Drinking Patterns in US Counties From 2002 to 2012 - PubMed (original) (raw)

Drinking Patterns in US Counties From 2002 to 2012

Laura Dwyer-Lindgren et al. Am J Public Health. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: We estimated the prevalence of any drinking and binge drinking from 2002 to 2012 and heavy drinking from 2005 to 2012 in every US county.

Methods: We applied small area models to Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. These models incorporated spatial and temporal smoothing and explicitly accounted for methodological changes to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System during this period.

Results: We found large differences between counties in all measures of alcohol use: in 2012, any drinking prevalence ranged from 11.0% to 78.7%, heavy drinking prevalence ranged from 2.4% to 22.4%, and binge drinking prevalence ranged from 5.9% to 36.0%. Moreover, there was wide variation in the proportion of all drinkers who engaged in heavy or binge drinking. Heavy and binge drinking prevalence increased in most counties between 2005 and 2012, but the magnitude of change varied considerably.

Conclusions: There are large differences within the United States in levels and recent trends in alcohol use. These estimates should be used as an aid in designing and implementing targeted interventions and to monitor progress toward reducing the burden of excessive alcohol use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—

FIGURE 1—

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey questions on alcohol: United States, 2002–2012. Note. Vertical lines demarcate years when question text changed. Red is used to highlight the portions of the text unique to a given version of the question.

FIGURE 2—

FIGURE 2—

Age-standardized alcohol use prevalence of (a) any drinking, (b) heavy drinking, and (c) binge drinking: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2012.

FIGURE 3—

FIGURE 3—

Ratio of male to female age-standardized alcohol use prevalence of (a) any drinking, (b) heavy drinking, and (c) binge drinking: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2012.

FIGURE 4—

FIGURE 4—

Age-standardized prevalence among all alcohol users of (a) heavy drinking and (b) binge drinking: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2012.

FIGURE 5—

FIGURE 5—

Change in age-standardized alcohol use prevalence of (a) any drinking, (b) heavy drinking, and (c) binge drinking: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2005–2012.

FIGURE 6—

FIGURE 6—

Change in age-standardized alcohol use prevalence, by gender, of (a) any drinking, (b) heavy drinking, and (c) binge drinking: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2005–2012. Note. Counties with more than 25% decline or more than 100% increase in drinking prevalence are not included.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Corrao G, Rubbiati L, Bagnardi V, Zambon A, Poikolainen K. Alcohol and coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2000;95(10):1505–1523. - PubMed
    1. Corrao G, Bagnardi V, Zambon A, La Vecchia C. A meta-analysis of alcohol consumption and the risk of 15 diseases. Prev Med. 2004;38(5):613–619. - PubMed
    1. Patra J, Taylor B, Irving H et al. Alcohol consumption and the risk of morbidity and mortality for different stroke types—a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:258. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rehm J, Baliunas D, Borges GLG et al. The relation between different dimensions of alcohol consumption and burden of disease: an overview. Addiction. 2010;105(5):817–843. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rehm J, Taylor B, Mohapatra S et al. Alcohol as a risk factor for liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29(4):437–445. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources