Understanding Positive Play: An Exploration of Playing Experiences and Responsible Gambling Practices - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 2015 Dec;31(4):1715-34.
doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9489-7.
Affiliations
- PMID: 25209455
- DOI: 10.1007/s10899-014-9489-7
Comparative Study
Understanding Positive Play: An Exploration of Playing Experiences and Responsible Gambling Practices
Richard T A Wood et al. J Gambl Stud. 2015 Dec.
Abstract
This study is one of the first to explore in detail the behaviors, attitudes and motivations of players that show no signs of at-risk or problem gambling behavior (so-called 'positive players'). Via an online survey, 1484 positive players were compared with 209 problem players identified using the Lie/Bet screen. The study identified two distinct groups of positive players defined according to their motivations to play and their engagement with responsible gambling (RG) practices. Those positive players that played most frequently employed the most personal RG strategies. Reasons that positive players gave for gambling were focused on leisure (e.g., playing for fun, being entertained, and/or winning a prize). By contrast, problem gamblers were much more focused upon modifying mood states (e.g., excitement, relaxation, depression and playing when bored or upset). The present study also suggests that online gambling is not, by default, inherently riskier than gambling in more traditional ways, as online gambling was the most popular media by which positive players gambled. Furthermore, most positive players reported that it was easier to stick to their limits when playing the National Lottery online compared to traditional retail purchasing of tickets. Problem players were significantly more likely than positive players to gamble with family and friends, suggesting that, contrary to a popular RG message, social play may not be inherently safer than gambling alone. It is proposed that players (generally) may identify more with the term 'positive play' than the term 'RG' which is frequently interpreted as being aimed at people with gambling problems, rather than all players.
Keywords: Gambling prevention strategies; Harm minimization; Positive play; Problem gambling; Responsible gambling.
Similar articles
- [Internet gambling: what are the risks?].
Bonnaire C. Bonnaire C. Encephale. 2012 Feb;38(1):42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Apr 8. Encephale. 2012. PMID: 22381723 Review. French. - Video lottery: winning expectancies and arousal.
Ladouceur R, Sévigny S, Blaszczynski A, O'Connor K, Lavoie ME. Ladouceur R, et al. Addiction. 2003 Jun;98(6):733-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00412.x. Addiction. 2003. PMID: 12780361 Clinical Trial. - Increased Urge to Gamble Following Near-Miss Outcomes May Drive Purchasing Behaviour in Scratch Card Gambling.
Stange M, Graydon C, Dixon MJ. Stange M, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2017 Sep;33(3):867-879. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9662-2. J Gambl Stud. 2017. PMID: 28013478 Free PMC article. - Probing the Role of Digital Payment Solutions in Gambling Behavior: Preliminary Results From an Exploratory Focus Group Session With Problem Gamblers.
Lakew N, Jonsson J, Lindner P. Lakew N, et al. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jul 23;11:e54951. doi: 10.2196/54951. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 39042438 Free PMC article. - Gamble with Your Head and Not Your Heart: A Conceptual Model for How Thinking-Style Promotes Irrational Gambling Beliefs.
Armstrong T, Rockloff M, Browne M. Armstrong T, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):183-206. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09927-z. J Gambl Stud. 2020. PMID: 31912382 Review.
Cited by
- Gambling Harm-Minimisation Tools and Their Impact on Gambling Behaviour: A Review of the Empirical Evidence.
Riley BJ, Oakes J, Lawn S. Riley BJ, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 30;21(8):998. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21080998. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39200609 Free PMC article. Review. - Can Positive Play Deficits Explain the Associations Between Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, Gambling Motives, and Problem Gambling? Results of a National U.S. Sample.
King A, Kraus SW, Wong-Padoongpatt G, Grubbs JB. King A, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jul 30. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10348-w. Online ahead of print. J Gambl Stud. 2024. PMID: 39080051 - Exploring the Differences in Positive Play among Various Sports Wagering Behaviors.
Connolly AJ, Stall LM, Floyd CG, Kraus SW, Grubbs JB. Connolly AJ, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2024 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10304-8. Online ahead of print. J Gambl Stud. 2024. PMID: 38652388 - Anticipated Motives for Gambling Treatment in Adults from the U.S.
Grant Weinandy JT, Connolly A, Floyd C, Kraus SW, Grubbs JB. Grant Weinandy JT, et al. J Gambl Stud. 2024 Sep;40(3):1585-1605. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10287-6. Epub 2024 Feb 24. J Gambl Stud. 2024. PMID: 38400890 Free PMC article. - The protective effects of cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on gambling disorder are mediated by risk aversion and responsible gambling attitude.
Zhou H, Wu AMS. Zhou H, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05509-5. BMC Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38254048 Free PMC article.
References
- Addiction. 2002 May;97(5):487-99 - PubMed
- Psychol Rep. 2004 Dec;95(3 Pt 1):1009-13 - PubMed
- J Gambl Stud. 2005 Winter;21(4):503-20 - PubMed
- Cyberpsychol Behav. 2009 Aug;12(4):413-21 - PubMed
- J Gambl Stud. 2004 Fall;20(3):301-17 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical