Headstrong intervention for pediatric migraine headache: a randomized clinical trial - PubMed (original) (raw)

Randomized Controlled Trial

Headstrong intervention for pediatric migraine headache: a randomized clinical trial

Michael A Rapoff et al. J Headache Pain. 2014.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a self-guided CD-ROM program ("Headstrong") containing cognitive-behavioral self-management strategies versus an educational CD-ROM program for treating headaches, headache-related disability, and quality of life.

Methods: Participants were 35 children ages 7-12 years with migraine recruited from one university medical center and two children's hospital headache clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to complete the Headstrong or educational control CD-ROM program over a 4-week period. Data on headache frequency, duration, and severity, migraine-related disability, and quality of life (QOL) were obtained at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-months post-intervention.

Results: At post-intervention, Headstrong resulted in lower severity (on a 10-point scale) than the control group by child report (5.06 ± 1.50 SD vs. 6.25 ± 1.92 SD, p = 0.03, ES = 0.7). At 3-months post-intervention, parents reported less migraine-related disability (on the PedMIDAS) in the Headstrong group compared to the control group (1.36 ± 2.06 SD vs. 5.18 ± 6.40 SD; p = 0.04, ES = 0.8). There were no other group differences at post treatment or at 3-months post-intervention.

Conclusions: When compared to an educational control, Headstrong resulted in lower pain severity at post-treatment and less migraine-related disability at 3-months post-intervention, by child and parent report respectively. Headache frequency and quality of life did not change more for Headstrong versus control. Additional research is needed on the Headstrong Program to increase its efficacy and to test it with a larger sample recruited from multiple centers simultaneously.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Consort diagram showing recruitment and retention of participants.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abu-Arafeh I, Razak S, Sivaraman B, Graham C. Prevalence of headache and migraine in children and adolescents: a systematic review of population-based studies. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;15:1088–1097. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03793.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kernick D, Campbell J. Measuring the impact of headache in children: a critical review of the literature. Cephalalgia. 2008;15:3–16. - PubMed
    1. Powers SW, Patton SR, Hommel KA, Hershey AD. Quality of life in paediatric migraine: characterization of age-related effects using PedsQL 4.0. Cephalalgia. 2004;15:120–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00652.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charles JA, Peterlin BL, Rapoport AM, Linder SL, Kabbouche MA, Sheftell FD. Favorable outcome of early treatment of new onset child and adolescent migraine-implications for disease modification. J Headache Pain. 2009;15:227–233. doi: 10.1007/s10194-009-0133-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kröner-Herwig B, Gassmann J. Headache disorders in children and adolescents: Their association with psychological, behavioral, and socio-environmental factors. Headache. 2010;15:1387–1401. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources