. Clin Rehabil. 2012. PMID: 21937520 Clinical Trial. - High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gomes-Neto M, Durães AR, Reis HFCD, Neves VR, Martinez BP, Carvalho VO. Gomes-Neto M, et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Nov;24(16):1696-1707. doi: 10.1177/2047487317728370. Epub 2017 Aug 21. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28825321 Review.
Cited by
- Are physical fitness outcomes in patients attending cardiac rehabilitation determined by the mode of delivery?
Harrison AS, Tang L, Doherty P. Harrison AS, et al. Open Heart. 2018 Jul 16;5(2):e000822. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000822. eCollection 2018. Open Heart. 2018. PMID: 30057769 Free PMC article. - Remotely monitored telerehabilitation for cardiac patients: A review of the current situation.
Batalik L, Filakova K, Batalikova K, Dosbaba F. Batalik L, et al. World J Clin Cases. 2020 May 26;8(10):1818-1831. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i10.1818. World J Clin Cases. 2020. PMID: 32518772 Free PMC article. Review. - Cardiac telerehabilitation: current status and future perspectives.
Brouwers RWM, Scherrenberg M, Kemps HMC, Dendale P, Snoek JA. Brouwers RWM, et al. Neth Heart J. 2024 Jan;32(1):31-37. doi: 10.1007/s12471-023-01833-9. Epub 2023 Dec 12. Neth Heart J. 2024. PMID: 38085505 Free PMC article. Review. - Effect of home-based high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial.
Yakut H, Dursun H, Felekoğlu E, Başkurt AA, Alpaydın AÖ, Özalevli S. Yakut H, et al. Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Dec;191(6):2539-2548. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02867-x. Epub 2022 Jan 7. Ir J Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 34993836 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT FROM THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR AND PULMONARY REHABILITATION, THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, AND THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY.
Thomas RJ, Beatty AL, Beckie TM, Brewer LC, Brown TM, Forman DE, Franklin BA, Keteyian SJ, Kitzman DW, Regensteiner JG, Sanderson BK, Whooley MA. Thomas RJ, et al. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019 Jul;39(4):208-225. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000447. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019. PMID: 31082934 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical