The Extent and Distribution of Gambling-Related Harms and the Prevention Paradox in a British Population Survey - PubMed (original) (raw)

Natale Canale et al. J Behav Addict. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives To examine whether the "prevention paradox" applies to British individuals in relation to gambling-related harm. Methods Data were derived from 7,756 individuals participating in the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010, a comprehensive interview-based survey conducted in Great Britain between November 2009 and May 2010. Gambling-related harm was assessed using an adapted version of the DSM-IV Pathological Gambling criteria. The previous year's prevalence of problem gamblers was examined using the Problem Gambling Severity Index. Gambling involvement was measured by gambling frequency and gambling participation (gambling volume as expressed by time and money spent gambling). Results The prevalence rates for past-year gambling harms were dependence harm (16.4%), social harm (2.2%), and chasing losses (7.9%). Gambling-related harms were distributed across low- to moderate-risk gamblers (and not limited to just problem gamblers) and were reported by the majority of gamblers who were non-high time and spend regular gamblers than high time and spend regular gamblers. Conclusions The prevention paradox is a promising way of examining gambling-related harm. This suggests that prevention of gambling might need to consider the population approach to minimizing gambling harm.

Keywords: Great Britain; gambling; gambling involvement; harms; population studies; prevention paradox.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott M., Binde P., Hodgins D., Korn D., Pereira A., Volberg R., Williams R. (2013). Conceptual framework of harmful gambling: An International Collaboration. Guelph, Ontario: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
    1. Auer M., Griffiths M. D. (2013). Limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: An empirical study of online gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 647–660. doi:<10.1007/s10899-012-9332-y> - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blaszczynski A. (2009). Problem gambling: We should measure harm rather than ‘cases’. Addiction, 104, 1072–1074. doi:<10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02505.x> - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

Funding sources: None.

LinkOut - more resources