Ranking Predatory Journals: Solve the Problem Instead of Removing It! - PubMed (original) (raw)

Ranking Predatory Journals: Solve the Problem Instead of Removing It!

Mehdi Dadkhah et al. Adv Pharm Bull. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Predatory journals are a well-known issue for scholarly publishing and they are repositories for bogus research. In recent years, the number of predatory journals has risen and it is necessary to present a solution for this challenge. In this paper, we will discuss about a possible ranking of predatory journals. Our ranking approach is based on Beall's criteria for detection of predatory journals and it can help editors to improve their journals or convert their questionable journals to non-predatory ones. Moreover, our approach could help young editors to protect their journals against predatory practice. Finally, we present a case study to clarify our approach.

Keywords: Academic ethic; Journal quality; Journal selection; Predatory journal criteria; Predatory journals; Ranking predatory journals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beall J. Update: Predatory Open-Access Scholarly Publishers. Charleston Advis. 2010;12(1):10–17. doi: 10.5260/chara.12.1.50. - DOI
    1. Beall J. Medical publishing triage - chronicling predatory open access publishers. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2013;2(2):47–9. doi: 10.1016/S2049-0801(13)70035-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark J, Smith R. Firm action needed on predatory journals. BMJ. 2015;350:h210. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Srivastava A. You are invited to submit. BMC Med. 2015;13:180. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0423-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lukić T, Blešić I, Basarin B, Bibić IL, Milošević D, Sakulski D. Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers-a global outbreak with rising trend: a review. Geogr Pannonica. 2014;18(3):69–81.

LinkOut - more resources