App Usage Factor: A Simple Metric to Compare the Population Impact of Mobile Medical Apps - PubMed (original) (raw)
Comparative Study
. 2015 Aug 19;17(8):e200.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.4284.
Affiliations
- PMID: 26290093
- PMCID: PMC4642395
- DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4284
Comparative Study
App Usage Factor: A Simple Metric to Compare the Population Impact of Mobile Medical Apps
Thomas Lorchan Lewis et al. J Med Internet Res. 2015.
Abstract
Background: One factor when assessing the quality of mobile apps is quantifying the impact of a given app on a population. There is currently no metric which can be used to compare the population impact of a mobile app across different health care disciplines.
Objective: The objective of this study is to create a novel metric to characterize the impact of a mobile app on a population.
Methods: We developed the simple novel metric, app usage factor (AUF), defined as the logarithm of the product of the number of active users of a mobile app with the median number of daily uses of the app. The behavior of this metric was modeled using simulated modeling in Python, a general-purpose programming language. Three simulations were conducted to explore the temporal and numerical stability of our metric and a simulated app ecosystem model using a simulated dataset of 20,000 apps.
Results: Simulations confirmed the metric was stable between predicted usage limits and remained stable at extremes of these limits. Analysis of a simulated dataset of 20,000 apps calculated an average value for the app usage factor of 4.90 (SD 0.78). A temporal simulation showed that the metric remained stable over time and suitable limits for its use were identified.
Conclusions: A key component when assessing app risk and potential harm is understanding the potential population impact of each mobile app. Our metric has many potential uses for a wide range of stakeholders in the app ecosystem, including users, regulators, developers, and health care professionals. Furthermore, this metric forms part of the overall estimate of risk and potential for harm or benefit posed by a mobile medical app. We identify the merits and limitations of this metric, as well as potential avenues for future validation and research.
Keywords: mHealth; medical app; medical informatics apps; metric; mobile app; mobile health; mobile phone; patient safety; population impact; risk assessment.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: TLL is a writer and editor for iMedicalApps.com, a website dedicated toward providing news on the integration of mobile technology into medical care and the reviewing of medical apps for mobile devices. He does not consult nor receive reimbursement from app developers or creators. JW has no competing interests to declare.
Figures
Figure 1
A contour plot illustrating the stability of the app usage factor as a function of Au and Du, including determination of metric limits.
Figure 2
A combined scatterplot (input data, left) and histogram (relative frequency of both Au and Du, right) showing the initial sample dataset of 20,000 mobile medical apps.
Figure 3
A histogram showing the frequency distribution of the app usage factor for the sample dataset of 20,000 simulated mobile medical apps, including mean and standard deviation for the data.
Figure 4
A graph showing app usage factor as a function of time for a single mobile app which is subject to a number of simulated app ecosystem events.
Similar articles
- Assessment of Mobile Health Apps Using Built-In Smartphone Sensors for Diagnosis and Treatment: Systematic Survey of Apps Listed in International Curated Health App Libraries.
Baxter C, Carroll JA, Keogh B, Vandelanotte C. Baxter C, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 3;8(2):e16741. doi: 10.2196/16741. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32012102 Free PMC article. - mHealth and mobile medical Apps: a framework to assess risk and promote safer use.
Lewis TL, Wyatt JC. Lewis TL, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 15;16(9):e210. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3133. J Med Internet Res. 2014. PMID: 25223398 Free PMC article. - Who is Tracking Health on Mobile Devices: Behavioral Logfile Analysis in Hong Kong.
Guan L, Peng TQ, Zhu JJH. Guan L, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 23;7(5):e13679. doi: 10.2196/13679. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 31120429 Free PMC article. - Mobile Health Apps on COVID-19 Launched in the Early Days of the Pandemic: Content Analysis and Review.
Ming LC, Untong N, Aliudin NA, Osili N, Kifli N, Tan CS, Goh KW, Ng PW, Al-Worafi YM, Lee KS, Goh HP. Ming LC, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e19796. doi: 10.2196/19796. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32609622 Free PMC article. Review. - Challenges With Developing Secure Mobile Health Applications: Systematic Review.
Aljedaani B, Babar MA. Aljedaani B, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 21;9(6):e15654. doi: 10.2196/15654. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34152277 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
- A Mobile Health Solution Complementing Psychopharmacology-Supported Smoking Cessation: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Carrasco-Hernandez L, Jódar-Sánchez F, Núñez-Benjumea F, Moreno Conde J, Mesa González M, Civit-Balcells A, Hors-Fraile S, Parra-Calderón CL, Bamidis PD, Ortega-Ruiz F. Carrasco-Hernandez L, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 27;8(4):e17530. doi: 10.2196/17530. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32338624 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. - Associations of Health App Use and Perceived Effectiveness in People With Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes: Population-Based Survey.
Ernsting C, Stühmann LM, Dombrowski SU, Voigt-Antons JN, Kuhlmey A, Gellert P. Ernsting C, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 28;7(3):e12179. doi: 10.2196/12179. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 30920383 Free PMC article. - How Do Apps Work? An Analysis of Physical Activity App Users' Perceptions of Behavior Change Mechanisms.
Hoj TH, Covey EL, Jones AC, Haines AC, Hall PC, Crookston BT, West JH. Hoj TH, et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 3;5(8):e114. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7206. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017. PMID: 28778846 Free PMC article. - Feasibility Study of a Mobile Health Intervention for Older Adults on Oral Anticoagulation Therapy.
Lee JA, Evangelista LS, Moore AA, Juth V, Guo Y, Gago-Masague S, Lem CG, Nguyen M, Khatibi P, Baje M, Amin AN. Lee JA, et al. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2016 Oct 7;2:2333721416672970. doi: 10.1177/2333721416672970. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2016. PMID: 28680940 Free PMC article.
References
- Lupton D. Apps as artefacts: towards a critical perspective on mobile health and medical apps. Societies. 2014 Oct 29;4(4):606–622. doi: 10.3390/soc4040606. - DOI
- Free C, Phillips G, Watson L, Galli L, Felix L, Edwards P, Patel V, Haines A. The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013 Jan;10(1):e1001363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363 PMEDICINE-D-12-00641 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
- Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e128. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1994. http://www.jmir.org/2012/5/e128/ v14i5e128 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
- Lewis TL, Wyatt JC. mHealth and mobile medical apps: a framework to assess risk and promote safer use. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(9):e210. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3133. http://www.jmir.org/2014/9/e210/ v16i9e210 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical