Memantine monotherapy for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Memantine monotherapy for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shinji Matsunaga et al. PLoS One. 2015.

Abstract

Background: We performed an updated meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials testing memantine monotherapy for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Methods: The meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials of memantine monotherapy for AD, omitting those in which patients were also administered a cholinesterase inhibitor. Cognitive function, activities of daily living, behavioral disturbances, global function, stage of dementia, drug discontinuation rate, and individual side effects were compared between memantine monotherapy and placebo groups. The primary outcomes were cognitive function and behavioral disturbances; the others were secondary outcomes.

Results: Nine studies including 2433 patients that met the study's inclusion criteria were identified. Memantine monotherapy significantly improved cognitive function [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI)=-0.39 to -0.14, p=0.0001], behavioral disturbances (SMD=-0.12, 95% CI=-0.22 to -0.01, p=0.03), activities of daily living (SMD=-0.09, 95% CI=-0.19 to -0.00, p=0.05), global function assessment (SMD=-0.18, 95% CI=-0.27 to -0.09, p=0.0001), and stage of dementia (SMD=-0.23, 95% CI=-0.33 to -0.12, p=0.0001) scores. Memantine was superior to placebo in terms of discontinuation because of inefficacy [risk ratio (RR)=0.36, 95% CI=0.17¬ to 0.74, p=0.006, number needed to harm (NNH)=non significant]. Moreover, memantine was associated with less agitation compared with placebo (RR=0.68, 95% CI=0.49 to 0.94, p=0.02, NNH=non significant). There were no significant differences in the rate of discontinuation because of all causes, all adverse events, and individual side effects other than agitation between the memantine monotherapy and placebo groups.

Conclusions: Memantine monotherapy improved cognition, behavior, activities of daily living, global function, and stage of dementia and was well-tolerated by AD patients. However, the effect size in terms of efficacy outcomes was small and thus there is limited evidence of clinical benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Dr. Matsunaga has received speaker’s honoraria from Eisai, Janssen, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono, Eli Lilly, Takeda, and Otsuka. Dr. Kishi has received speaker’s honoraria from Abbott, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Yoshitomi, Otsuka, Meiji, Shionogi, Janssen, Novartis, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, and Pfizer. Dr. Iwata has received speaker’s honoraria from Astellas, Dainippon Sumitomo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Yoshitomi, Otsuka, Meiji, Shionogi, Novartis, and Pfizer. All authors declare that they have no direct conflicts of interest relevant to this study. No grants or other funding sources were used for this study. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1

Fig 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram.

Fig 2

Fig 2. Risk of bias assessment.

Fig 3

Fig 3. Forest plot of cognitive function (9 comparisons, n = 2409).

*Negative SMD values favor memantine; positive SMD values favor placebo.†RR < 1 favors memantine; RR > 1 favors placebo.

Fig 4

Fig 4. Forest plot of behavioral disturbances (9 comparisons, n = 2358).

*Negative SMD values favor memantine; positive SMD values favor placebo.†RR < 1 favors memantine; RR > 1 favors placebo.

Fig 5

Fig 5. Forest plot of activity of daily living (7 comparisons, n = 1954).

*Negative SMD values favor memantine; positive SMD values favor placebo.†RR < 1 favors memantine; RR > 1 favors placebo.

Fig 6

Fig 6. Forest plot of global function assessment (7 comparisons, n = 2270).

*Negative SMD values favor memantine; positive SMD values favor placebo.†RR < 1 favors memantine; RR > 1 favors placebo.

Fig 7

Fig 7. Forest plot of stage of dementia (5 comparisons, n = 1376).

*Negative SMD values favor memantine; positive SMD values favor placebo.†RR < 1 favors memantine; RR > 1 favors placebo.

Fig 8

Fig 8. Forest plot of discontinuation due to all causes (9 studies, n = 2433).

*Negative SMD values favor memantine; positive SMD values favor placebo.†RR < 1 favors memantine; RR > 1 favors placebo.

Fig 9

Fig 9. Forest plot of discontinuation due to adverse events (7 studies, n = 2371).

*Negative SMD values favor memantine; positive SMD values favor placebo.†RR < 1 favors memantine; RR > 1 favors placebo.

Fig 10

Fig 10. Forest plot of discontinuation due to inefficacy (4 studies, n = 1372).

*Negative SMD values favor memantine; positive SMD values favor placebo.†RR < 1 favors memantine; RR > 1 favors placebo.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ittner LM, Gotz J. Amyloid-beta and tau—a toxic pas de deux in Alzheimer's disease. Nature reviews Neuroscience. 2011;12(2):65–72. Epub 2011/01/05. 10.1038/nrn2967 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kishi T, Iwata N. NMDA receptor antagonists interventions in schizophrenia: Meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Journal of psychiatric research. 2013;47(9):1143–9. Epub 2013/05/23. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.04.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berman K, Brodaty H, Withall A, Seeher K. Pharmacologic treatment of apathy in dementia. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry: official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. 2012;20(2):104–22. Epub 2011/08/16. 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31822001a6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Danysz W, Parsons CG. The NMDA receptor antagonist memantine as a symptomatological and neuroprotective treatment for Alzheimer's disease: preclinical evidence. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2003;18(Suppl 1):S23–32. Epub 2003/09/16. 10.1002/gps.938 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McShane R, Areosa Sastre A, Minakaran N. Memantine for dementia. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2006;(2):CD003154 10.1002/14651858.CD003154.pub5 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.

LinkOut - more resources