The Skeletal Muscle Anabolic Response to Plant- versus Animal-Based Protein Consumption - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
. 2015 Sep;145(9):1981-91.
doi: 10.3945/jn.114.204305. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
Affiliations
- PMID: 26224750
- DOI: 10.3945/jn.114.204305
Free article
Review
The Skeletal Muscle Anabolic Response to Plant- versus Animal-Based Protein Consumption
Stephan van Vliet et al. J Nutr. 2015 Sep.
Free article
Abstract
Clinical and consumer market interest is increasingly directed toward the use of plant-based proteins as dietary components aimed at preserving or increasing skeletal muscle mass. However, recent evidence suggests that the ingestion of the plant-based proteins in soy and wheat results in a lower muscle protein synthetic response when compared with several animal-based proteins. The possible lower anabolic properties of plant-based protein sources may be attributed to the lower digestibility of plant-based sources, in addition to greater splanchnic extraction and subsequent urea synthesis of plant protein-derived amino acids compared with animal-based proteins. The latter may be related to the relative lack of specific essential amino acids in plant- as opposed to animal-based proteins. Furthermore, most plant proteins have a relatively low leucine content, which may further reduce their anabolic properties when compared with animal proteins. However, few studies have actually assessed the postprandial muscle protein synthetic response to the ingestion of plant proteins, with soy and wheat protein being the primary sources studied. Despite the proposed lower anabolic properties of plant vs. animal proteins, various strategies may be applied to augment the anabolic properties of plant proteins. These may include the following: 1) fortification of plant-based protein sources with the amino acids methionine, lysine, and/or leucine; 2) selective breeding of plant sources to improve amino acid profiles; 3) consumption of greater amounts of plant-based protein sources; or 4) ingesting multiple protein sources to provide a more balanced amino acid profile. However, the efficacy of such dietary strategies on postprandial muscle protein synthesis remains to be studied. Future research comparing the anabolic properties of a variety of plant-based proteins should define the preferred protein sources to be used in nutritional interventions to support skeletal muscle mass gain or maintenance in both healthy and clinical populations.
Keywords: aging; animal protein; exercise; muscle mass; plant protein; vegetarian.
© 2015 American Society for Nutrition.
Similar articles
- The Role of the Anabolic Properties of Plant- versus Animal-Based Protein Sources in Supporting Muscle Mass Maintenance: A Critical Review.
Berrazaga I, Micard V, Gueugneau M, Walrand S. Berrazaga I, et al. Nutrients. 2019 Aug 7;11(8):1825. doi: 10.3390/nu11081825. Nutrients. 2019. PMID: 31394788 Free PMC article. Review. - Characterising the muscle anabolic potential of dairy, meat and plant-based protein sources in older adults.
Gorissen SHM, Witard OC. Gorissen SHM, et al. Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 Feb;77(1):20-31. doi: 10.1017/S002966511700194X. Epub 2017 Aug 29. Proc Nutr Soc. 2018. PMID: 28847314 Review. - Ingestion of Wheat Protein Increases In Vivo Muscle Protein Synthesis Rates in Healthy Older Men in a Randomized Trial.
Gorissen SH, Horstman AM, Franssen R, Crombag JJ, Langer H, Bierau J, Respondek F, van Loon LJ. Gorissen SH, et al. J Nutr. 2016 Sep;146(9):1651-9. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.231340. Epub 2016 Jul 20. J Nutr. 2016. PMID: 27440260 Clinical Trial. - The Muscle Protein Synthetic Response to the Ingestion of a Plant-Derived Protein Blend Does Not Differ from an Equivalent Amount of Milk Protein in Healthy Young Males.
Pinckaers PJM, Kouw IWK, Gorissen SHM, Houben LHP, Senden JM, Wodzig WKHW, de Groot LCPGM, Verdijk LB, Snijders T, van Loon LJC. Pinckaers PJM, et al. J Nutr. 2023 Jan 14;152(12):2734-2743. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxac222. J Nutr. 2023. PMID: 36170964 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion.
Pinckaers PJM, Trommelen J, Snijders T, van Loon LJC. Pinckaers PJM, et al. Sports Med. 2021 Sep;51(Suppl 1):59-74. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01540-8. Epub 2021 Sep 13. Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34515966 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- Postprandial plasma aminoacidemia and indices of appetite regulation following pea-rice blend, pea isolate and whey protein ingestion in healthy young adults.
Rogers LM, Belfield AE, Korzepa M, Gritsas A, Churchward-Venne TA, Breen L. Rogers LM, et al. Br J Nutr. 2024 Sep 28;132(6):691-700. doi: 10.1017/S0007114524001958. Epub 2024 Oct 10. Br J Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39387207 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - A Diet Containing Animal Source Protein as Fresh, Lean Beef Is More Well Liked and Promotes Healthier Eating Behavior Compared with Plant-Based Alternatives in Women with Overweight.
Braden ML, Gwin JA, Leidy HJ. Braden ML, et al. Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Jul 14;8(8):104415. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104415. eCollection 2024 Aug. Curr Dev Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39224138 Free PMC article. - Protein and Amino Acid Adequacy and Food Consumption by Processing Level in Vegans in Brazil.
Leitão AE, Esteves GP, Mazzolani BC, Smaira FI, Santini MH, Santo André HC, Gualano B, Roschel H. Leitão AE, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418226. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18226. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38913373 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical