A comparison of surgical procedures and postoperative cares for minimally invasive laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy in gastric cancer - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

. 2015 Jul 15;8(7):10321-9.

eCollection 2015.

Affiliations

• PMID: 26379823
• PMCID: PMC4565206

Review

A comparison of surgical procedures and postoperative cares for minimally invasive laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy in gastric cancer

Hong-Na Tang et al. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015.

Abstract

Minimally invasive, laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has assumed an ever-expanding role in gastric cancer treatment. Accumulating data so far seem to suggest that LG is at least a viable alternative of conventional open gastrectomy (OG) in different contexts. However, even though reviews and meta-analyses have compared the advantages and limitations of each option, it is still controversial whether LG is a better alternative to OG, especially in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The major goal of this study is to evaluate the readouts of LG, in comparison with OG. A literature search was performed for studies published from 2009 to 2013. Medical records of 20868 gastric cancer patients from 32 independent studies were reviewed and analyzed. All 32 studies concluded that LG is at least comparable with OG. LG is superior to OG in offering less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and lower risk of complications, although LG is probably inferior in operative time, and not different from OG in mortality. Considering the merits and the potential future technical improvement, it is reasonable to speculate that LG may eventually replace OG in most clinical contexts.

Keywords: Minimally invasive laparoscopic gastrectomy; gastric cancer; open gastrectomy; postoperative cares.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• [Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer : Operative and postoperative results].
  Raakow J, Denecke C, Chopra S, Fritz J, Hofmann T, Andreou A, Thuss-Patience P, Pratschke J, Biebl M. Raakow J, et al. Chirurg. 2020 Mar;91(3):252-261. doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-01053-1. Chirurg. 2020. PMID: 31654103 German.
• Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Cancer: Cut Down Complications to Unveil Positive Results of Minimally Invasive Approach.
  Bjelovic M, Veselinovic M, Gunjic D, Bukumiric Z, Babic T, Vlajic R, Potkonjak D. Bjelovic M, et al. Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 4;12:854408. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.854408. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35311139 Free PMC article.
• Totally Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Matched Pair Analysis.
  Ludwig K, Schneider-Koriath S, Scharlau U, Steffen H, Möller D, Bernhardt J. Ludwig K, et al. Zentralbl Chir. 2018 Apr;143(2):145-154. doi: 10.1055/a-0586-9275. Epub 2018 May 2. Zentralbl Chir. 2018. PMID: 29719906 English.
• Laparoscopy versus open surgery for advanced and resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
  Martínez-Ramos D, Miralles-Tena JM, Cuesta MA, Escrig-Sos J, Van der Peet D, Hoashi JS, Salvador-Sanchís JL. Martínez-Ramos D, et al. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011 Mar;103(3):133-41. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082011000300005. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011. PMID: 21434716 Review.
• Laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: Risk factors associated with conversion and a systematic analysis of literature.
  Liao G, Wen S, Xie X, Wu Q. Liao G, et al. Int J Surg. 2016 Oct;34:17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Aug 17. Int J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27543820 Review.

Cited by

• Recent developments and innovations in gastric cancer.
  Mihmanli M, Ilhan E, Idiz UO, Alemdar A, Demir U. Mihmanli M, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2016 May 7;22(17):4307-20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i17.4307. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27158199 Free PMC article. Review.
• Proteomic characterization of gastric cancer response to chemotherapy and targeted therapy reveals new therapeutic strategies.
  Li Y, Xu C, Wang B, Xu F, Ma F, Qu Y, Jiang D, Li K, Feng J, Tian S, Wu X, Wang Y, Liu Y, Qin Z, Liu Y, Qin J, Song Q, Zhang X, Sujie A, Huang J, Liu T, Shen K, Zhao JY, Hou Y, Ding C. Li Y, et al. Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 29;13(1):5723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33282-0. Nat Commun. 2022. PMID: 36175412 Free PMC article.
• The development of prognostic gene markers associated with disulfidptosis in gastric cancer and their application in predicting drug response.
  Liu X, Ou J. Liu X, et al. Heliyon. 2024 Feb 13;10(4):e26013. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26013. eCollection 2024 Feb 29. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38384541 Free PMC article.
• A Review of Research Progress in Multidrug-Resistance Mechanisms in Gastric Cancer.
  Ruan T, Liu W, Tao K, Wu C. Ruan T, et al. Onco Targets Ther. 2020 Feb 28;13:1797-1807. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S239336. eCollection 2020. Onco Targets Ther. 2020. PMID: 32184615 Free PMC article. Review.

References

1. 1. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4:146–148. - PubMed
2. 1. Goh P, Kum CK. Laparoscopic Billroth II gastrectomy: a review. Surg Oncol. 1993;2:13–18. - PubMed
3. 1. Shim JH, Oh SI, Yoo HM, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy: a matched-cohort study. Am J Surg. 2013;206:346–351. - PubMed
4. 1. Kwon HY, Hyung WJ, Lee JH, Lee SK, Noh SH. Outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy after endoscopic treatment for gastric cancer: a comparison with open gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer. 2013;13:51–57. - PMC - PubMed
5. 1. Kim HS, Kim BS, Lee IS, Lee S, Yook JH, Kim BS. Comparison of totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;34:323–331. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Europe PubMed Central
  • PubMed Central

• Miscellaneous

  • NCI CPTAC Assay Portal