The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

. 2016 Dec;31(12):2841-2855.

doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew218. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

Affiliations

Review

The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gurkan Bozdag et al. Hum Reprod. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Study question: What is the reported overall prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) according to the criteria of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rotterdam or the Androgen Excess and PCOS Society (AE-PCOS Society)?

Summary answer: The reported overall prevalence of PCOS (95% CI) according to diagnostic criteria of the NIH, Rotterdam and the AE-PCOS Society is 6% (5-8%, n = 18 trials), 10% (8-13%, n = 15 trials) and 10% (7-13%, n = 10 trials), respectively.

What is already known: PCOS is the most common endocrine disorder among women of reproductive age. Although many studies have investigated the prevalence of PCOS, there are discrepancies in their results, in part due to the use of various definitions of the syndrome and its subphenotypes, differences between study cohorts, ethnicities, and types of recruitment and sampling.

Study design, size, duration: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on all published studies that have reported the prevalence of PCOS according to at least one subset of diagnostic criteria.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: To identify relevant studies based on the PRISMA statement, PubMed and Ovid databases were searched up to September 2015 by two blind investigators using the terms 'PCOS', 'polycystic ovarian disease', 'Stein Leventhal syndrome', 'Androgen Excess Society', 'National Institute of Health', 'Rotterdam', 'ESHRE/ASRM', 'criteria' and 'prevalence'. Articles that represented the prevalence of PCOS according to at least one subset of diagnostic criteria were included. Exclusion criteria were a focus on adolescent subjects, an absence of data on prevalence, inappropriate design or non-English reporting. An appraisal tool to evaluate the methodological quality of the available studies was generated by the authors.

Main results and the role of chance: A total of 55 reports remained following screening of the abstracts and text for the subject of the study. Of these, 24 articles were eligible and evaluated for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Since heterogeneity was observed among studies, a random-effects model was used to estimate the prevalence and its 95% CI. The proportions of PCOS prevalence (95% CI) according to the diagnostic criteria of NIH, Rotterdam and AE-PCOS Society were 6% (5-8%, n = 18 trials), 10% (8-13%, n = 15 trials) and 10% (7-13%, n = 10 trials), respectively. When only unselected population studies were included, the given rates were 6% (5-8%, n = 3 trials), 9% (7-12%, n = 6 trials) and 10% (7-14%, n = 3 trials). The respective proportions for hirsutism, hyperandrogenaemia, polycystic ovaries (PCO) and oligo-anovulation were 13% (8-20%, n = 14 trials), 11% (8-15%, n = 9 trials), 28% (22-35%, n = 12 trials) and 15% (12-18%, n = 19 trials), respectively.

Limitations, reasons for caution: The effects of ethnic differences, particularly, on the presence or severity of hirsutism cannot be ruled out in any way. In addition, there was a lack of standardization in defining phenotypes of the syndrome and selection bias was evident in most of the studies regarding recruitment of the cohorts.

Wider implications of the findings: Geographical differences in frequencies of the components of the syndrome, such as oligo-anovulation and clinical/biochemical androgen excess, must be taken into account in the development and implementation of regional diagnostic and precision treatment strategies. Further efforts and resources are required to increase standardization of the methods and comparability of the study results on prevalence and phenotypic characterization of PCOS around the globe.

Study funding/competing interests: No funding to declare. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Registration number: None.

Keywords: androgen excess; oligo-anovulation; phenotype; polycystic ovary syndrome; prevalence.

© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources