Framing 'fracking': Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom - PubMed (original) (raw)

Framing 'fracking': Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing in the United Kingdom

Laurence Williams et al. Public Underst Sci. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

The prospect of fracking in the United Kingdom has been accompanied by significant public unease. We outline how the policy debate is being framed by UK institutional actors, finding evidence of a dominant discourse in which the policy approach is defined through a deficit model of public understanding of science and in which a technical approach to feasibility and safety is deemed as sufficient grounds for good policymaking. Deploying a deliberative focus group methodology with lay publics across different sites in the north of England, we find that these institutional framings are poorly aligned with participants' responses. We find that unease regularly overflows the focus on safety and feasibility and cannot be satisfactorily explained by a lack of understanding on the part of participants. We find that scholarship from science and technology studies productively elucidates our participants' largely sceptical positions, and orientates strategies for responding to them more effectively.

Keywords: fracking; framing risk; lay expertise; participation in science policy; public engagement; risk perception; shale gas.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Andrews IJ. (2013) The carboniferous Bowland Shale gas study: Geology and resource estimation. British Geological Survey for Department of Energy and Climate Change. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil... (accessed 11 September 2013).
    1. Andrews IJ. (2014) The Jurassic shales of the Weald Basin: Geology and shale oil and shale gas resource estimation. British Geological Survey for Department of Energy and Climate Change. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bgs-weald-basin-jurassic-shal... (accessed 5 January 2015).
    1. Barbour R. (2007) Doing Focus Groups. London: SAGE.
    1. Boudet H, Clarke C, Bugden D, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A. (2014) ‘Fracking’ controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy 65: 57–67.
    1. Broderick J, Anderson K. (2012) Has US shale gas reduced CO2 emissions? Examining recent changes in emissions from the US power sector and traded fossil fuels. A report commissioned by The Co-operative and undertaken by researchers at the Tyndall Centre, University of Manchester; Available at: http://tyndall.ac.uk/sites/default/files/broderick_and_anderson_2012_imp... (accessed 10 September 2013).

LinkOut - more resources