The Impact of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Health and Health Care Costs: A Modelling Study - PubMed (original) (raw)
The Impact of a Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages on Health and Health Care Costs: A Modelling Study
J Lennert Veerman et al. PLoS One. 2016.
Abstract
This paper aims to estimate the consequences of an additional 20% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) on health and health care expenditure. Participants were adult (aged > = 20) Australians alive in 2010, who were modelled over their remaining lifetime. We used lifetable-based epidemiological modelling to examine the potential impact of a 20% valoric tax on SSBs on total lifetime disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), incidence, prevalence, and mortality of obesity-related disease, and health care expenditure. Over the lifetime of adult Australian alive in 2010, seemingly modest estimated changes in average body mass as a result of the SSB tax translated to gains of 112,000 health-adjusted life years for men (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 73,000-155,000) and 56,000 (95% UI: 36,000-76,000) for women, and a reduction in overall health care expenditure of AUD609 million (95% UI: 368 million- 870 million). The tax is estimated to reduce the number of new type 2 diabetes cases by approximately 800 per year. Twenty-five years after the introduction of the tax, there would be 4,400 fewer prevalent cases of heart disease and 1,100 fewer persons living with the consequences of stroke, and an estimated 1606 extra people would be alive as a result of the tax. The tax would generate an estimated AUD400 million in revenue each year. Governments should consider increasing the tax on sugared drinks. This would improve population health, reduce health care costs, as well as bring in direct revenue.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: Two of the authors (JM, NA) are employed by the Obesity Policy Coalition.
Figures
Similar articles
- The impact on productivity of a hypothetical tax on sugar-sweetened beverages.
Nomaguchi T, Cunich M, Zapata-Diomedi B, Veerman JL. Nomaguchi T, et al. Health Policy. 2017 Jun;121(6):715-725. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 7. Health Policy. 2017. PMID: 28420538 - Projected Impact of Mexico's Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policy on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Modeling Study.
Sánchez-Romero LM, Penko J, Coxson PG, Fernández A, Mason A, Moran AE, Ávila-Burgos L, Odden M, Barquera S, Bibbins-Domingo K. Sánchez-Romero LM, et al. PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 1;13(11):e1002158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002158. eCollection 2016 Nov. PLoS Med. 2016. PMID: 27802278 Free PMC article. - Modelled health benefits of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in Australia: A cost-effectiveness and equity analysis.
Lal A, Mantilla-Herrera AM, Veerman L, Backholer K, Sacks G, Moodie M, Siahpush M, Carter R, Peeters A. Lal A, et al. PLoS Med. 2017 Jun 27;14(6):e1002326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002326. eCollection 2017 Jun. PLoS Med. 2017. PMID: 28654688 Free PMC article. - Cost Effectiveness of a Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Excise Tax in the U.S.
Long MW, Gortmaker SL, Ward ZJ, Resch SC, Moodie ML, Sacks G, Swinburn BA, Carter RC, Claire Wang Y. Long MW, et al. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):112-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.004. Am J Prev Med. 2015. PMID: 26094232 Free PMC article. Review. - The taxation of unhealthy energy-dense foods (EDFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): An overview of patterns observed in the policy content and policy context of 13 case studies.
Hagenaars LL, Jeurissen PPT, Klazinga NS. Hagenaars LL, et al. Health Policy. 2017 Aug;121(8):887-894. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Health Policy. 2017. PMID: 28711301 Review.
Cited by
- Cost-effectiveness of tax policies on promoting sustainable diets in Iran: a modeling study.
Mokari-Yamchi A, Omidvar N, Karami M, Tahamipour Zarandi M, Eini-Zinab H. Mokari-Yamchi A, et al. Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 21;11:1453969. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1453969. eCollection 2024. Front Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39498406 Free PMC article. - Modeling and empirical evidence of the impact of implementation of sugar sweetened-beverages tax to reduce non-communicable diseases prevalence: a systematic review.
Firdaus S, Andarwulan N, Hariyadi P. Firdaus S, et al. Front Nutr. 2024 Oct 11;11:1448300. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1448300. eCollection 2024. Front Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39464684 Free PMC article. - Modelling the potential impact of a tax on fruit juice in South Africa: implications for the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes and health financing.
Boachie MK, Hofman K, Goldstein S, Thsehla E. Boachie MK, et al. BMC Nutr. 2024 Oct 25;10(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40795-024-00941-y. BMC Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39456097 Free PMC article. - The implications of policy modeling assumptions for the projected impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation on body weight and type 2 diabetes in Germany.
Emmert-Fees KMF, Felea A, Staudigel M, Ananthapavan J, Laxy M. Emmert-Fees KMF, et al. BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 27;24(1):2013. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19488-5. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39068431 Free PMC article. - Estimated reductions in type 2 diabetes burden through nutrition policies in AZAR cohort population: A PRIME microsimulation study for primary health care.
Pourmoradian S, Kalantari N, Eini-Zinab H, Ostadrahimi A, Tabrizi JS, Faramarzi E. Pourmoradian S, et al. Health Promot Perspect. 2024 Mar 14;14(1):53-60. doi: 10.34172/hpp.42452. eCollection 2024 Mar. Health Promot Perspect. 2024. PMID: 38623351 Free PMC article.
References
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Burden of Disease Country Profile Australia. Seattle (WA, USA): 2013.
- World Health Organization. 2008–2013 Action plan for the global strategy for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases Geneva: WHO, 2008.
- WHO Regional Office for Europe. Using price policies to promote healthier diets. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
This work was supported by the Obesity Policy Coalition and by NHMRC funding for the Centre for Research Excellence in Obesity Policy and Food Systems (APP1041020). GS is the recipient of an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (project number DE160100307). Two of the authors (JM, NA) are employed by the Obesity Policy Coalition. The NHMRC was not involved in the study or the reporting.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources