Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation - PubMed (original) (raw)
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
Larissa Shamseer et al. BMJ. 2015.
Free article
Erratum in
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] BMJ. 2016 Jul 21;354:i4086. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4086. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27444514 No abstract available.
Abstract
Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct, enable readers to assess for the presence of selective reporting against completed reviews, and, when made publicly available, reduce duplication of efforts and potentially prompt collaboration. Evidence documenting the existence of selective reporting and excessive duplication of reviews on the same or similar topics is accumulating and many calls have been made in support of the documentation and public availability of review protocols. Several efforts have emerged in recent years to rectify these problems, including development of an international register for prospective reviews (PROSPERO) and launch of the first open access journal dedicated to the exclusive publication of systematic review products, including protocols (BioMed Central's Systematic Reviews). Furthering these efforts and building on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, an international group of experts has created a guideline to improve the transparency, accuracy, completeness, and frequency of documented systematic review and meta-analysis protocols--PRISMA-P (for protocols) 2015. The PRISMA-P checklist contains 17 items considered to be essential and minimum components of a systematic review or meta-analysis protocol.This PRISMA-P 2015 Explanation and Elaboration paper provides readers with a full understanding of and evidence about the necessity of each item as well as a model example from an existing published protocol. This paper should be read together with the PRISMA-P 2015 statement. Systematic review authors and assessors are strongly encouraged to make use of PRISMA-P when drafting and appraising review protocols.
© BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2014.
Similar articles
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA; PRISMA-P Group. Moher D, et al. Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25554246 Free PMC article. - The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Soll RF, et al. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834 - The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. Liberati A, et al. BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19622552 Free PMC article. - The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. Liberati A, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jul 23. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19631507 - The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. Liberati A, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):W65-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136. Epub 2009 Jul 20. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19622512
Cited by
- Prevalence and factors associated with the perpetration and victimization of teen dating violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Ribeiro NQ, de Mendonça CR, da Costa WP, Terra LF, da Cruz RVP, Sorpreso ICE, Noll PRES, Noll M. Ribeiro NQ, et al. MethodsX. 2024 Oct 10;13:103003. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103003. eCollection 2024 Dec. MethodsX. 2024. PMID: 39507383 Free PMC article. - Intramedullary nail fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of adult diaphyseal forearm fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Box MW, Stegelmann SD, Domingue GA, Wells ME, Werthmann NJ, Potgieter CJ, Riehl JT. Box MW, et al. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 4;19(1):719. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05158-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39497147 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources