Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Alcohol-Dependent Individuals: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Alcohol-Dependent Individuals: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Philippe Laramée et al. EBioMedicine. 2015.

Abstract

Background: Alcohol dependence (AD) carries a high mortality burden, which may be mitigated by reduced alcohol consumption. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis investigating the risk of all-cause mortality in alcohol-dependent subjects.

Methods: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase and PsycINFO were searched from database conception through 26th June 2014. Eligible studies reported all-cause mortality in both alcohol-dependent subjects and a comparator population of interest. Two individuals independently reviewed studies. Of 4540 records identified, 39 observational studies were included in meta-analyses.

Findings: We identified a significant increase in mortality for alcohol-dependent subjects compared with the general population (27 studies; relative risk [RR] = 3.45; 95% CI [2.96, 4.02]; p < 0.0001). The mortality increase was also significant compared to subjects qualifying for a diagnosis of alcohol abuse or subjects without alcohol use disorders (AUDs). Alcohol-dependent subjects continuing to drink heavily had significantly greater mortality than alcohol-dependent subjects who reduced alcohol intake, even if abstainers were excluded (p < 0.05).

Interpretation: AD was found to significantly increase an individual's risk of all-cause mortality. While abstinence in alcohol-dependent subjects led to greater mortality reduction than non-abstinence, this study suggests that alcohol-dependent subjects can significantly reduce their mortality risk by reducing alcohol consumption.

Keywords: Abstinence; Alcohol dependence; Alcoholism; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

PRISMA flowchart.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses of mortality risk in a) alcohol-dependent subjects vs the general population, b) alcohol-dependent subjects vs subjects without AUDs, and c) alcohol-dependent subjects vs subjects qualifying for a diagnosis of alcohol abuse. aHR, OR, RR or SMR (depending on study); bHR, OR or RR (depending on study); cCollege cohort; dCore city cohort.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses of mortality risk in alcohol-dependent subjects with continued heavy drinking vs a) alcohol-dependent subjects who reduced their alcohol intake (excluding abstainers), b) alcohol-dependent subjects who reduced their alcohol intake (including abstainers), and c) abstinent alcohol-dependent subjects. aHR, OR or RR (depending on study).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adamson S.J., Heather N., Morton V., Raistrick D. Initial preference for drinking goal in the treatment of alcohol problems: II. Treatment outcomes. Alcohol Alcohol. (Oxford, Oxfordshire) 2010;45(2):136–142. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association . 5th ed. Author; Washington, DC: 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.
    1. Anon . StataCorp LP; College Station, TX: 2013. Stata statistical software: release 11.1 [computer program]
    1. Bell H., Orjasaeter H. Five years' follow-up of patients with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and alcoholic liver disease, with special reference to mortality rate and development of malignancy. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1983;30(4):140–142. - PubMed
    1. Berger M.L., Martin B.C., Husereau D. A questionnaire to assess the relevance and credibility of observational studies to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC good practice task force report. Value Health. 2014;17(2):143–156. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources