Vitamin C intake, circulating vitamin C and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective studies - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Vitamin C intake, circulating vitamin C and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

Guo-Chong Chen et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013.

Abstract

Background: Though vitamin C supplementation has shown no observed effects on stroke prevention in several clinical trials, uncertainty remains as to whether long-term, low-dose intake influences the development of stroke among general populations. Furthermore, the association between circulating vitamin C and the risk of stroke is also unclear. For further clarification of these issues, we conducted a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Methods and results: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched, and the bibliographies of the retrieved articles were also reviewed to identify eligible studies. Summary relative risk (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed with a random-effects model. The summary RR for the high-versus-low categories was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74 to 0.90) for dietary vitamin C intake (11 studies), and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.49 to 0.79) for circulating vitamin C (6 studies). The summary RR for each 100 mg/day increment in dietary vitamin C was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.93) (10 studies), and for each 20 μmol/L increment in circulating vitamin C was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.88) (5 studies). Few studies reported results for vitamin C supplements (RR for high-versus-low intake=0.83, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.10, 3 studies).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests significant inverse relationships between dietary vitamin C intake, circulating vitamin C, and risk of stroke.

Keywords: antioxidants; diet; meta‐analysis; prevention; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Flow chart of study selection.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Meta‐analysis of dietary vitamin C intake and risk of stroke. A, high vs low analysis; (B) dose‐response analysis. F indicates women; M, men; N.A., not available; RR, relative risk.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Meta‐analysis of circulating vitamin C and risk of stroke. A, high vs low analysis; (B) dose‐response analysis. F indicates women; M, men; N.A., not available; RR, relative risk.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Relative risk (solid line) with 95% confidence interval (long dashed lines) for the association between vitamin C intake (total or dietary intake) and risk of stroke in a restricted cubic spline random‐effects meta‐analysis. The lowest intake of 15.2 mg/day was used to estimate all relative risks.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lloyd‐Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Ford E, Furie K, Gillespie C, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho PM, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott MM, Meigs J, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino M, Nichol G, Roger VL, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P, Thom T, Wasserthiel‐Smoller S, Wong ND, Wylie‐Rosett J. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010; 121:e46-e215 - PubMed
    1. He FJ, Nowson CA, MacGregor GA. Fruit and vegetable consumption and stroke: meta‐analysis of cohort studies. Lancet. 2006; 367:320-326 - PubMed
    1. Juraschek SP, Guallar E, Appel LJ, Miller ER., III Effects of vitamin C supplementation on blood pressure: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 95:1079-1088 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Block G, Jensen CD, Norkus EP, Hudes M, Crawford PB. Vitamin C in plasma is inversely related to blood pressure and change in blood pressure during the previous year in young Black and White women. Nutr J. 2008; 7:35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Myung SK, Ju W, Cho B, Oh SW, Park SM, Koo BK, Park BJ. Efficacy of vitamin and antioxidant supplements in prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013; 346:f10. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources