Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuli - PubMed (original) (raw)
Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuli
C Bushdid et al. Science. 2014.
Abstract
Humans can discriminate several million different colors and almost half a million different tones, but the number of discriminable olfactory stimuli remains unknown. The lay and scientific literature typically claims that humans can discriminate 10,000 odors, but this number has never been empirically validated. We determined the resolution of the human sense of smell by testing the capacity of humans to discriminate odor mixtures with varying numbers of shared components. On the basis of the results of psychophysical testing, we calculated that humans can discriminate at least 1 trillion olfactory stimuli. This is far more than previous estimates of distinguishable olfactory stimuli. It demonstrates that the human olfactory system, with its hundreds of different olfactory receptors, far outperforms the other senses in the number of physically different stimuli it can discriminate.
Figures
Fig. 1
Odor mixtures used to test the resolution of the human olfactory system. (A) Illustration of sample mixtures with exactly 10, 20, or 30 components (green squares) picked from a collection of 128 odorous molecules (gray squares) and the number of possible mixtures of each type. (B) Example of one mixture pair. (C-E) Schematics of each of the 13 types of odor pairs used for discrimination tests along with the total number of possible mixture pairs of each type.
Fig. 2
An empirical investigation of the resolution of the human olfactory system. (A) Schematic of the discrimination tests carried out for mixtures of 10, 20, or 30 odorous molecules. (B-C) Results of discrimination tests with 26 subjects asked to discriminate mixtures of 10 (left), 20 (middle), or 30 (right) components with decreasing overlap from left to right. The dotted line represents the chance detection level (33.3%). For (B), dots represent performance of individual subjects across 20 mixture pairs. For (C), dots represent average performance of all 26 subjects for a given mixture pair. Statistically significant discriminability (red dots) was assessed with a Chi-square test; P value<0.05.
Fig. 3
The number of discriminable olfactory stimuli. (A) Discrimination capacity of subjects according to % mixture overlap. (B) Discriminability of mixture pairs according to % mixture overlap. (C) Extrapolation of the number of discriminable mixtures derived from A. (D) Extrapolation of the number of discriminable mixtures derived from B. (E) Summary of discriminable sensory stimuli across sensory modalities. Data are curated from the following sources: smells (previous estimates) (5-7), tones (3), and colors (1, 2).
Similar articles
- Perceptual blending in odor mixtures depends on the nature of odorants and human olfactory expertise.
Barkat S, Le Berre E, Coureaud G, Sicard G, Thomas-Danguin T. Barkat S, et al. Chem Senses. 2012 Feb;37(2):159-66. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjr086. Epub 2011 Aug 26. Chem Senses. 2012. PMID: 21873604 - How well can young adults and children discriminate between odors?
Cameron EL, Follett SR, Rajcevich Schwer AS. Cameron EL, et al. Psychol Res. 2024 Nov;88(8):2360-2375. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01981-6. Epub 2024 Jun 19. Psychol Res. 2024. PMID: 38896309 - SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.
Hsieh JW, Keller A, Wong M, Jiang RS, Vosshall LB. Hsieh JW, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 24;114(43):11275-11284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711415114. Epub 2017 Oct 10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017. PMID: 29073044 Free PMC article. - An odor is not worth a thousand words: from multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects.
Yeshurun Y, Sobel N. Yeshurun Y, et al. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:219-41, C1-5. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163639. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010. PMID: 19958179 Review. - Understanding smell--the olfactory stimulus problem.
Auffarth B. Auffarth B. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Sep;37(8):1667-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jun 25. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013. PMID: 23806440 Review.
Cited by
- Applying medicinal chemistry strategies to understand odorant discrimination.
Poivet E, Peterlin Z, Tahirova N, Xu L, Altomare C, Paria A, Zou DJ, Firestein S. Poivet E, et al. Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 4;7:11157. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11157. Nat Commun. 2016. PMID: 27040654 Free PMC article. - fNIRS a novel neuroimaging tool to investigate olfaction, olfactory imagery, and crossmodal interactions: a systematic review.
Boot E, Levy A, Gaeta G, Gunasekara N, Parkkinen E, Kontaris E, Jacquot M, Tachtsidis I. Boot E, et al. Front Neurosci. 2024 Jan 31;18:1266664. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1266664. eCollection 2024. Front Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38356646 Free PMC article. Review. - Predicting natural language descriptions of mono-molecular odorants.
Gutiérrez ED, Dhurandhar A, Keller A, Meyer P, Cecchi GA. Gutiérrez ED, et al. Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 26;9(1):4979. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07439-9. Nat Commun. 2018. PMID: 30478272 Free PMC article. - Criticality Creates a Functional Platform for Network Transitions Between Internal and External Processing Modes in the Human Brain.
Kim M, Kim H, Huang Z, Mashour GA, Jordan D, Ilg R, Lee U. Kim M, et al. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Nov 25;15:657809. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.657809. eCollection 2021. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34899199 Free PMC article. - Agonists of G-Protein-Coupled Odorant Receptors Are Predicted from Chemical Features.
Bushdid C, de March CA, Fiorucci S, Matsunami H, Golebiowski J. Bushdid C, et al. J Phys Chem Lett. 2018 May 3;9(9):2235-2240. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00633. Epub 2018 Apr 17. J Phys Chem Lett. 2018. PMID: 29648835 Free PMC article.
References
- Pointer MR, Attridge GG. The number of discernible colours. Color Res Appl. 1998;23:52–54.
- Nickerson D, Newhall SM. A psychological color solid. J Opt Soc Am. 1943;33:419–422.
- Stevens SS, Davis H. Hearing, its psychology and physiology. John Wiley; New York: 1938. pp. 152–154.
- Crocker EC, Henderson LF. Analysis and classification of odors: an effort to develop a workable method. Am Perfum Essent Oil Rev. 1927;22:325.
- Gilbert AN. What the nose knows. Crown Publishers; New York: 2008. pp. 1–5.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources