Intrauterine systems: a frameless future? - PubMed (original) (raw)
Review
Intrauterine systems: a frameless future?
Dirk Wildemeersch et al. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016 Jun.
Abstract
Introduction: Intrauterine devices (IUD) are viewed as important contraceptive methodologies to prevent unintended pregnancy.
Areas covered: This expert opinion examines the place of frameless devices for use in young women in order to minimize side effect, improve patient comfort and maximize continuation of use to help reduce unintended pregnancies.
Expert opinion: Frameless designed IUDs have the ability to be used in both small and large uterine cavities of varied shapes and can significantly reduce abnormal bleeding, pain, embedment and expulsion and likely account for higher continuation rates than that seen with framed IUDs.
Keywords: Continuation of use; Copper IUD; framed IUD; frameless IUD; hormone-releasing IUD; side effects; unintended pregnancy.
Similar articles
- Expulsion and continuation rates after postabortion insertion of framed IUDs versus frameless IUDs - review of the literature.
Wildemeersch D, Goldstuck ND. Wildemeersch D, et al. Open Access J Contracept. 2015 Jul 9;6:87-94. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S87607. eCollection 2015. Open Access J Contracept. 2015. PMID: 29386926 Free PMC article. - Precision intrauterine contraception may significantly increase continuation of use: a review of long-term clinical experience with frameless copper-releasing intrauterine contraception devices.
Wildemeersch D, Pett A, Jandi S, Hasskamp T, Rowe P, Vrijens M. Wildemeersch D, et al. Int J Womens Health. 2013 Apr 30;5:215-25. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S42784. Print 2013. Int J Womens Health. 2013. PMID: 23658502 Free PMC article. - Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD. Heinemann K, et al. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):280-3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 16. Contraception. 2015. PMID: 25601350 Clinical Trial. - Intrauterine Contraception Continuation in Adolescents and Young Women: A Systematic Review.
Usinger KM, Gola SB, Weis M, Smaldone A. Usinger KM, et al. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Dec;29(6):659-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jul 4. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27386754 Review. - The 'frameless' intrauterine system for long-term, reversible contraception: a review of 15 years of clinical experience.
Wildemeersch D, Batár I, Affandi B, Andrade A, Shangchun W, Jing H, Xiaoming C. Wildemeersch D, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2003 Jun;29(3):164-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1341-8076.2003.00095.x. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2003. PMID: 12841701 Review.
Cited by
- New developments in intrauterine device use: focus on the US.
Nelson AL, Massoudi N. Nelson AL, et al. Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Sep 13;7:127-141. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S85755. eCollection 2016. Open Access J Contracept. 2016. PMID: 29386944 Free PMC article. Review. - Chronic Systemic Toxicity Study of Copper Intrauterine Devices in Female Wistar Rats.
Zhao X, Liu Q, Sun H, Hu Y, Wang Z. Zhao X, et al. Med Sci Monit. 2017 Aug 16;23:3961-3970. doi: 10.12659/msm.902137. Med Sci Monit. 2017. PMID: 28813370 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources