An excitatory paraventricular nucleus to AgRP neuron circuit that drives hunger - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2014 Mar 13;507(7491):238-42.

doi: 10.1038/nature12956. Epub 2014 Feb 2.

Bhavik P Shah 1, Joseph C Madara 2, David P Olson 3, David E Strochlic 4, Alastair S Garfield 5, Linh Vong 3, Hongjuan Pei 6, Mitsuko Watabe-Uchida 7, Naoshige Uchida 8, Stephen D Liberles 4, Bradford B Lowell 9

Affiliations

An excitatory paraventricular nucleus to AgRP neuron circuit that drives hunger

Michael J Krashes et al. Nature. 2014.

Abstract

Hunger is a hard-wired motivational state essential for survival. Agouti-related peptide (AgRP)-expressing neurons in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) at the base of the hypothalamus are crucial to the control of hunger. They are activated by caloric deficiency and, when naturally or artificially stimulated, they potently induce intense hunger and subsequent food intake. Consistent with their obligatory role in regulating appetite, genetic ablation or chemogenetic inhibition of AgRP neurons decreases feeding. Excitatory input to AgRP neurons is important in caloric-deficiency-induced activation, and is notable for its remarkable degree of caloric-state-dependent synaptic plasticity. Despite the important role of excitatory input, its source(s) has been unknown. Here, through the use of Cre-recombinase-enabled, cell-specific neuron mapping techniques in mice, we have discovered strong excitatory drive that, unexpectedly, emanates from the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, specifically from subsets of neurons expressing thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP, also known as ADCYAP1). Chemogenetic stimulation of these afferent neurons in sated mice markedly activates AgRP neurons and induces intense feeding. Conversely, acute inhibition in mice with caloric-deficiency-induced hunger decreases feeding. Discovery of these afferent neurons capable of triggering hunger advances understanding of how this intense motivational state is regulated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1. Mapping and evaluating connectivity of inputs to AgRPARC neurons

a, Rabies schematic. b, EGFP detected in the ARC and DMH (Left) and PVH (Right) in Agrp-ires-Cre mice. c,d, Top, schematic shows connections being tested. Right, representative brains from mice stereotaxically injected with AAV8-DIO-ChR2-mCherry (red = ChR2-mCherry, green = hrGFP from Npy-hrGFP. Bottom, representative traces showing assessment of light-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) with blue tic indicating the light pulse (473 nm wavelength, 2 msec). Mice used were Vglut2-ires-Cre; Npy-hrGFP. ChR2 was targeted to (c) DMH and (d) PVH. CNQX = AMPA receptor blocker. e, Average amplitude of light-evoked EPSCs (pA) in AgRP neurons (n = 40 for VGLUT2DMH→AgRPARC group; n = 45 for VGLUT2PVH→AgRPARC group). Results are shown as mean ± SEM, **=p<0.001; see Supplementary Information for statistical analyses. f,g, Representative raster plots of EPSCs for (f) VGLUT2DMH→AgRPARC and (g) VGLUT2PVH→AgRPARC. h,i, Representative traces showing light-evoked changes in membrane potentials in AgRP neurons for (h) VGLUT2DMH→AgRPARC and (i) VGLUT2PVH→AgRPARC. e. n = 45 for VGLUT2PVH→AgRPARC group; n = 40 for VGLUT2DMH→AgRPARC group. Data represent mean ± SEM. P values for unpaired comparisons were calculated by two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p< 0.05, **p <0.001.

Figure 2

Figure 2. TRHPVH and PACAPPVH neurons provide excitatory input to AgRP neurons

a-d, Top, schematic shows connections being tested. Right, representative brain sections of PVH injected with AAV8-DIO-ChR2-mCherry (white = ChR2-mCherry). Bottom, representative traces showing assessment of light-evoked EPSCs with blue tic indicating the light pulse (473 nm wavelength, 2 msec). Mice used were (a) Sim1-Cre; Npy-hrGFP, (b) Pdyn-ires-Cre; Npy-hrGFP, (c) Trh-ires-Cre; Npy-hrGFP, and (d) Pacap-ires-Cre; Npy-hrGFP. CNQX = AMPA receptor blocker. e-h, Baseline and effects of PACAP (100 nM) with or without PAC1R blocker (PACAP6-38; 200 nM) on membrane potential and firing rate of AgRP neurons (n = 18, n = 10, n = 8, respectively). Results are shown as mean ± SEM, **=p<0.001; see Supplementary Information for statistical analyses. g, h. n = 18 for baseline group; n = 10 for PACAP1-38 group; n = 8 for PACAP1-38 + PACAP6-38 group. P values for pair-wise comparisons (baseline versus PACAP1-38 group) and unpaired comparisons (baseline versus PACAP1-38 + PACAP6-38 group) were calculated by two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p< 0.05, **p <0.001.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Fidelity of TRHPVH/PACAPPVH→ARC and AgRPARC→PVH circuitry

a-f, Left, schematic shows connections being tested. Right, representative traces showing assessment of light-evoked EPSCs (a-c) or IPSCs (d-f) with blue tic indicating the light pulse (473 nm wavelength, 2 msec). Mice used were (a) Trh-ires-Cre; Pomc-hrGFP, (b-c) Pacap-ires-Cre; Pomc-hrGFP, (d) Agrp-ires-Cre; Sim1-Cre; R26-loxSTOPlox-L10-GFP mice for visualization of SIM1 neurons, (e) Agrp-ires-Cre; Trh-ires-Cre injected with AAV8-DIO-mCherry into the PVH for visualization of TRH neurons and (f) Agrp-ires-Cre; Pacap-ires-Cre; R26-loxSTOPlox-L10-GFP mice for visualization of PACAP neurons. CNQX = AMPA receptor blocker. PTX = GABAA receptor blocker. (g) Model summarizing reciprocal circuitry and its fidelity.

Figure 4

Figure 4. DREADD-mediated manipulation of TRHPVH or PACAPPVH neurons mediates feeding through AgRP neurons

a,d, Membrane potential and firing rate of (a) TRHPVH or (d) PACAPPVH neurons transduced with AAV8-DIO-hM3Dq-mCherry upon CNO application. b,e, AAV8-DIO-hM3Dq-mCherry was transduced unilaterally into the PVH of (b) Trh-ires-Cre or (e) Pacap-ires-Cre mice and ipsilateral induction of Fos (red) was assessed in AgRP neurons (marked by hrGFP, green) 3 hrs following CNO (0.3 mg kg-1) injection (n=3, n=3; respectively). c,f, Left, AAV8-DIO-hM3Dq-mCherry (white) was transduced bilaterally into the PVH of (c) Trh-ires-Cre or (f) Pacap-ires-Cre mice. Right, light-cycle food intake after injection of saline (black) or CNO (red; 0.3 mg kg-1) (n=7-8 animals per condition; experiment replicated three times per animal). g,h, Simultaneous inhibition of AgRPARC neurons with activation of TRHPVH neurons attenuates food intake. (g) Sagittal schematic of occlusion study, whereby AAV8-DIO-hM3Dq-mCherry (white) was transduced bilaterally into the PVH (Top) and AAV8-DIO-hM4Di-mCherry (white) was transduced bilaterally into the ARC (Bottom) of Trh-ires-Cre; Agrp-ires-Cre mice. (h) light-cycle food intake after injection of saline (black) or CNO (red; 0.3 mg kg-1) in Trh-ires-Cre; Agrp-ires-Cre (dotted; hM3Dq in PVH and hM4Di in ARC) and Trh-ires-Cre (solid; hM3Dq in PVH) mice (n=4 animals per condition; experiment replicated three times per animal). i, (Top) Membrane potential and firing rate of TRHPVH neurons transduced with AAV8-DIO-hM4Di-mCherry upon CNO application. (Bottom) AAV8-DIO-hM4Di-mCherry (white) was transduced bilaterally into the PVH of Trh-ires-Cre mice. j, Dark-cycle food intake after injection of saline (black) or CNO (red; 0.3 mg kg-1) (n=4 animals per condition; experiment replicated three times per animal). Results are shown as mean ± SEM, *=p<0.05, **=p<0.001; see Supplementary Information for statistical analyses. b,e. n = 3 for each group. Data represent mean ± SEM. P values for unpaired comparisons were calculated by two-tailed Student’s t-test. *p< 0.05. c, f. n = 8 for Trh-ires-Cre group; n = 7 for Pacap-ires-Cre group. Data represent mean ± SEM. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA detected significant interaction of ‘time’ and ‘treatment’. F3,20 = 56.13, **p <0.001; F3,18 = 0.056, **p <0.001; respectively. Sidak’s post-hoc test shows significant difference between ‘time’ and ‘treatment’ at 1 and 2 hrs as indicated; respectively. h. n = 4 for each group. Data represent mean ± SEM. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA detected significant interaction of ‘genotype’ and ‘treatment’. F3,18 = 6.083, *p < 0.05. Sidak’s post-hoc test shows significant difference between ‘genotype’ and ‘treatment’ as indicated. j. n = 4. Data represent mean ± SEM. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA detected significant interaction of ‘time’ and ‘treatment’. F3,18 = 3.962, *p < 0.05. Sidak’s post-hoc test shows significant difference between ‘time’ and ‘treatment’ at 3 hrs as indicated.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Takahashi KA, Cone RD. Fasting induces a large, leptin-dependent increase in the intrinsic action potential frequency of orexigenic arcuate nucleus neuropeptide Y/Agouti-related protein neurons. Endocrinology. 2005;146:1043–1047. - PubMed
    1. Aponte Y, Atasoy D, Sternson SM. AGRP neurons are sufficient to orchestrate feeding behavior rapidly and without training. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:351–355. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krashes MJ, et al. Rapid, reversible activation of AgRP neurons drives feeding behavior in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:1424–1428. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krashes MJ, Shah BP, Koda S, Lowell BB. Rapid versus Delayed Stimulation of Feeding by the Endogenously Released AgRP Neuron Mediators GABA, NPY, and AgRP. Cell Metab. 2013;18:588–595. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atasoy D, Betley JN, Su HH, Sternson SM. Deconstruction of a neural circuit for hunger. Nature. 2012;488:172–177. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources