A Sociotechnical Framework for Governing Climate Engineering - PubMed (original) (raw)

A Sociotechnical Framework for Governing Climate Engineering

Rob Bellamy. Sci Technol Human Values. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Proposed ways of governing climate engineering have most often been supported by narrowly framed and unreflexive appraisals and processes. This article explores the governance implications of a Deliberative Mapping project that, unlike other governance principles, have emerged from an extensive process of reflection and reflexivity. In turn, the project has made significant advances in addressing the current deficit of responsibly defined criteria for shaping governance propositions. Three such propositions argue that (1) reflexive foresight of the imagined futures in which climate engineering proposals might reside is required; (2) the performance and acceptance of climate engineering proposals should be decided in terms of robustness, not optimality; and (3) climate engineering proposals should be satisfactorily opened up before they can be considered legitimate objects of governance. Taken together, these propositions offer a sociotechnical framework not simply for governing climate engineering but for governing responses to climate change at large.

Keywords: appraisal; engagement; governance; intervention; politics; power.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Arthur W. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events.” Economic Journal 99 (394): 116–31.
    1. Barben D., Fisher E., Selin C., Guston D. 2008. “Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement and Integration” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed, edited by Hackett E., Lynch M., Wajcman J., 979–1000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    1. Barrett S. 2008. “The Incredible Economics of Geoengineering.” Environmental and Resource Economics 39 (1): 45–54.
    1. Bellamy R. 2013. “Framing Geoengineering Assessment.” Opinion article, Geoengineering our Climate Working Paper and Opinion Article Series. Accessed May 2, 2015 wp.me/p2zsRk-9H.
    1. Bellamy R., Chilvers J., Vaughan N., Lenton T. 2012. “A Review of Climate Geoengineering Appraisals.” WIREs Climate Change 3 (6): 597–615.

LinkOut - more resources