Galanin neurons in the medial preoptic area govern parental behaviour - PubMed (original) (raw)

Galanin neurons in the medial preoptic area govern parental behaviour

Zheng Wu et al. Nature. 2014.

Abstract

Mice display robust, stereotyped behaviours towards pups: virgin males typically attack pups, whereas virgin females and sexually experienced males and females display parental care. Here we show that virgin males genetically impaired in vomeronasal sensing do not attack pups and are parental. Furthermore, we uncover a subset of galanin-expressing neurons in the medial preoptic area (MPOA) that are specifically activated during male and female parenting, and a different subpopulation that is activated during mating. Genetic ablation of MPOA galanin neurons results in marked impairment of parental responses in males and females and affects male mating. Optogenetic activation of these neurons in virgin males suppresses inter-male and pup-directed aggression and induces pup grooming. Thus, MPOA galanin neurons emerge as an essential regulatory node of male and female parenting behaviour and other social responses. These results provide an entry point to a circuit-level dissection of parental behaviour and its modulation by social experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1. Pup-directed behavior of _Trpc2_−/− and Trpc2+/− virgin animals and switch from attack to parenting in males after mating

a, Behavior analysis of _Trpc2_−/− and Trpc2+/− virgin males demonstrates significantly different responses to pups in the presence or absence of VNO signaling. Chi-square test with Bonferroni correction, **P<0.01. b, Combined percentage of pups (out of four) retrieved by an animal group as a function of time. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with Bonferroni correction, P<0.001 between _Trpc2_−/− and Trpc2+/− males, P<0.01 between _Trpc2_−/− males and _Trpc2_−/− females. c-f, Time spent in nest, and duration of crouching, pup grooming and nest building. Mean±SEM; Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ns. not significant. g, Behavior of Trpc2+/− males tested after increasing durations of cohabitation with females subsequent to mating. Males mated on Day 0 except virgin controls, which were individually housed from Day 0 throughout the test. Male behavior switches from attack to parenting at a time period after mating that corresponds to the birth of their pups.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Parenting activates galanin-expressing neurons in the MPOA

a-c, c-fos mRNA expression in the MPOA of virgin males, fathers and virgin females after interaction with pups. d, Schematic illustration of the MPOA in sagittal and coronal sections, adapted from the Paxinos and Franklin mouse brain atlas. e, Social behaviors induce c-fos activation in the MPOA in virgin and mated males and females. Groups are labeled as follows: C: fresh bedding exposure; KO: _Trpc2_−/−; fa: father; vf: virgin female; mo: mother. Mean+SEM, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post test comparing all the social interaction groups to fresh bedding control, ***P<0.001. ns, not significant. f, g catFISH identifying parenting and mating induced c-fos in the MPOA in males show that the two behaviors activate largely distinct MPOA neuronal populations. Par: Parenting; Mat: Mating; nuc: nuclear (yellow); cyto: cytoplasmic (red). Mean+SEM, one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post test comparing all pairs of groups, **P<0.01. h, Co-labeling c-fos and Gal in the MPOA of virgin females after interaction with pups. i, j, Percentage of _c-fos_+ cells expressing Gal and percentage of _Gal_+ cells expressing c-fos in males and females after various social interactions, compared to the percentages of NeuN+ cells expressing Gal and c-fos, respectively. Agg: Aggression. Mean+SEM, _t_-test pairing the measurements from each animal, adjusted by Benjamini– Hochberg procedure controlling the false discovery rate. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ns, not significant.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Ablation of MPOA _Gal_+ neurons impairs maternal behavior in virgin females

a, Linear regression of maternal interaction and the number of remaining MPOA _Gal_+ cells in ablated virgin females. Animals are color coded by their behavior categories. Pearson correlation, N=23, P<0.05, R=0.46. b, Cumulative percentages of females that retrieved or attacked pups as a function of the percentage of remaining _Gal_+ cells, N=23. Reference cell number (100%) is the average MPOA _Gal_+ cell number in the control group. As the remaining number of _Gal_+ cells increases or decreases on the x-axis, each female is added to the maternal group or the infanticidal group according to its behavior type, respectively. c, Behavior of ablated females with over 50% ablation efficiency (N=15) compared to control (N=15). Chi-square test, P<0.05. d, Combined percentage of pups (out of two) retrieved by the ablation group as a function of time, compared to the controls. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P<0.05. e-h, Crouching, pup grooming, nest building and maternal interaction. Mean±SEM. Mann-Whitney test, *P<0.05.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Ablation of MPOA _Gal_+ neurons impairs paternal behavior in fathers

a, Linear regression of paternal interaction and number of remaining _Gal_+ cells in the MPOA in ablated fathers. Animals are color coded by their behavior categories. Pearson correlation, N=15, _P_=0.21, R=0.34. b, Cumulative percentages of paternal males (Retrieve) as a function of the percentage of remaining _Gal_+ cells, N=15. Reference cell number (100%) is the average MPOA _Gal_+ cell number in the control group. c, Behavior type of ablated fathers with over 50% ablation efficiency (N=14) compared to control (N=12). Fisher's exact test, **P<0.01. d, Combined percentage of pups retrieved (out of two) by the ablation group as a function of time, compared to the controls. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P<0.001. e-h, Crouching, pup grooming, nest building and paternal interaction. Mean±SEM, Mann-Whitney test, *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Optogenetic activation of MPOA _Gal_+ neurons in males suppresses attack and promotes pup grooming

a-b, Co-labeling Gal and ChR2:EYFP expression in the MPOA of the Gal::ChR2 and control males. c, Percentage of trials with attacks of pups by virgin males. Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni correction, ***P<0.001, ns. not significant. d, Percentage of pups attacked by each group of virgin males. Gal::ChR2 stim trials are significantly different from Gal::ChR2 no stim and control stim trials. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with Bonferroni correction, P<0.001. e, Pup grooming in the tests with virgin males. Mean±SEM; Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ns. not significant. f, Sample behavior raster plot of Gal::ChR2 stim and control stim trials in virgin males. Note that two behavior elements (such as pup grooming and handling) can occur simultaneously. g, Pup grooming in the tests of fathers. N=8 for each group, _t_-test pairing the same animal with and without light stimulation, ***P<0.001. h, Crouching in the tests of fathers. N=8, paired _t_-test, *P<0.05. i, Sample behavior raster plot of Gal::ChR2 stim and Gal::ChR2 no stim trials in tests with fathers.

Extended Data Figure 1

Extended Data Figure 1. Identification of the Gal as marker for cells involved in parenting and characterization of MPOA _Gal_+ cells

a, Enrichment ratio of markers in parenting induced MPOA c-fos in virgin females. The enrichment ratio of a given marker is calculated as the percentage of the _c-fos_+ cells co-expressing the marker, divided by the percentage of NeuN+ cells co-expressing this marker. b, The percentages of parenting induced MPOA _c-fos_+ cells co-expressing markers and the percentages of marker cells co-expressing c-fos. c, Percentages of _Gal_+ cells in the MPOA in virgin and sexually experienced males and females fail to identify any sexual dimorphism in MPOA Gal+ cell representation. Mean+SEM, one-way ANOVA, _P_>0.2. d, Fold increase of Gal mRNA in situ staining intensity compared to background in virgin females, virgin males and fathers. Gal mRNA expression is slightly higher (10% increase) in females than in males. Mean+SEM, one-way ANOVA, ***P<0.001, ns, not significant. **e**, **f**, Percentages of _c-fos_+ cells co-expressing _Gad1_ in fathers and virgin females. n.d., not determined. Mean+SEM, _t_-test, **_P_<0.01. **g**, **h**, Percentages of _Gal_+ cells co-expressing _Gad1_ in virgin males, fathers and virgin females. Mean+SEM, one-way ANOVA, _P_>0.1.

Extended Data Figure 2

Extended Data Figure 2. Targeted _Gal_+ cell ablation in the MPOA

a, Co-labeling of Gal and Cre expressing cells by mRNA in situ hybridization in Gal-Cre females indicates near perfect overlap. b, Schematic map of the Cre-dependent AAV-DTA virus; DTA is doubly flanked by two sets of incompatible lox sites and inverted to enable transcription after Cre-mediated recombination. c, Gal mRNA expression in the MPOA of ablated and control males. d, Number of MPOA _Gal_+ cells in ablation group compared to controls. Mean+SEM, _t-_test, ***P<0.001. **e**, Number of MPOA _Trh_+ cells in the ablation group and control. Mean+SEM, _t_-test, P>0.2. f-h, _Gal_+ cell numbers in the AVPe, anterior part of the PVN and the DMH in MPOA targeted ablation compared to control. Mean+SEM, _t_-test, P>0.1.

Extended Data Figure 3

Extended Data Figure 3. Females with MPOA _Gal_+ cell ablation compared to Gal-Cre+ controls injected with AAV-Flex-GFP

a, Behavior of MPOA _Gal_+ cell ablated virgin females with over 50% ablation efficiency (N=15) compared to Gal-Cre+ controls injected with AAV-Flex-GFP (N=13). Chi-square test, P<0.05. b, Percentage of pups retrieved by _Gal_+ cell ablated virgin females as a function of time compared to the controls. The retrieving data of the two pups in each test are combined. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P<0.05. c-f, Crouching, pup grooming, nest building and maternal interaction in the _Gal_+ cell ablated virgin females and control. Mean±SEM. Mann-Whitney test, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. The control females with the longest crouching and of nest building duration are different individuals.

Extended Data Figure 4

Extended Data Figure 4. Deficits in retrieving behavior of mothers with MPOA _Gal_+ cell ablation

a, Behavior of MPOA _Gal_+ cell ablated mothers (N=8) compared to controls (N=8). Fisher's exact test, P<0.05. b, Number of pups retrieved by each mother. Mean±SEM. Mann-Whitney test, *P<0.05. c, Percentage of pups retrieved by the ablation group as a function of time compared to the controls. The retrieving data of the four pups in each test are combined. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P<0.001.

Extended Data Figure 5

Extended Data Figure 5. Mating, inter-male aggression and locomotor activity of MPOA _Gal_+ cell ablated fathers

a-c, Locomotor behavior of MPOA _Gal_+ cell ablated and control fathers in a 5 min test in an open arena, measuring the distance moved, time spent in the center zone and the average velocity. Mean+SEM, _t_-test, _P_>0.3. d-f, Inter-male aggression of MPOA _Gal_+ cell ablated and control fathers, measuring duration of attack, latency to attack and duration of grooming the intruder. Mean±SEM. Mann-Whitney test, _P_>0.2. g-i, Duration of mounting, latency to mount and duration of mounting with pelvic thrust of MPOA _Gal_+ cell ablated fathers compared to controls. Mean±SEM. Mann-Whitney test, *P<0.05.

Extended Data Figure 6

Extended Data Figure 6. Parenting, mating and inter-male aggression of MPOA _Th_+ cell ablated fathers

a, Th mRNA expression in the MPOA of _Th_+ cell ablated and control fathers b, Number of MPOA _Th_+ cells in ablation group compared to controls. Mean+SEM, _t_-test, ***P<0.001. **c**, Number of AVPe _Th_+ cells in MPOA targeted ablation. Mean+SEM, _t_-test, _P_=0.07. **d**, The number of MPOA _Th_+ cell loss compared to the _Gal_+ cell ablation experiments. One male had a failed _Th_+ cell ablation and was removed from the dataset hereafter. The _Th_+ cell loss is ~87% of the _Gal_+ cell loss. **e**, Behavior type of MPOA _Th_+ cell ablated fathers compared to controls. Fisher's exact test, _P_>0.6. f, Combined percentage of pups (out of two) retrieved by the _Th_+ cell ablation group as a function of time compared to the controls. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, _P_>0.9. g-i, Crouching, pup grooming and nest building in the _Th_+ cell ablated fathers and control. Mean±SEM. Mann-Whitney test, _P_>0.2. The control male with the longest pup grooming also has the longest nest building activity, but not the longest duration of crouching. j-l, Duration of mounting, latency to mount and duration of mounting with pelvic thrust of MPOA _Th_+ cell ablated males compared to control in a mating assay. Mean±SEM. Mann-Whitney test, _P_>0.3. m-o, Duration of attack, latency to attack and duration of grooming the intruder in MPOA _Th_+ cell ablated males compared to control in an inter-male aggression assay. Mean±SEM. Mann-Whitney test, _P_>0.3.

Extended Data Figure 7

Extended Data Figure 7. Behavior raster plot of Gal::ChR2 and control virgin males with and without light illumination

Each row represents a single trial lasting for 5 min or until the male attacked the pup. Trials are grouped by experiment conditions and sorted by trial length. Roman numerals indicate the sample trials shown in Fig. 5f. Various elements of the behavior are color coded and labeled in the insert.

Extended Data Figure 8

Extended Data Figure 8. Behavior raster plot of mated Gal::ChR2 and control males with and without light illumination

Each row represents a 10-min trial. Trials are grouped by experiment conditions. Roman numerals indicate the sample trials shown in Fig. 5i. Various elements of the behavior are color coded and labeled in the insert.

Extended Data Figure 9

Extended Data Figure 9. Mating, inter-male aggression and locomotor activity of virgin males with MPOA _Gal_+ cell activation and controls of light stimulation and viral infection

a-c, Duration of mounting, latency to mount and duration of mounting with pelvic thrust in virgin males with _Gal_+ cell activation compared to controls in a mating assay. Paired _t_-test, _P_>0.7. d-f, Duration of attack, latency to attack and duration of grooming the intruder in virgin males with _Gal_+ cell activation compared to controls in an inter-male aggression assay. Paired _t-_test, *P<0.05, ns. not significant. **g**, Distance moved in virgin males with _Gal_+ cell activation compared to controls. Paired _t_-test, ***_P_<0.001. **h, i**, Time spent sniffing the intruder in mating and inter-male aggression assay. Paired _t_-test, _P_>0.6. j, The duration of light stimulation in each behavior test as a percentage of the total trial length. Mean+SEM, one-way ANOVA, _P_>0.6. k, The percentages of _Gal_+ and Gal/_c-fos_+ cells co-expressing fluorescent protein, in females injected with AAV5-Flex-ChR2-EYFP or AAV8-Flex-GFP after maternal interaction with pups. Mean+SEM, two-way ANOVA examining the differences in the infection of the two viruses and the two cell populations, _P_>0.2 for both factors and the interaction between them.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Numan M, Insel TR. The Neurobiology of Parental Behavior. Springer; 2003.
    1. Lonstein JS, De Vries GJ. Sex differences in the parental behavior of rodents. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2000;24:669–86. - PubMed
    1. Brown R. Hormonal and experiential factors influencing parental behaviour in male rodents: an integrative approach. Behavioural Processes. 1993;30:1–27. - PubMed
    1. Rosenblatt J. Nonhormonal basis of maternal behavior in the rat. Science. 1967;156:1512–1514. - PubMed
    1. Terkel J, Rosenblatt JS. Maternal behavior induced by maternal blood plasma injected into virgin rats. Journal of comparative and physiological psychology. 1968;65:479–82. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources