Most common 'sporadic' cancers have a significant germline genetic component - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2014 Nov 15;23(22):6112-8.

doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu312. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

Collaborators, Affiliations

Most common 'sporadic' cancers have a significant germline genetic component

Yi Lu et al. Hum Mol Genet. 2014.

Abstract

Common cancers have been demarcated into 'hereditary' or 'sporadic' ('non-hereditary') types historically. Such distinctions initially arose from work identifying rare, highly penetrant germline mutations causing 'hereditary' cancer. While rare mutations are important in particular families, most cases in the general population are 'sporadic'. Twin studies have suggested that many 'sporadic' cancers show little or no heritability. To quantify the role of germline mutations in cancer susceptibility, we applied a method for estimating the importance of common genetic variants (array heritability, h(2)g) to twelve cancer types. The following cancers showed a significant (P < 0.05) array heritability: melanoma USA set h(2)g = 0.19 (95% CI = 0.01-0.37) and Australian set h(2)g = 0.30 (0.10-0.50); pancreatic h(2)g = 0.18 (0.06-0.30); prostate h(2)g = 0.81 (0.32-1); kidney h(2)g = 0.18 (0.04-0.32); ovarian h(2)g = 0.30 (0.18-0.42); esophageal adenocarcinoma h(2)g = 0.24 (0.14-0.34); esophageal squamous cell carcinoma h(2)g = 0.19 (0.07-0.31); endometrial UK set h(2)g = 0.23 (0.01-0.45) and Australian set h(2)g = 0.39 (0.02-0.76). Three cancers showed a positive but non-significant effect: breast h(2) g = 0.13 (0-0.56); gastric h(2)g = 0.11 (0-0.27); lung h(2)g = 0.10 (0-0.24). One cancer showed a small effect: bladder h(2)g = 0.01 (0-0.11). Among these cancers, previous twin studies were only able to show heritability for prostate and breast cancer, but we can now make much stronger statements for several common cancers which emphasize the important role of genetic variants in cancer susceptibility. We have demonstrated that several 'sporadic' cancers have a significant inherited component. Larger genome-wide association studies in these cancers will continue to find more loci, which explain part of the remaining polygenic component.

© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roukos D.H., Murray S., Briasoulis E. Molecular genetic tools shape a roadmap towards a more accurate prognostic prediction and personalized management of cancer. Can. Biol. Ther. 2007;6:308–312. - PubMed
    1. Lichtenstein P., Holm N.V., Verkasalo P.K., Iliadou A., Kaprio J., Koskenvuo M., Pukkala E., Skytthe A., Hemminki K. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343:78–85. - PubMed
    1. Mack T.M., Hamilton A.S., Press M.F., Diep A., Rappaport E.B. Heritable breast cancer in twins. Br. J. Can. 2002;87:294–300. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schildkraut J.M., Risch N., Thompson W.D. Evaluating genetic association among ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer: evidence for a breast/ovarian cancer relationship. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1989;45:521–529. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hemminki K., Vaittinen P., Dong C., Easton D. Sibling risks in cancer: clues to recessive or X-linked genes? Br. J. Can. 2001;84:388–391. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources