Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2013 Nov 21;4(12):2042533313510155.

doi: 10.1177/2042533313510155. eCollection 2013 Dec.

Christopher F Dowrick 1, George K Freeman 2, Jane Gunn 3, Frances Mair 4, Carl May 5, Stewart Mercer 4, Victoria Palmer 3, Amanda Howe 6, Greg Irving 1, Alice Shiner 6, Jessica Watson 7

Affiliations

Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions

Joanne Reeve et al. JRSM Short Rep. 2013.

Abstract

Objectives: Provision of person-centred generalist care is a core component of quality primary care systems. The World Health Organisation believes that a lack of generalist primary care is contributing to inefficiency, ineffectiveness and inequity in healthcare. In UK primary care, General Practitioners (GPs) are the largest group of practising generalists. Yet GPs fulfil multiple roles and the pressures of delivering these roles along with wider contextual changes create real challenges to generalist practice. Our study aimed to explore GP perceptions of enablers and constraints for expert generalist care, in order to identify what is needed to ensure health systems are designed to support the generalist role.

Design: Qualitative study in General Practice.

Setting: UK primary care.

Main outcome measures: A qualitative study - interviews, surveys and focus groups with GPs and GP trainees. Data collection and analysis was informed by Normalisation Process Theory.

Design and setting: Qualitative study in General Practice. We conducted interviews, surveys and focus groups with GPs and GP trainees based mainly, but not exclusively, in the UK. Data collection and analysis were informed by Normalization Process Theory.

Participants: UK based GPs (interview and surveys); European GP trainees (focus groups).

Results: Our findings highlight key gaps in current training and service design which may limit development and implementation of expert generalist practice (EGP). These include the lack of a consistent and universal understanding of the distinct expertise of EGP, competing priorities inhibiting the delivery of EGP, lack of the consistent development of skills in interpretive practice and a lack of resources for monitoring EGP.

Conclusions: WE DESCRIBE FOUR AREAS FOR CHANGE: Translating EGP, Priority setting for EGP, Trusting EGP and Identifying the impact of EGP. We outline proposals for work needed in each area to help enhance the expert generalist role.

Keywords: generalism; generalist expertise; generalist practice; normalisation process theory; primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Expert Generalist Practice – a complex intervention.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Starfield B. Politics, primary care and health: was Virchow right? J Epidemiol Community Health 2011; 65: 653–655–653–655 - PubMed
    1. Kringos DS, Boerma WGW, Hutchinson A, van der Zee J, Groenewegen PP. The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10: 65–65 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Primary health care: now more than ever, Geneva; London: World Health Organisation, 2008
    1. Gunn J, Palmer VNL, Kokanovic R, Pope C, Lathlean J. What is the place of generalism in the 2020 primary care team?, Melbourne: Australian Primary Health Care Institute, 2007
    1. Medical generalism: why expertise in whole person medicine matters, London: Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012

LinkOut - more resources