Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Computed Tomography-Assessed Skeletal Muscle Mass on Outcome in Patients Awaiting or Undergoing Liver Transplantation - PubMed (original) (raw)
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Aug;16(8):2277-92.
doi: 10.1111/ajt.13732. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
Affiliations
- PMID: 26813115
- DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13732
Free article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Computed Tomography-Assessed Skeletal Muscle Mass on Outcome in Patients Awaiting or Undergoing Liver Transplantation
J L A van Vugt et al. Am J Transplant. 2016 Aug.
Free article
Abstract
Liver transplant outcome has improved considerably as a direct result of optimized surgical and anesthesiological techniques and organ allocation programs. Because there remains a shortage of human organs, strict selection of transplant candidates remains of paramount importance. Recently, computed tomography (CT)-assessed low skeletal muscle mass (i.e. sarcopenia) was identified as a novel prognostic parameter to predict outcome in liver transplant candidates. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of CT-assessed skeletal muscle mass on outcome in liver transplant candidates were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Nineteen studies, including 3803 patients in partly overlapping cohorts, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 22.2% to 70%. An independent association between low muscle mass and posttransplantation and waiting list mortality was described in 4 of the 6 and 6 of the 11 studies, respectively. The pooled hazard ratios of sarcopenia were 1.84 (95% confidence interval 1.11-3.05, p = 0.02) and 1.72 (95% confidence interval 0.99-3.00, p = 0.05) for posttransplantation and waiting list mortality, respectively, independent of Model for End-stage Liver Disease score. Less-consistent evidence suggested a higher complication rate, particularly infections, in sarcopenic patients. In conclusion, sarcopenia is an independent predictor for outcome in liver transplantation patients and could be used for risk assessment.
Keywords: classification systems; clinical research/practice; comorbidities; complication; complication: infectious; diagnostic techniques and imaging: computed tomography; health services and outcomes research; liver transplantation/hepatology.
© Copyright 2016 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
Comment in
- Comparing the Variability Between Measurements for Sarcopenia Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Imaging.
Tandon P, Mourtzakis M, Low G, Zenith L, Ney M, Carbonneau M, Alaboudy A, Mann S, Esfandiari N, Ma M. Tandon P, et al. Am J Transplant. 2016 Sep;16(9):2766-7. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13832. Epub 2016 May 25. Am J Transplant. 2016. PMID: 27093434 No abstract available. - Reply to: Comparing the Variability Between Measurements for Sarcopenia Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Imaging.
van Vugt JL, Levolger S, Metselaar HJ, IJzermans JN. van Vugt JL, et al. Am J Transplant. 2016 Sep;16(9):2768. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13860. Epub 2016 Jun 9. Am J Transplant. 2016. PMID: 27151316 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical