Comparison of accelerometer cut points to estimate physical activity in US adults - PubMed (original) (raw)

Comparative Study

Comparison of accelerometer cut points to estimate physical activity in US adults

Kathleen B Watson et al. J Sports Sci. 2014.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was (1) to describe physical activity prevalence, categorised according to the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (2008 Guidelines), using different accelerometer cut points and (2) to examine physical activity prevalence patterns by reported cut points across selected characteristics. Cut points from 9 studies were used to estimate physical activity prevalence in a national adult sample (n = 6547). Estimates were stratified by validation study activity protocols used to derive cut points--ambulatory (walking/running) and lifestyle activities (e.g. gardening, housework, walking). Results showed that the prevalence of meeting the 2008 Guidelines ranged from 6.3% to 98.3% overall and was lower for cut points derived from ambulatory (median = 11.5%, range = 6.3-27.4%) compared to lifestyle (median = 77.2%, range = 60.6-98.3%) protocols. Prevalence patterns across protocols differed for age, but were similar for other characteristics. In conclusion, prevalence of meeting the 2008 Guidelines varied widely, indicating that choice of cut point had an impact on prevalence. To generate future accelerometer cut points one may consider developing cut points for demographic subgroups using a variety of lifestyle physical activities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atienza AA, Moser RP, Perna F, Dodd K, Ballard-Barbash R, Troiano RP, Berrigan D. Self-reported and objectively measured activity related to biomarkers using NHANES. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(5):815–821. - PubMed
    1. Ballard-Barbash R, Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Siddiqi SM, McTiernan A, Alfano CM. Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(11):815–840. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bassett DR, Jr, Ainsworth BE, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, King GA. Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S471–S480. - PubMed
    1. Bowles HR. Measurement of active and sedentary behaviors: closing the gaps in self-report methods. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(Suppl 1):S1–S4. - PubMed
    1. Bowles HR, Subar AF, Matthews CE, Troiano RP, Dodd K, Midthune D, Park Y. Designing measurement error investigations of self-reported and objectively monitored physical activity: The IDATA Study and MEASURE; Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Diet and Activity Methods; Rome, Itlay. 2012. May 14–17, 2012.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources