Screening and Scoring of Antimicrobial and Biological Activities of Italian Vulnerary Plants against Major Oral Pathogenic Bacteria - PubMed (original) (raw)

Screening and Scoring of Antimicrobial and Biological Activities of Italian Vulnerary Plants against Major Oral Pathogenic Bacteria

Gianmaria F Ferrazzano et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the activity of Italian vulnerary plants against the most important oral pathogenic bacteria. This estimate was accomplished through a fivefold process: (a) a review of ethnobotanical and microbiological data concerning the Italian vulnerary plants; (b) the development of a scoring system to rank the plants; (c) the comparative assessment of microbiological properties; (d) the assessment of potential cytotoxic effects on keratinocyte-like cells and gingival fibroblasts in culture by XTT cell viability assay; (e) clinical evaluation of the most suitable plant extract as antibacterial agent in a home-made mouthwash. The study assays hexane (H), ethanol (E), and water (W) extracts from 72 plants. The agar diffusion method was used to evaluate the activity against Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus casei, and Actinomyces viscosus. Twenty-two plants showed appreciable activity. The extracts showing the strongest antibacterial power were those from Cotinus coggygria Scop., Equisetum hyemale L., Helichrysum litoreum Guss, Juniperus communis L., and Phyllitis scolopendrium (L.) Newman subsp. scolopendrium. The potential cytotoxic effect of these extracts was assessed. On the basis of these observations, a mouth-rinse containing the ethanolic extract of H. litoreum has been tested in vivo, resulting in reduction of the salivary concentration of S. mutans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Effects of selected plant extracts (as indicated) on viability of keratonocyte-like cells and gingival fibroblasts as measured by XTT assay. Statistical significance is defined as *P < 0.01; **P < 0.001; ***P < 0.0001.

Figure 2

Figure 2

(a) Variation of S. mutans concentration (CFU/mL) at t0, t1, and t2 (group A). (b) Variation of S. mutans concentration (CFU/mL) at t0, t1, and t2 (group B).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nishikawara F, Katsumura S, Ando A, et al. Correlation of cariogenic bacteria and dental caries in adults. Journal of Oral Science. 2006;48(4):245–251. - PubMed
    1. Loesche WJ, Syed SA. The predominant cultivable flora of carious plaque and carious dentine. Caries Research. 1973;7(3):201–216. - PubMed
    1. Caufield PW, Dasanayake AP, Li Y. The antimicrobial approach to caries management. Journal of Dental Education. 2001;65(10):1091–1095. - PubMed
    1. Isturiz R. Global resistance trends and the potential impact on empirical therapy. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2008;32(supplement 4):S201–S206. - PubMed
    1. Parsek MR, Singh PK. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2003;57:677–701. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources