Pioglitazone Use and Risk of Bladder Cancer and Other Common Cancers in Persons With Diabetes - PubMed (original) (raw)

. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):265-77.

doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7996.

Laurel A Habel 2, Charles P Quesenberry 2, Brian L Strom 3, Tiffany Peng 2, Monique M Hedderson 2, Samantha F Ehrlich 2, Ronac Mamtani 1, Warren Bilker 4, David J Vaughn 5, Lisa Nessel 6, Stephen K Van Den Eeden 2, Assiamira Ferrara 2

Affiliations

Pioglitazone Use and Risk of Bladder Cancer and Other Common Cancers in Persons With Diabetes

James D Lewis et al. JAMA. 2015.

Abstract

Importance: Studies suggest pioglitazone use may increase risk of cancers.

Objective: To examine whether pioglitazone use for diabetes is associated with risk of bladder and 10 additional cancers.

Design, setting, and participants: Cohort and nested case-control analyses among persons with diabetes. A bladder cancer cohort followed 193,099 persons aged 40 years or older in 1997-2002 until December 2012; 464 case patients and 464 matched controls were surveyed about additional confounders. A cohort analysis of 10 additional cancers included 236,507 persons aged 40 years or older in 1997-2005 and followed until June 2012. Cohorts were from Kaiser Permanente Northern California.

Exposures: Ever use, duration, cumulative dose, and time since initiation of pioglitazone as time dependent.

Main outcomes and measures: Incident cancer, including bladder, prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectum, and melanoma.

Results: Among 193,099 persons in the bladder cancer cohort, 34,181 (18%) received pioglitazone (median duration, 2.8 years; range, 0.2-13.2 years) and 1261 had incident bladder cancer. Crude incidences of bladder cancer in pioglitazone users and nonusers were 89.8 and 75.9 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Ever use of pioglitazone was not associated with bladder cancer risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.89-1.26). Results were similar in case-control analyses (pioglitazone use: 19.6% among case patients and 17.5% among controls; adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.78-1.80). In adjusted analyses, there was no association with 8 of the 10 additional cancers; ever use of pioglitazone was associated with increased risk of prostate cancer (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.26) and pancreatic cancer (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.16-1.71). Crude incidences of prostate and pancreatic cancer in pioglitazone users vs nonusers were 453.3 vs 449.3 and 81.1 vs 48.4 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. No clear patterns of risk for any cancer were observed for time since initiation, duration, or dose.

Conclusions and relevance: Pioglitazone use was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of bladder cancer, although an increased risk, as previously observed, could not be excluded. The increased prostate and pancreatic cancer risks associated with ever use of pioglitazone merit further investigation to assess whether they are causal or are due to chance, residual confounding, or reverse causality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources