Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2015 Sep;12(9):1940-50.
doi: 10.1111/jsm.12970. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
Affiliations
- PMID: 26272778
- DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12970
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia
James M Cantor et al. J Sex Med. 2015 Sep.
Abstract
Introduction: The phallometric test has been examined most widely in the literature with regard to its ability to detect pedophilia; however, it has become of increasing interest to clinicians and researchers to ascertain to what extent the test accurately detects hebephilia: Whereas pedophilia refers to an adult's sexual interest in prepubescent children (age 10 or younger, on average), hebephilia refers to an adult's sexual interest in pubescent children (ages 11-14, on average).
Aim: The aim of this study was to estimate the accuracy of volumetric phallometry in distinguishing pedophilic men and hebephilic men from men who are teleiophilic (primarily sexually interested in adults, age 17 or older).
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on the cumulate database of a large phallometric laboratory and clinic to identify a group of 239 men who committed sexual offenses against extrafamilial adults age 17 or older and a group of 996 men who committed sexual offenses against extrafamilial children age 14 or younger, all of whom professed a greater sexual interest in adults over children.
Main outcome measures: The sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test is calculated for its accuracy in distinguishing sexual preferences for children spanning various age ranges.
Results: Receiver operator characteristic curves were highly significant for each classification decision: Using its previously established cut-point of +0.25 standard deviation (SD) units, the phallometric test detected hebephilia with a sensitivity and specificity of 70.0% and 90.7%, detected pedophilia with 46.9% and 100%, and detected pedohebephilia with 75.3% and 90.7%. At a new cut-point of +0.0 SD units, the sensitivity and specificity of the test for pedophilia was 71.9% and 95.3%.
Conclusions: Volumetric phallometry significantly distinguishes teleiophilic sex offenders from each of pedophilic, hebephilic, and pedohebephilic sex offenders and can serve as a reliable diagnostic test of sexual age preference among men who deny sexual interest in children.
Keywords: Diagnostic Tests; Hebephilia; Paraphilia; Pedohebephilia; Pedophilia; Penile Plethysmography; Phallometry.
© 2015 International Society for Sexual Medicine.
Comment in
- Editorial Comment on "Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia".
Fedoroff P. Fedoroff P. J Sex Med. 2015 Sep;12(9):1951-2. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12989. Epub 2015 Sep 9. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 26350724 No abstract available. - Accuracy Is Important-Re: Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia.
Moser C. Moser C. J Sex Med. 2015 Dec;12(12):2501. doi: 10.1111/jsm.13026. Epub 2015 Nov 3. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 26531144 No abstract available. - Research Methods, Statistical Analysis, and the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia: Response to Fedoroff.
Cantor JM. Cantor JM. J Sex Med. 2015 Dec;12(12):2499-500. doi: 10.1111/jsm.13040. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 26696226 No abstract available. - In His Own Words: Response to Moser.
Cantor JM. Cantor JM. J Sex Med. 2015 Dec;12(12):2502-3. doi: 10.1111/jsm.13075. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 26696227 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) May Be a Measure of Pedohebephilia.
Stephens S, Seto MC, Cantor JM, Lalumière ML. Stephens S, et al. J Sex Med. 2019 Oct;16(10):1655-1663. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 22. J Sex Med. 2019. PMID: 31447378 - Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V.
Blanchard R, Lykins AD, Wherrett D, Kuban ME, Cantor JM, Blak T, Dickey R, Klassen PE. Blanchard R, et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Jun;38(3):335-50. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9399-9. Epub 2008 Aug 7. Arch Sex Behav. 2009. PMID: 18686026 - Evidence of Construct Validity in the Assessment of Hebephilia.
Stephens S, Seto MC, Goodwill AM, Cantor JM. Stephens S, et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Jan;46(1):301-309. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0907-z. Epub 2016 Nov 29. Arch Sex Behav. 2017. PMID: 27900492 - Validity in Phallometric Testing for Sexual Interests in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review.
McPhail IV, Hermann CA, Fernane S, Fernandez YM, Nunes KL, Cantor JM. McPhail IV, et al. Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):535-551. doi: 10.1177/1073191117706139. Epub 2017 Apr 28. Assessment. 2019. PMID: 28454493 Review. - Measuring Pedophilic Sexual Interest.
Carvalho J, Bradford J, Murphy L, Briken P, Fedoroff P. Carvalho J, et al. J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):378-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Jan 10. J Sex Med. 2020. PMID: 31932255 Review.
Cited by
- The Prevalence of Sexual Interest in Children and Sexually Harmful Behavior Self-Reported by Men Recruited Through an Online Crowdsourcing Platform.
Ó Ciardha C, Ildeniz G, Karoğlu N. Ó Ciardha C, et al. Sex Abuse. 2022 Mar;34(2):207-226. doi: 10.1177/10790632211013811. Epub 2021 May 15. Sex Abuse. 2022. PMID: 33993798 Free PMC article. - International overview of phallometric testing for sexual offending behaviour and sexual risk.
Bickle A, Cameron C, Hassan T, Safdar H, Khalifa N. Bickle A, et al. BJPsych Int. 2021 Nov;18(4):E11. doi: 10.1192/bji.2021.17. BJPsych Int. 2021. PMID: 34747938 Free PMC article. Review. - A Peek into Their Mind? An Exploration of Links Between Offense-Supportive Statements and Behaviors among Men Who Sexually Exploit Children and Adolescents Online.
Paquette S, Fortin F. Paquette S, et al. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2023 May;67(6-7):591-617. doi: 10.1177/0306624X211013523. Epub 2021 May 6. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2023. PMID: 33957790 Free PMC article. - Validating the Screening Scale of Pedophilic Crime Scene Behavior.
Lehmann RJB, Brouillette-Alarie S, Pedneault A, Knight RA. Lehmann RJB, et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Nov;51(8):4085-4096. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02354-z. Epub 2022 Jul 27. Arch Sex Behav. 2022. PMID: 35896938 Free PMC article. - Assessing Paraphilic Interests Among Women Who Sexually Offend.
Bouchard KN, Moulden HM, Lalumière ML. Bouchard KN, et al. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Nov 18;21(12):121. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1112-2. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019. PMID: 31741145 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical