Automated antibiotic susceptibility testing: comparative evaluation of four commercial systems and present state - PubMed (original) (raw)
Affiliations
- PMID: 2499440
Review
Automated antibiotic susceptibility testing: comparative evaluation of four commercial systems and present state
J Kiehlbauch et al. Clin Lab Med. 1989 Jun.
Abstract
Automation of AST has come quite some way and is here to stay. In particular, fully automated, "hands off" instruments have great appeal to laboratories with a limited number of well-trained and experienced clinical microbiology personnel. None of the evaluated instruments is perfect, but then neither are the standard or reference techniques. Overnight incubation has been the yardstick since the early days of in vitro AST. Given the usually shorter therapeutic intervals of 4- to 12-hour dosage schedules, it is quite possible that shorter incubation times for in vitro tests will become more of a standard. Until that time, newer, including automatic, techniques need to be evaluated against the more traditional standard methods. Quality control is critical, and since no systematic approach aside from individual manufacturers' suggestions exists, it should be developed by the NCCLS or similar agencies. Quality control might include standards for the evaluation of such equipment and systems because the development of new technology in this area will continue. Overall, reproducibility and accuracy of the instruments and methods evaluated were quite promising and should encourage well-designed studies of clinical correlation and relevance. The AMS equipment has been in use for routine AST in the clinical laboratories of the Seattle Veterans Administration Medical Center and the University of Washington Hospital. Because of its simplicity and flexibility, the Kirby-Bauer method continues to be an alternate technique for certain important clinical isolates, for instance, blood cultures in both laboratories. Finally, it should be remembered that the most critical function of all such equipment is the reliable detection of resistance.
Similar articles
- [Traditional and innovative diagnostic tools: when and why they should be applied].
Cancrini G, Iori A. Cancrini G, et al. Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):173-6. Parassitologia. 2004. PMID: 15305711 Review. Italian. - Systems approach to improving antimicrobial susceptibility testing in clinical laboratories in the United States.
Counts JM, Astles JR, Tenover FC, Hindler J. Counts JM, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Jul;45(7):2230-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00184-07. Epub 2007 May 23. J Clin Microbiol. 2007. PMID: 17522281 Free PMC article. - Antibiotic susceptibility testing accuracy. Review of the College of American Pathologists Microbiology Survey, 1972-1983.
Jones RN, Edson DC. Jones RN, et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1985 Jul;109(7):595-601. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1985. PMID: 3839359 - [Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory].
Suzuki K, Higuchi T. Suzuki K, et al. Kekkaku. 2007 Mar;82(3):217-27. Kekkaku. 2007. PMID: 17444126 Japanese. - Automation in clinical microbiology.
Woods GL. Woods GL. Am J Clin Pathol. 1992 Oct;98(4 Suppl 1):S22-30. Am J Clin Pathol. 1992. PMID: 1344700 Review.
Cited by
- Comparison of the E test and microdilution for detection of beta-lactam-resistant mutants that are stably derepressed for type I beta-lactamase.
Knapp CC, Washington JA. Knapp CC, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jan;30(1):214-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.214-215.1992. J Clin Microbiol. 1992. PMID: 1734054 Free PMC article. - Multicenter laboratory evaluation of the bioMérieux Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility testing system with 11 antimicrobial agents versus members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Doern GV, Brueggemann AB, Perla R, Daly J, Halkias D, Jones RN, Saubolle MA. Doern GV, et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):2115-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2115-2119.1997. J Clin Microbiol. 1997. PMID: 9230393 Free PMC article. - Developmental roadmap for antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems.
van Belkum A, Bachmann TT, Lüdke G, Lisby JG, Kahlmeter G, Mohess A, Becker K, Hays JP, Woodford N, Mitsakakis K, Moran-Gilad J, Vila J, Peter H, Rex JH, Dunne WM Jr; JPIAMR AMR-RDT Working Group on Antimicrobial Resistance and Rapid Diagnostic Testing. van Belkum A, et al. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019 Jan;17(1):51-62. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0098-9. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 30333569 Free PMC article. Review.