Temporal modulation of collective cell behavior controls vascular network topology - PubMed (original) (raw)

Temporal modulation of collective cell behavior controls vascular network topology

Esther Kur et al. Elife. 2016.

Abstract

Vascular network density determines the amount of oxygen and nutrients delivered to host tissues, but how the vast diversity of densities is generated is unknown. Reiterations of endothelial-tip-cell selection, sprout extension and anastomosis are the basis for vascular network generation, a process governed by the VEGF/Notch feedback loop. Here, we find that temporal regulation of this feedback loop, a previously unexplored dimension, is the key mechanism to determine vascular density. Iterating between computational modeling and in vivo live imaging, we demonstrate that the rate of tip-cell selection determines the length of linear sprout extension at the expense of branching, dictating network density. We provide the first example of a host tissue-derived signal (Semaphorin3E-Plexin-D1) that accelerates tip cell selection rate, yielding a dense network. We propose that temporal regulation of this critical, iterative aspect of network formation could be a general mechanism, and additional temporal regulators may exist to sculpt vascular topology.

Keywords: angiogensis; computational biology; computational modeling; delta-notch; developmental biology; mouse; stem cells; systems biology; temporal regulation; tip cell; vascular topology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.

Figure 1.. Calibrated computational model predicts delayed tip cell selection in the absence of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling.

(A) Whole-mount vascular staining (Isolectin B4) of retinas from Sema3e-/- and wildtype littermates at P4. The mutant vasculature exhibits a reduced number of tip cells and branching points (asterisks) and an uneven growth front (arrows and arrowheads). Scale bar: 500 μm. (B) Feedback between the VEGF/Notch and Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling pathways included in the extended agent-based computational model of tip cell selection. D1-D4: transcriptional delays. r1-r3: recovery delays representing degradation. δ, s, σ: change in expression levels in response to receptor activation. (C) Simulated tip cell selection. Colors represent Dll4 levels on a continuum from purple (low) to green (high). The red boxes highlight a time frame in which a salt and pepper pattern has formed in the control vessel, while in the absence of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling, only few early tip cells have been selected. (D) Average number of selected tip cells in simulated vessels. At a timepoint where the simulated control vessel (black line) already exhibits an alternating pattern of tip and stalk cells, the simulated vessel lacking Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling (blue line, for a given set of parameter values: δ =5, s=3) shows a 50% reduction in tip cells. Thin lines: standard deviation. n=50. (E) In silico Dll4 levels in single endothelial cells during simulated tip cell selection. In the control situation (top), Dll4 levels quickly stabilize. In the absence of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling (bottom) Dll4 levels fluctuate in near synchrony before they finally stabilize. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13212.003

Figure 2.

Figure 2.. Sema3E-PlexinD1 signaling is cell-autonomously required to suppress tip cell identity.

(A) Simulated tip cell selection in a mosaic vessel with 50% mutant cells placed randomly. Cells without Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling are indicated by bright pink color, which turns to yellow if Dll4 levels increase. For wildtype cells: purple = low Dll4, pink = high Dll4. (B) Comparison of simulated and in vivo contribution to the tip cell population by cells lacking Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling at 45% mosaicism. A range of δ values simulates different strengths of loss of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling. Simulations, n=50, in vivo, n=6. Data is represented as mean +/- SEM. (C) Analysis of the occupation of tip or stalk cell position by Plxnd1 expressing wildtype cells in control retina (left), and Plxnd1-/- cells (middle) or GFP+ cells (right) in mosaic retinas at P5. Red: vascular membrane staining (Isolectin B4), blue: vascular nuclear staining (α-ERG), green: in situhybridization (left, middle), α-GFP staining (right). (D) Quantification of c. n.s.= not significant, **p=0.0033. WT retinas, n=6; _Plxnd1-/-_mosaic retinas, n=6; GFP+ mosaic retinas, n=4. Scale bar: 50 μm. Data is represented as mean +/- SEM. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13212.011

Figure 3.

Figure 3.. Computational simulation predicts that lack of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling leads to prolonged tip cell occupancy and reduced tip cell overtaking frequency.

(A) Single frames of cell rearrangements in simulated sprouts of 10 cells. VEGF gradient extends in direction of vessel. (B) Kymograph plots of cell rearrangements in simulated sprouts. Each line represents one endothelial cell. Arrows indicate overtaking events at the tip cell position in a and b. (C) Quantification of overtaking events at the tip cell position in the presence and absence of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling. A range of δ values simulates different strengths of loss of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling. The setting δ=5, which matched loss of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling in other conditions in the paper exhibits a 1.26 slower tip cell overtaking frequency (events/hour.) As δ increases there is a clear trend towards slower tip cell overtaking across δ values. Data is presented as mean +/- SD, n=50. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13212.013

Figure 4.

Figure 4.. Endothelial cell live tracking in ex vivo lung explants reveals a reduction in tip cell selection frequency and a less branched lung vascular network in the absence of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling.

(A) Different types of tip cell selection events observed during live imaging. (B) Single frames from live imaging experiments illustrating the different types of tip cell selection events. Arrowheads point out the newly selected tip cells. Nuclei: blue. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) Long-term live imaging experiments of vascular sprouts from wildtype and Plxnd1-/- lung explants. Single planes from z-stacks are shown. Arrowheads indicate a tip cell selection event. Nuclei: blue (top and middle), white (bottom). Individual nuclei are outlined by different colors in the middle panel. (D) Quantification of tip cell selection frequency calculated as events per hour. Tip cell selection frequency is reduced by factor 1.5 in sprouts from Plxnd1-/- explants. WT, n=24 sprouts from 12 explants. Plxnd1-/-, n=30 sprouts from 11 explants. Data is represented as mean +/- SEM. (E) Quantification of tip cell selection frequency calculated as incidence of events in each category as illustrated in (A) during total imaging time. **p=0.013 (D), *p=0.029 (e ‘switch’), 0.041 (e ‘branch, type II’), permutation test with shuffled genotypes. (F) Vascular sprouts originating from Plxnd1+/- and Plxnd1-/- lung explants on day 3. Left: whole-mount vascular staining (green, PECAM), right: reconstructed/skeletonized network, Scale bar: 250 μm. (G) Quantification of branching points per area. The number of branching points is significantly reduced in Plxnd1-/- lung explants. Data is represented as mean +/- SEM. Plxnd1+/-, n=7 explants; Plxnd1-/-, n=6 explants. ***p=0.0005, permutation test with shuffled genotypes. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13212.016

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.. The ex vivo sprouting assay.

(A) Sprouts originating from the lung explant express endothelial specific marker PECAM. Explants at day 1 (left) and day 3 (right) are shown. Scale bar: 300 μm. (B) Tip cells extend filopodia (arrows) into the collagen matrix. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) Anastomosis: a new connection (arrow) is formed between neighboring sprouts. Scale bar: 50 μm (D) Sema3e and Plxnd1 are expressed by embryonic lung explants as shown by RT PCR. (E) Sprouting endothelial cells express Plexin-D1 (green). PECAM staining shown in red. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) In wildtype endothelial sprout Dll4 (green) localized in the tip cells (arrow). Dll4-positive area is increased in Plxnd1-/- explants. Scale bar: 10 µm. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13212.017

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.. Computational method used for vascular network analysis.

The region of interest (ROI) was defined as the vascular network originating from the lung explants. Vasculature inside the lung tissue was excluded from the analysis. Stacks of confocal images were binarized and then skeletonized by thinning. Branching points were identified as skeleton pixels with at least three neighbors and quantified to characterize the vascular network. The 2D images shown are the maximum intensity z-projections of the original 3D stacks, except for the binary image, which is an intensity sum z-projection. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13212.018

Figure 4—figure supplement 3.

Figure 4—figure supplement 3.. Model: Modifications of the central pattern generator lead to the formation of diverse vascular topologies.

The unique topologies of organ-specific vascular networks are dependent on the tight temporal control of the tip cell selection process. The VEGF-Notch lateral inhibition pathway is the central pattern generator of tip cell selection. We suggest that in different tissues, specific target-derived signals functioning as 'molecular metronomes' regulate the pace of the pattern generator to ensure the formation of networks that cater each tissue’s specific need. A 'fast molecular metronome' (e.g. Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling) will speed up the Dll4/Notch feedback loop and increase the frequency of tip cell selection, leading to the formation of a dense network with a small pore size, while a 'slow molecular metronome' will slow down the Dll4/Notch feedback loop and decrease the tip cell selection frequency, resulting in a network with larger pore sizes. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13212.019

References

    1. Adams RH, Eichmann A. Axon Guidance Molecules in Vascular Patterning. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2010;2:a001875. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001875. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arima S, Nishiyama K, Ko T, Arima Y, Hakozaki Y, Sugihara K, Koseki H, Uchijima Y, Kurihara Y, Kurihara H. Angiogenic morphogenesis driven by dynamic and heterogeneous collective endothelial cell movement. Development. 2011;138:4763–4776. doi: 10.1242/dev.068023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aulehla A, Pourquié O. Oscillating signaling pathways during embryonic development. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2008;20:632–637. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benedito R, Roca C, Sörensen I, Adams S, Gossler A, Fruttiger M, Adams RH. The Notch Ligands Dll4 and Jagged1 Have Opposing Effects on Angiogenesis. Cell. 2009;137:1124–1135. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bentley K, Franco CA, Philippides A, Blanco R, Dierkes M, Gebala V, Stanchi F, Jones M, Aspalter IM, Cagna G, Weström S, Claesson-Welsh L, Vestweber D, Gerhardt H. The role of differential VE-cadherin dynamics in cell rearrangement during angiogenesis. Nature Cell Biology. 2014a;16:309–321. doi: 10.1038/ncb2926. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources