Analysis of online patient education materials in pediatric ophthalmology - PubMed (original) (raw)
Analysis of online patient education materials in pediatric ophthalmology
Ann M John et al. J AAPOS. 2015 Oct.
Abstract
Background: Patients increasingly consult online resources for healthcare information. The American Medical Association (AMA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommend that online education resources be written between a 3rd- and 7th-grade level. This study assesses whether online health information abides by these guidelines.
Methods: Ten pediatric ophthalmology conditions were entered into a commonly used search engine, Google.com, and analyzed using 10 validated readability scales. Scientific articles and articles written on patient forums were excluded. The 10 conditions--amblyopia, cataract, conjunctivitis, corneal abrasion, nystagmus, retinoblastoma, retinopathy of prematurity, strabismus, stye, and glaucoma--were also searched and analyzed separately from widely used websites, including Wikipedia and WebMD, as well as those of professional societies, including the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) and the American Optometric Association (AOA).
Results: The majority of articles were written above recommended guidelines. All scales showed that the 100 articles were written at a mean grade-level of 11.75 ± 2.72. Only 12% of articles were written below a 9th-grade level and only 3% met recommended criteria. The articles accrued separately from Wikipedia, WebMD, AAPOS, and AOA also had average grade levels above the recommended guidelines.
Conclusions: The readability of online patient education material exceeds NIH and AMA guidelines. This disparity can adversely affect caregiver comprehension of such resources and contribute to poor decision making. Pediatric ophthalmology online articles are generally written at a level too high for average caregiver comprehension. Revision of articles can increase satisfaction, improve outcomes, and facilitate the patient-ophthalmologist relationship.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
- Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
Huang G, Fang CH, Agarwal N, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD. Huang G, et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 25654639 - Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.
Eltorai AE, Han A, Truntzer J, Daniels AH. Eltorai AE, et al. Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Nov;42(4):125-30. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.11.2099. Phys Sportsmed. 2014. PMID: 25419896 - Radiation Oncology and Online Patient Education Materials: Deviating From NIH and AMA Recommendations.
Prabhu AV, Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Clump DA, Heron DE. Prabhu AV, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 1;96(3):521-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.2449. Epub 2016 Jun 25. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016. PMID: 27681748 - Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.
Williams AM, Muir KW, Rosdahl JA. Williams AM, et al. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 3;16:133. doi: 10.1186/s12886-016-0315-0. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27487960 Free PMC article. Review. - A critical review of the readability of online patient education resources from RadiologyInfo.Org.
Hansberry DR, John A, John E, Agarwal N, Gonzales SF, Baker SR. Hansberry DR, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):566-75. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11223. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014. PMID: 24555593 Review.
Cited by
- Evaluation of the quality and readability of ChatGPT responses to frequently asked questions about myopia in traditional Chinese language.
Chang LC, Sun CC, Chen TH, Tsai DC, Lin HL, Liao LL. Chang LC, et al. Digit Health. 2024 Sep 2;10:20552076241277021. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277021. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 39229462 Free PMC article. - Google Trends-Assisted Analysis of the Readability, Accountability, and Accessibility of Online Patient Education Materials for the Treatment of AMD After US FDA Approval of Pegcetacoplan.
Cohen SA, Brant A, Rayess N, Rahimy E, Pan C, Fisher AC, Pershing S, Do D. Cohen SA, et al. J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024 Apr 30;8(4):421-427. doi: 10.1177/24741264241250156. eCollection 2024 Jul-Aug. J Vitreoretin Dis. 2024. PMID: 39148568 - Readability of English, German, and Russian Disease-Related Wikipedia Pages: Automated Computational Analysis.
Gordejeva J, Zowalla R, Pobiruchin M, Wiesner M. Gordejeva J, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 16;24(5):e36835. doi: 10.2196/36835. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35576562 Free PMC article. - Patient knowledge, experiences and preferences regarding retinoblastoma and research: A qualitative study.
Moses C, Flegg K, Dimaras H. Moses C, et al. Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):632-643. doi: 10.1111/hex.13043. Epub 2020 Feb 29. Health Expect. 2020. PMID: 32113195 Free PMC article. - Assessment of online patient education materials designed for people with age-related macular degeneration.
Fortuna J, Riddering A, Shuster L, Lopez-Jeng C. Fortuna J, et al. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01664-x. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 33008367 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous