Frailty Trajectories in an Elderly Population-Based Cohort - PubMed (original) (raw)

Frailty Trajectories in an Elderly Population-Based Cohort

Alanna M Chamberlain et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To identify distinct frailty trajectories (clusters of individuals following a similar progression of frailty over time) in an aging population and to estimate associations between frailty trajectories and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality.

Design: Population-based cohort study.

Setting: Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Participants: Olmsted County, Minnesota residents aged 60-89 in 2005.

Measurements: Longitudinal changes in frailty between 2005 and 2012 were measured by constructing a yearly Rockwood frailty index incorporating body mass index, 17 comorbidities, and 14 activities of daily living. The frailty index measures variation in health status as the proportion of deficits present of the 32 considered (range 0-1).

Results: Of the 16,443 Olmsted County residents aged 60-89 in 2005, 12,270 (74.6%) had at least 3 years of frailty index measures and were retained for analysis. The median baseline frailty index increased with age (0.11 for 60-69, 0.14 for 70-79, 0.19 for 80-89). Three distinct frailty trajectories were identified in individuals aged 60-69 at baseline and two trajectories in those aged 70-79 and 80-89. Within each decade of age, increasing frailty trajectories were associated with greater risks of emergency department visits, hospitalization, and all-cause mortality, even after adjustment for baseline frailty index.

Conclusion: The number of frailty trajectories differed according to age. Within each age group, those in the highest frailty trajectory had greater healthcare use and worse survival. Frailty trajectories may offer a way to target aging individuals at high risk of hospitalization or death for therapeutic or preventive interventions.

Keywords: aging; frailty; longitudinal studies; population research.

© 2016, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2016, The American Geriatrics Society.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Jennifer St. Sauver is a co-investigator on the Rochester Epidemiology Project (NIA AG034676). All other authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1. Frailty trajectory plots in the 60–69, 70–79, and 80–89 year old age groups

The black line indicates the lowest trajectory, the green line indicates the middle trajectory, and the red line indicates the highest trajectory. The percentage next to each trajectory indicates the proportion of individuals in that trajectory.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H. Current Population Reports. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2014. An aging nation: the older population in the United States; pp. 25–1140.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The state of aging and health in America 2013. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2013.
    1. Rockwood K, Song X, Mitnitski A. Changes in relative fitness and frailty across the adult lifespan: Evidence from the Canadian National Population Health Survey. Can Med Assoc J. 2011;183:E487–E494. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Bergman H, et al. The I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12:29–37. - PubMed
    1. Chen X, Mao G, Leng SX. Frailty syndrome: An overview. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:433–441. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources