Criteria for validation and selection of cognitive tests for investigating the effects of foods and nutrients - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Criteria for validation and selection of cognitive tests for investigating the effects of foods and nutrients
Celeste A de Jager et al. Nutr Rev. 2014 Mar.
Abstract
This review is an output of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Europe Marker Initiative, which aims to identify evidence-based criteria for selecting adequate measures of nutrient effects on health through comprehensive literature review. Experts in cognitive and nutrition sciences examined the applicability of these proposed criteria to the field of cognition with respect to the various cognitive domains usually assessed to reflect brain or neurological function. This review covers cognitive domains important in the assessment of neuronal integrity and function, commonly used tests and their state of validation, and the application of the measures to studies of nutrition and nutritional intervention trials. The aim is to identify domain-specific cognitive tests that are sensitive to nutrient interventions and from which guidance can be provided to aid the application of selection criteria for choosing the most suitable tests for proposed nutritional intervention studies using cognitive outcomes. The material in this review serves as a background and guidance document for nutritionists, neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, and neurologists interested in assessing mental health in terms of cognitive test performance and for scientists intending to test the effects of food or food components on cognitive function.
Similar articles
- Poor cognitive ageing: Vulnerabilities, mechanisms and the impact of nutritional interventions.
Miquel S, Champ C, Day J, Aarts E, Bahr BA, Bakker M, Bánáti D, Calabrese V, Cederholm T, Cryan J, Dye L, Farrimond JA, Korosi A, Layé S, Maudsley S, Milenkovic D, Mohajeri MH, Sijben J, Solomon A, Spencer JPE, Thuret S, Vanden Berghe W, Vauzour D, Vellas B, Wesnes K, Willatts P, Wittenberg R, Geurts L. Miquel S, et al. Ageing Res Rev. 2018 Mar;42:40-55. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 15. Ageing Res Rev. 2018. PMID: 29248758 Review. - Evaluation of techniques to identify beneficial effects of nutrition and natural products on cognitive function.
Wesnes KA. Wesnes KA. Nutr Rev. 2010 Nov;68 Suppl 1:S22-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00328.x. Nutr Rev. 2010. PMID: 20946365 Review. - Improving selection of markers in nutrition research: evaluation of the criteria proposed by the ILSI Europe Marker Validation Initiative.
Calder PC, Boobis A, Braun D, Champ CL, Dye L, Einöther S, Greyling A, Matthys C, Putz P, Wopereis S, Woodside JV, Antoine JM. Calder PC, et al. Nutr Res Rev. 2017 Jun;30(1):73-81. doi: 10.1017/S0954422416000263. Epub 2017 Feb 16. Nutr Res Rev. 2017. PMID: 28202104 Review. - Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18328408 Review. - The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity.
Nuechterlein KH, Green MF, Kern RS, Baade LE, Barch DM, Cohen JD, Essock S, Fenton WS, Frese FJ 3rd, Gold JM, Goldberg T, Heaton RK, Keefe RS, Kraemer H, Mesholam-Gately R, Seidman LJ, Stover E, Weinberger DR, Young AS, Zalcman S, Marder SR. Nuechterlein KH, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;165(2):203-13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010042. Epub 2008 Jan 2. Am J Psychiatry. 2008. PMID: 18172019
Cited by
- Long-term effects of an egg-protein hydrolysate on cognitive performance and brain vascular function: a double-blind randomized controlled trial in adults with elevated subjective cognitive failures.
Adams MS, Mensink RP, Plat J, Joris PJ. Adams MS, et al. Eur J Nutr. 2024 Sep;63(6):2095-2107. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03394-y. Epub 2024 May 4. Eur J Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38703228 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Short-term Aronia melanocarpa extract supplementation improves cognitive performance: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study in healthy young adults.
Ahles S, Joris PJ, Plat J. Ahles S, et al. Eur J Nutr. 2024 Aug;63(5):1545-1553. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03381-3. Epub 2024 Apr 24. Eur J Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38656355 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - A combined DHA-rich fish oil and cocoa flavanols intervention does not improve cognition or brain structure in older adults with memory complaints: results from the CANN randomized, controlled parallel-design study.
Vauzour D, Scholey A, White DJ, Cohen NJ, Cassidy A, Gillings R, Irvine MA, Kay CD, Kim M, King R, Legido-Quigley C, Potter JF, Schwarb H, Minihane AM. Vauzour D, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Aug;118(2):369-381. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.06.008. Epub 2023 Jun 12. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37315924 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Perspective: Advancing Dietary Guidance for Cognitive Health-Focus On Solutions to Harmonize Test Selection, Implementation, and Evaluation.
Romijn AR, Latulippe ME, Snetselaar L, Willatts P, Melanson L, Gershon R, Tangney C, A Young H. Romijn AR, et al. Adv Nutr. 2023 May;14(3):366-378. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Adv Nutr. 2023. PMID: 36997091 Free PMC article. - Chronic Consumption of Cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon) for 12 Weeks Improves Episodic Memory and Regional Brain Perfusion in Healthy Older Adults: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Groups Feasibility Study.
Flanagan E, Cameron D, Sobhan R, Wong C, Pontifex MG, Tosi N, Mena P, Del Rio D, Sami S, Narbad A, Müller M, Hornberger M, Vauzour D. Flanagan E, et al. Front Nutr. 2022 May 19;9:849902. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.849902. eCollection 2022. Front Nutr. 2022. PMID: 35662954 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical