Cultural variation is part of human nature : Literary universals, context-sensitivity, and "shakespeare in the bush" - PubMed (original) (raw)

Cultural variation is part of human nature : Literary universals, context-sensitivity, and "shakespeare in the bush"

Michelle Scalise Sugiyama. Hum Nat. 2003 Dec.

Abstract

In 1966, Laura Bohannan wrote her classic essay challenging the supposition that great literary works speak to universal human concerns and conditions and, by extension, that human nature is the same everywhere. Her evidence: the Tiv of West Africa interpret Hamlet differently from Westerners. While Bohannan's essay implies that cognitive universality and cultural variation are mutually exclusive phenomena, adaptationist theory suggests otherwise. Adaptive problems ("the human condition") and cognitive adaptations ("human nature") are constant across cultures. What differs between cultures is habitat: owing to environmental variation, the means and information relevant to solving adaptive problems differ from place to place. Thus, we find differences between cultures not because human minds differ in design but largely because human habitats differ in resources and history. On this view, we would expect world literature to express both human universals and cultural particularities. Specifically, we should expect to find literary universality at the macro level (e.g., adaptive problems, cognitive adaptations) and literary variation at the micro level (e.g., local solutions to adaptive problems).

Keywords: Bohannan; Context-sensitivity; Cultural relativism; Folklore universals; Hamlet; Human nature; Human universals; Literary universals; Narrative theory; Storytelling; Tiv.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• ["I am but mad north-north-west"--Hamlet's portrayed delusion].
  Schulte Herbrüggen H. Schulte Herbrüggen H. Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother. 1996;44(1):89-103. Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother. 1996. PMID: 8686369 German.
• Patterns of characterization in folktales across geographic regions and levels of cultural complexity : Literature as a neglected source of quantitative data.
  Gottschall J, Berkey R, Cawson M, Drown C, Fleischner M, Glotzbecker M, Kernan K, Magnan T, Muse K, Ogburn C, Patterson S, Skeels C, Joseph SS, Weeks S, Welsh A, Welch E. Gottschall J, et al. Hum Nat. 2003 Dec;14(4):365-82. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1011-3. Hum Nat. 2003. PMID: 26190271
• The factor of local cultural specificity and process of globalization.
  Rudnev V. Rudnev V. Coll Antropol. 2012 Dec;36(4):1135-8. Coll Antropol. 2012. PMID: 23390802
• Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars.
  Atran S. Atran S. Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Aug;21(4):547-69; discussion 569-609. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x98001277. Behav Brain Sci. 1998. PMID: 10097021 Review.
• Current Perspectives in the Study of Personality Across Cultures.
  Timothy Church A. Timothy Church A. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;5(4):441-9. doi: 10.1177/1745691610375559. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010. PMID: 26162190 Review.

Cited by

• The phylogeny of Little Red Riding Hood.
  Tehrani JJ. Tehrani JJ. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e78871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078871. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24236061 Free PMC article.

References

1. 1. Science. 1974 Sep 13;185(4155):949-51 - PubMed
2. 1. Psychol Bull. 1989 Mar;105(2):260-75 - PubMed
3. 1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987;499:29-46 - PubMed
4. 1. Hum Nat. 1996 Dec;7(4):403-25 - PubMed
5. 1. Nature. 1998 Nov 26;396(6709):321-2 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Springer