Chronic Trichuris muris Infection in C57BL/6 Mice Causes Significant Changes in Host Microbiota and Metabolome: Effects Reversed by Pathogen Clearance - PubMed (original) (raw)

Chronic Trichuris muris Infection in C57BL/6 Mice Causes Significant Changes in Host Microbiota and Metabolome: Effects Reversed by Pathogen Clearance

Ashley Houlden et al. PLoS One. 2015.

Abstract

Trichuris species are a globally important and prevalent group of intestinal helminth parasites, in which Trichuris muris (mouse whipworm) is an ideal model for this disease. This paper describes the first ever highly controlled and comprehensive investigation into the effects of T. muris infection on the faecal microbiota of mice and the effects on the microbiota following successful clearance of the infection. Communities were profiled using DGGE, 454 pyrosequencing, and metabolomics. Changes in microbial composition occurred between 14 and 28 days post infection, resulting in significant changes in α and β- diversity. This impact was dominated by a reduction in the diversity and abundance of Bacteroidetes, specifically Prevotella and Parabacteroides. Metabolomic analysis of stool samples of infected mice at day 41 showed significant differences to uninfected controls with a significant increase in the levels of a number of essential amino acids and a reduction in breakdown of dietary plant derived carbohydrates. The significant reduction in weight gain by infected mice probably reflects these metabolic changes and the incomplete digestion of dietary polysaccharides. Following clearance of infection the intestinal microbiota underwent additional changes gradually transitioning by day 91 towards a microbiota of an uninfected animal. These data indicate that the changes in microbiota as a consequence of infection were transitory requiring the presence of the pathogen for maintenance. Interestingly this was not observed for all of the key immune cell populations associated with chronic T. muris infection. This reflects the highly regulated chronic response and potential lasting immunological consequences of dysbiosis in the microbiota. Thus infection of T. muris causes a significant and substantial impact on intestinal microbiota and digestive function of mice with affects in long term immune regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1

Fig 1. Experimental design:

Sample timepoints and treatments for monitoring the intestinal microbiota during and after drug clearance of T.muris infection.

Fig 2

Fig 2. Impact of T.muris infection on microbial communities assessed by DGGE:

NMDS analysis of bacterial community profiling in stool samples by 16S rRNA gene DGGE comparing day 0 to day 41 (○ & ◻) in infected (red) and non infected (blue) individual mice. Demonstrating a significant shift as a result of time and infection (F1,16 = 9.05, p = 0.002). Axis represent scale for Euclidian distance between samples centred on zero, Stress indicates the quality of fit of data (>0.2 is a good fit).

Fig 3

Fig 3. Time course monitoring of microbial communities by DGGE after antihelmintic treatment to clear infection:

NMDS plots of DGGE analysis of bacterial communities of the 16S RNA gene in stool samples. Monitoring the change over time as a result of prolonged infection and clearance by antihelmithic treatment at a) day 41, b) day 47, c) day 63, d) day 77, e) day 91, f) The pairwise comparisons of treatments for significant differences assessed by PERMANOVA with bonferroni corrected p values < 0.0083. Axis represent scale for Euclidian distance between samples centred on zero, Stress indicates the quality of fit of data (>0.2 is a good fit).

Fig 4

Fig 4. Shannon diversity from 454 pyrosequencing of stool samples over time:

Microbial diversity was measured between treatments at each time point in individual stool samples from rarfied pyrosequecing OTU tables at 97% sequence similarity level. NA = naïve, NH naïve antihelminthic treated, IH = infected antihelminthic treated, IF = Infected. The labels a,b and c denoting samples significantly different tested by ANOVA (p = 0.05) with post hoc TukeyHSD tests as required.

Fig 5

Fig 5. Shannon diversity of specific bacterial phyla in treatments from 454 pyrosequencing of stool samples:

Microbial diversity was assessed for a) Bacteroidetes, b) Firmicutes, and c) Proteobacteria between treatments at each time point in individual stool samples from rarefied pyrosequecing OTU tables at 97% sequence similarity level. NA = naïve, NH naïve antihelmintic treated, IH = infected antihelmintic treated, IF = Infected. The labels a,b and c denoting samples significantly different tested by ANOVA (p = 0.05) with TukeyHSD tests as required.

Fig 6

Fig 6. NMDS analysis of bacterial communities in stool samples assessed by 454 pyrosequencing at individual time-points:

Comparisons were made between the groups Naïve, naïve antihelminthic treated, infected antihelminthic treated and Infected, in order of dark blue, light blue, orange, red. a) Day 0 there were no significant differences, b) day 28 & c) day 41, naïve and naïve antihelminthic treated were significantly different to infected and infected antihelminthic treated (p < 0.0083), D91 all significantly different (p < 0.0083). Axis represent scale for Euclidian distance between samples centred on zero, Stress indicates the quality of fit of data (>0.2 is a good fit).

Fig 7

Fig 7. Impact of infection by T.muris on bacterial community composition:

Bacterial community proportions of Prevotella and Parabacteroides were identified as significantly altered as a result of treatment in relation to time, and a level of recovery as a result of antihelmintic treatment of Prevotella populations. NA = naïve, NH naïve antihelmintic treated, IH = infected antihelmintic treated, IF = Infected. The labels a and b denoting samples significantly different tested by ANOVA (p = 0.05) with post hoc TukeyHSD tests as required.

Fig 8

Fig 8. Impact of T. muris infection of mouse growth:

At day 91 there is a treatment impact (F3,21 = 9.04, p <0.001) which TukeyHSD tests identified as naïve gaining more weight than infected and infected antihelmintic treated (p <0.001 and 0.01 respectively). Naive antihelmintic treated were not different to naïve, but significantly higher than infected (p = 0.03). NA = naïve, NH naïve antihelmintic treated, IH = infected antihelmintic treated, IF = Infected. Arrow indicates point of antihelmintic treatment.

References

    1. Helminth control in school-age children A guide for managers for control programmes. World Health Organisation; 2011. Available: http://www.schoolsandhealth.org/Documents/Helminthcontrolinschool-agedch....
    1. Cliffe LJ, Grencis RK. The Trichuris muris system: a paradigm of resistance and susceptibility to intestinal nematode infection. Adv Parasitol. 2004;57: 255–307. - PubMed
    1. Panesar TS, Croll NA. The location of parasites within their hosts: site selection by Trichuris muris in the laboratory mouse. Int J Parasitol. 1980;10: 261–273. - PubMed
    1. Klementowicz JE, Travis MA, Grencis RK. Trichuris muris: a model of gastrointestinal parasite infection. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34: 815–828. 10.1007/s00281-012-0348-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Artis D. Epithelial-cell recognition of commensal bacteria and maintenance of immune homeostasis in the gut. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8: 411–420. 10.1038/nri2316 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources