Structure of β-galactosidase at 3.2-Å resolution obtained by cryo-electron microscopy - PubMed (original) (raw)

Structure of β-galactosidase at 3.2-Å resolution obtained by cryo-electron microscopy

Alberto Bartesaghi et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014.

Abstract

We report the solution structure of Escherichia coli β-galactosidase (∼465 kDa), solved at ∼3.2-Å resolution by using single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). Densities for most side chains, including those of residues in the active site, and a catalytic Mg(2+) ion can be discerned in the map obtained by cryo-EM. The atomic model derived from our cryo-EM analysis closely matches the 1.7-Å crystal structure with a global rmsd of ∼0.66 Å. There are significant local differences throughout the protein, with clear evidence for conformational changes resulting from contact zones in the crystal lattice. Inspection of the map reveals that although densities for residues with positively charged and neutral side chains are well resolved, systematically weaker densities are observed for residues with negatively charged side chains. We show that the weaker densities for negatively charged residues arise from their greater sensitivity to radiation damage from electron irradiation as determined by comparison of density maps obtained by using electron doses ranging from 10 to 30 e(-)/Å(2). In summary, we establish that it is feasible to use cryo-EM to determine near-atomic resolution structures of protein complexes (<500 kDa) with low symmetry, and that the residue-specific radiation damage that occurs with increasing electron dose can be monitored by using dose fractionation tools available with direct electron detector technology.

Keywords: 3D reconstruction; CTF determination; frame alignment; single-particle EM; structure refinement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Cryo-EM density map of E. coli β-galactosidase at 3.2-Å resolution. (A) Surface representation of the density map derived by cryo-EM. The dimensions of the β-galactosidase tetramer are ∼180 Å x 140 Å x 87 Å. (B) Three different FSC plots to estimate resolution of the map shown in A. The curve in red shows the gold-standard FSC (24), with a value of 0.143 at 3.2-Å resolution, calculated between two independently refined halves of the dataset; the curve in blue shows the FSC (value of 0.5 at 3.6-Å resolution) calculated between the map in A and the map derived from the structure derived by X-ray crystallography PDB ID code 1DP0 (21); and the curve in green shows the FSC (value of 0.5 at 3.2-Å resolution) calculated between the map in A and the map derived from the cryo-EM–derived atomic model.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Atomic model for β-galactosidase tetramer derived by cryo-EM. (A) Cryo-EM map shown in surface representation with fitted atomic model of β-galactosidase. The four labeled protomers are colored magenta, black, green, and blue, respectively. The density corresponding to the 12 N-terminal residues of protomers 1 and 4 are shown in the boxed region to highlight the absence of these residues in 96% of the 57 available X-ray structures. (B) Zoomed in region of the dimer interface highlighted in A showing a superposition of the cryo-EM–derived atomic model derived de novo from the experimental density map (N1 and N4 shown in magenta and blue, respectively); the cryo-EM derived atomic model closely matches that derived in the X-ray models that report coordinates for this region (only 2 of the 57 reported structures).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Comparison of atomic models of E. coli β-galactosidase derived by X-ray crystallography at 1.7-Å resolution and by cryo-EM at 3.2-Å resolution. (A) X-ray structure of E. coli β-galactosidase (PDB ID code 1DP0; ref. 21) after alignment to the cryo-EM structure shown in ribbon representation colored according to rmsd values [ranging from blue (low) to red (high)]. Each chain was aligned separately in Chimera, using the default algorithm (Needleman–Wunsch in BLOSUM-62 Matrix). Highlighted areas shown as red spheres correspond to regions marked with asterisks (* and **) with rmsd values for Cα over 2 Å that are involved in crystal contacts (

Fig. S9

). (B_–_D) Local deviations between the atomic model derived from X-ray crystallography (Left in gray sticks) and the atomic model derived from cryo-EM (Right in light blue sticks) superimposed on the cryo-EM density map (mesh representation). Zones of protein-protein contacts in the crystal lattice including residues 179–189 (marked * in A) are shown in B, and the region including residues 310–320 (marked ** in A) is shown in C. Example of local deviations near residues 50–55, which are not involved in crystal contacts but located at the periphery of the enzyme is shown in D. In all examples, displacement of side chains and the backbone regions is visible.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Quality of cryo-EM–derived density map. Selected regions showing the fit of the derived atomic model to the cryo-EM density map (black mesh). Residues 849–856 in a β-strand (A), residues 395–405 in an α-helix (B), and residues 413–420 in the active site along with density for a Mg2+ ion partly coordinated by His-418 and Glu-416 (C).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Variation in observed side-chain densities between different types of residues. (A) Densities observed for a set of Arg, Lys, and His residues (shown in stick representation). (B) Comparison of densities observed for a set of Gln and Glu residues, as well as Asp residues to indicate preferential loss of density for the negatively charged side chains in comparison with the similarly sized, but neutral side chains. (C) Plot of normalized averaged map values (as detailed in

Fig. S12

), shown for each residue type when only buried residues are considered (hatched bars) or when all residues including buried and exposed varieties are considered (filled bars). Buried residues are defined as those where <30% of their maximum possible surface area is exposed to solvent.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Differential dose-dependent radiation damage. Side-chain densities for selected Glu and Asp residues are shown to illustrate the effects of radiation damage by comparison of maps obtained with progressively higher total electron doses. Density maps were derived by using the first 8, 16, or 24 frames (Top, Middle, and Bottom), corresponding to 10, 20, or 30 e−/Å2 total dose, respectively. In comparison with Arg and Leu side chains (illustrated using Arg-52 and Leu-7 as examples), Glu and Asp side chains (illustrated by using Glu-67, Glu-243, and Asp-96) are much more sensitive to radiation damage showing increased loss of density (26%, 22%, and 10% for Glu-67, Glu-243, and Asp-96, respectively) with an increase in dose from 10 to 30 e−/Å2 (see also

Fig. S12

for a quantitative analysis of residue-specific radiation damage at different dose levels).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen JZ, et al. Molecular interactions in rotavirus assembly and uncoating seen by high-resolution cryo-EM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(26):10644–10648. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu X, et al. Structural changes in a marine podovirus associated with release of its genome into Prochlorococcus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17(7):830–836. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mills DJ, Vitt S, Strauss M, Shima S, Vonck J. De novo modeling of the F420-reducing [NiFe]-hydrogenase from a methanogenic archaeon by cryo-electron microscopy. eLife. 2013;2:e00218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Settembre EC, Chen JZ, Dormitzer PR, Grigorieff N, Harrison SC. Atomic model of an infectious rotavirus particle. EMBO J. 2011;30(2):408–416. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Subramaniam S, Henderson R. Molecular mechanism of vectorial proton translocation by bacteriorhodopsin. Nature. 2000;406(6796):653–657. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources