Demic and cultural diffusion propagated the Neolithic transition across different regions of Europe - PubMed (original) (raw)
Demic and cultural diffusion propagated the Neolithic transition across different regions of Europe
Joaquim Fort. J R Soc Interface. 2015.
Abstract
The Neolithic transition is the shift from hunting–gathering into farming. About 9000 years ago, the Neolithic transition began to spread from the Near East into Europe, until it reached Northern Europe about 5500 years ago. There are two main models of this spread. The demic model assumes that it was mainly due to the reproduction and dispersal of farmers. The cultural model assumes that European hunter-gatherers become farmers by acquiring domestic plants and animals, as well as knowledge, from neighbouring farmers. Here we use the dates of about 900 archaeological sites to compute a speed map of the spread of the Neolithic transition in Europe. We compare the speed map to the speed ranges predicted by purely demic, demic-cultural and purely cultural models. The comparison indicates that the transition was cultural in Northern Europe, the Alpine region and west of the Black Sea. But demic diffusion was at work in other regions such as the Balkans and Central Europe. Our models can be applied to many other cultural traits. We also propose that genetic data could be gathered and used to measure the demic kernels of Early Neolithic populations. This would lead to an enormous advance in Neolithic spread modelling.
Figures
Figure 1.
Isochrone map. The spread of the Neolithic transition, obtained by interpolating the dates in calibrated years before present (BP) of 918 Early Neolithic sites (circles) in Europe and the Near East (see the electronic supplementary material for details on the dataset and interpolation). Map created with ArcGIS 10.
Figure 2.
Directional map of the Neolithic wave of advance. Local speed vectors are shown. The corresponding local speed magnitudes, computed along the front propagation direction, are shown in figure 3. Map created with ArcGIS 10 and the Spatial Analyst extension.
Figure 3.
Demic versus cultural diffusion. In the red regions, the Neolithic spread was slow and due to cultural diffusion. In the yellow regions, the spread was faster and dominated by demic diffusion. In the blue regions, the speed was still faster and either demic or cultural diffusion could have dominated (this conclusion is due to parameter uncertainty). Note that some regions contain none or just a few sites and are thus highly uncertain, e.g. the yellow/blue/green area in Belorussia (upper right) and some scattered continental areas with very fast speeds (green). Map created with ArcGIS 10 and the Spatial Analyst extension.
Similar articles
- Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia.
Fort J, Mercè Pareta M, Sørensen L. Fort J, et al. J R Soc Interface. 2018 Nov 21;15(148):20180597. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0597. J R Soc Interface. 2018. PMID: 30464058 Free PMC article. - Complete mitochondrial genomes reveal neolithic expansion into Europe.
Fu Q, Rudan P, Pääbo S, Krause J. Fu Q, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032473. Epub 2012 Mar 13. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22427842 Free PMC article. - Archaeological expansions in tropical South America during the late Holocene: Assessing the role of demic diffusion.
Gregorio de Souza J, Alcaina Mateos J, Madella M. Gregorio de Souza J, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 27;15(4):e0232367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232367. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32339209 Free PMC article. - Iberia: population genetics, anthropology, and linguistics.
Arnaiz-Villena A, Martínez-Laso J, Alonso-García J. Arnaiz-Villena A, et al. Hum Biol. 1999 Oct;71(5):725-43. Hum Biol. 1999. PMID: 10510567 Review. - Paleogenomics of the prehistory of Europe: human migrations, domestication and disease.
Serrano JG, Ordóñez AC, Fregel R. Serrano JG, et al. Ann Hum Biol. 2021 May;48(3):179-190. doi: 10.1080/03014460.2021.1942205. Ann Hum Biol. 2021. PMID: 34459342 Review.
Cited by
- Reassessing the role of climate change in the Tupi expansion (South America, 5000-500 BP).
Gregorio de Souza J, Noelli FS, Madella M. Gregorio de Souza J, et al. J R Soc Interface. 2021 Oct;18(183):20210499. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0499. Epub 2021 Oct 6. J R Soc Interface. 2021. PMID: 34610263 Free PMC article. - Inferring language dispersal patterns with velocity field estimation.
Yang S, Sun X, Jin L, Zhang M. Yang S, et al. Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 2;15(1):190. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44430-5. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38167834 Free PMC article. - FADS1 and the Timing of Human Adaptation to Agriculture.
Mathieson S, Mathieson I. Mathieson S, et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Dec 1;35(12):2957-2970. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy180. Mol Biol Evol. 2018. PMID: 30272210 Free PMC article. - Multi-layered population structure in Island Southeast Asians.
Mörseburg A, Pagani L, Ricaut FX, Yngvadottir B, Harney E, Castillo C, Hoogervorst T, Antao T, Kusuma P, Brucato N, Cardona A, Pierron D, Letellier T, Wee J, Abdullah S, Metspalu M, Kivisild T. Mörseburg A, et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Nov;24(11):1605-1611. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.60. Epub 2016 Jun 15. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016. PMID: 27302840 Free PMC article. - Beyond broad strokes: sociocultural insights from the study of ancient genomes.
Racimo F, Sikora M, Vander Linden M, Schroeder H, Lalueza-Fox C. Racimo F, et al. Nat Rev Genet. 2020 Jun;21(6):355-366. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-0218-z. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Nat Rev Genet. 2020. PMID: 32127690 Review.
References
- Childe VG. 1925. The dawn of European civilization. London, UK: Kegan Paul.
- Edmonson MS. 1961. Neolithic diffusion rates. Curr. Anthropol. 2, 71–102. (10.1086/200169) - DOI
- Ammerman AJ, Cavalli-Sforza LL. 1984. The Neolithic transition and the Genetics of populations in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Ammerman AJ, Cavalli-Sforza LL. 1971. Measuring the rate of spread of early farming in Europe. Man 6, 674–688. (10.2307/2799190) - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources