Perspectives in the use of tannins as alternative to antimicrobial growth promoter factors in poultry - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Perspectives in the use of tannins as alternative to antimicrobial growth promoter factors in poultry

Leandro M Redondo et al. Front Microbiol. 2014.

Abstract

Antibiotics have been included in the formulation of feed for livestock production for more than 40 years as a strategy to improve feed conversion rates and to reduce costs. The use of antimicrobials as growth-promoting factors (AGP) in sub-therapeutic doses for long periods is particularly favorable for the selection of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms. In the last years, global concern about development of antimicrobial resistance and transference of resistance genes from animal to human strains has been rising. Removal of AGP from animal diets involves tremendous pressure on the livestock and poultry farmers, one of the main consequences being a substantial increase in the incidence of infectious diseases with the associated increase in the use of antibiotics for therapy, and concomitantly, economic cost. Therefore, alternatives to AGP are urgently needed. The challenge is to implement new alternatives without affecting the production performances of livestock and avoiding the increase of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms. Plant extracts and purified derived substances are showing promising results for animal nutrition, either from their efficacy as well as from an economical point of view. Tannins are plant derived compounds that are being successfully used as additives in poultry feed to control diseases and to improve animal performance. Successful use of any of these extracts as feed additives must ensure a product of consistent quality in enough quantity to fulfill the actual requirements of the poultry industry. Chestnut (hydrolysable) and Quebracho (condensed) tannins are probably the most readily available commercial products that are covering those needs. The present report intends to analyze the available data supporting their use.

Keywords: animal health; antibiotics; growth promoting factors; necrotic enteritis; plant extracts; poultry; tannins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adak G. K., Cowden J. M., Nicholas S. (1995). The Public Health Laboratory Service national case-control study of primary indigenous sporadic cases of Campylobacter infection. Epidemiol. Infect. 115 15–2210.1017/S0950268800058076 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson R. C., Vodovnik M., Min B. R., Pinchak W. E., Krueger N. A., Harvey R. B., et al. (2012). Bactericidal effect of hydrolysable and condensed tannin extracts on Campylobacter jejuni in vitro. Folia Microbiol. 57 253–25810.1007/s12223-012-0119-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Athanasiadou S., Kyriazakis I., Jackson F., Coop R. L. (2000). Effects of short-term exposure to condensed tannins on adult Trichostrongylus colubriformis. Veter. Record 146 728–73210.1136/vr.146.25.728 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bae H. D., McAllister T. A., Yanke J., Cheng K.-J., Muir A. D. (1993). Effects of condensed tannins on endoglucanase activity and filter paper digestion by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59 2132–2138 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnes E. M., Mead G. C., Barnum D. A., Harry E. G. (1972). The intestinal flora of the chicken in the period 2 to 6 weeks of age, with particular reference to the anaerobic bacteria. Br. Poult. Sci. 13 311–32610.1080/00071667208415953 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources