Long-term Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux - PubMed (original) (raw)
Clinical Trial
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
Steven A Edmundowicz 2, Paul A Taiganides 3, John C Lipham 4, C Daniel Smith 5, Kenneth R DeVault 6, Santiago Horgan 7, Garth Jacobsen 7, James D Luketich 8, Christopher C Smith 9, Steven C Schlack-Haerer 10, Shanu N Kothari 11, Christy M Dunst 12, Thomas J Watson 13, Jeffrey Peters 14, Brant K Oelschlager 15, Kyle A Perry 16, Scott Melvin 16, Willem A Bemelman 17, André J P M Smout 18, Dan Dunn 19
Affiliations
- PMID: 26044316
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.028
Clinical Trial
Long-term Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux
Robert A Ganz et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May.
Abstract
Background & aims: Based on results from year 2 of a 5-year trial, in 2012 the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of a magnetic device to augment lower esophageal sphincter function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We report the final results of 5 years of follow-up evaluation of patients who received this device.
Methods: We performed a prospective study of the safety and efficacy of a magnetic device in 100 adults with GERD for 6 months or more, who were partially responsive to daily proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and had evidence of pathologic esophageal acid exposure, at 14 centers in the United States and The Netherlands. The magnetic device was placed using standard laparoscopic tools and techniques. Eighty-five subjects were followed up for 5 years to evaluate quality of life, reflux control, use of PPIs, and side effects. The GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire was administered at baseline to patients on and off PPIs, and after placement of the device; patients served as their own controls. A partial response to PPIs was defined as a GERD-HRQL score of 10 or less on PPIs and a score of 15 or higher off PPIs, or a 6-point or more improvement when scores on vs off PPI were compared.
Results: Over the follow-up period, no device erosions, migrations, or malfunctions occurred. At baseline, the median GERD-HRQL scores were 27 in patients not taking PPIs and 11 in patients on PPIs; 5 years after device placement this score decreased to 4. All patients used PPIs at baseline; this value decreased to 15.3% at 5 years. Moderate or severe regurgitation occurred in 57% of subjects at baseline, but only 1.2% at 5 years. All patients reported the ability to belch and vomit if needed. Bothersome dysphagia was present in 5% at baseline and in 6% at 5 years. Bothersome gas-bloat was present in 52% at baseline and decreased to 8.3% at 5 years.
Conclusions: Augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter with a magnetic device provides significant and sustained control of reflux, with minimal side effects or complications. No new safety risks emerged over a 5-year follow-up period. These findings validate the long-term safety and efficacy of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device for patients with GERD. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00776997.
Keywords: Clinical Trial; Heartburn; Hiatal Hernia; Surgery.
Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
- Adverse Events After Implantation of a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux.
Bielefeldt K. Bielefeldt K. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Oct;14(10):1507-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 10. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27178660 No abstract available. - Reply.
Ganz RA. Ganz RA. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Oct;14(10):1508. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 9. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27291353 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center.
Bonavina L, Saino G, Bona D, Sironi A, Lazzari V. Bonavina L, et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Oct;217(4):577-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.039. Epub 2013 Jul 12. J Am Coll Surg. 2013. PMID: 23856355 - Laparoscopic sphincter augmentation device eliminates reflux symptoms and normalizes esophageal acid exposure: one- and 2-year results of a feasibility trial.
Bonavina L, DeMeester T, Fockens P, Dunn D, Saino G, Bona D, Lipham J, Bemelman W, Ganz RA. Bonavina L, et al. Ann Surg. 2010 Nov;252(5):857-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fd879b. Ann Surg. 2010. PMID: 21037442 Clinical Trial. - Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux at 5 Years: Final Results of a Pilot Study Show Long-Term Acid Reduction and Symptom Improvement.
Saino G, Bonavina L, Lipham JC, Dunn D, Ganz RA. Saino G, et al. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Oct;25(10):787-92. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0394. Epub 2015 Oct 5. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015. PMID: 26437027 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - A Modern Magnetic Implant for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Ganz RA. Ganz RA. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Sep;15(9):1326-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.019. Epub 2016 Dec 24. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28025156 Review. - Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A, Asti E, Bernardi D, Bonitta G, Rausa E, Siboni S, Bonavina L. Aiolfi A, et al. Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.041. Epub 2018 Feb 20. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29471155 Review.
Cited by
- Current Advances in Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Surgical Interventions for the Management of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD): An Update.
Ganesh Shashi B, Hafsa SN. Ganesh Shashi B, et al. Cureus. 2024 Sep 9;16(9):e69001. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69001. eCollection 2024 Sep. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39385893 Free PMC article. Review. - Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: New Insights and Treatment Approaches.
Tanvir F, Nijjar GS, Aulakh SK, Kaur Y, Singh S, Singh K, Singla A, Sandhu APS, Luthra S, Antaal H. Tanvir F, et al. Cureus. 2024 Aug 24;16(8):e67654. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67654. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39314570 Free PMC article. Review. - The Cost Effectiveness of Adjunctive Treatments for Proton Pump Inhibitor-Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Rosas US, Almario CV, Yu KS, Spiegel BMR. Rosas US, et al. Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Sep;44(9):703-714. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01387-7. Epub 2024 Sep 7. Clin Drug Investig. 2024. PMID: 39243348 Free PMC article. - Magnetic sphincter augmentation in the management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fadel MG, Tarazi M, Dave M, Reddy M, Khan O, Fakih-Gomez N, Ashrafian H, Fehervari M. Fadel MG, et al. Int J Surg. 2024 May 9;110(10):6355-66. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001558. Online ahead of print. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38729117 Free PMC article. - MAGNETIC SPHINCTER AUGMENTATION DEVICE FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: EFFECTIVE, BUT POSTOPERATIVE DYSPHAGIA AND RISK OF EROSION SHOULD NOT BE UNDERESTIMATED. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
Valinoti AC, Angeramo CA, Dreifuss N, Herbella FAM, Schlottmann F. Valinoti AC, et al. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024 Mar 4;36:e1781. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020230063e1781. eCollection 2024. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024. PMID: 38451590 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical