Molecular Evolution of Human Coronavirus Genomes - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Molecular Evolution of Human Coronavirus Genomes

Diego Forni et al. Trends Microbiol. 2017 Jan.

Abstract

Human coronaviruses (HCoVs), including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, are zoonotic pathogens that originated in wild animals. HCoVs have large genomes that encode a fixed array of structural and nonstructural components, as well as a variety of accessory proteins that differ in number and sequence even among closely related CoVs. Thus, in addition to recombination and mutation, HCoV genomes evolve through gene gains and losses. In this review we summarize recent findings on the molecular evolution of HCoV genomes, with special attention to recombination and adaptive events that generated new viral species and contributed to host shifts and to HCoV emergence. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Keywords: gene gain/loss; host shift; human coronavirus; molecular evolution; positive selection; recombination.

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Key Figure: Phylogenetic Relationships and Genome Organization of Human and Animal Coronaviruses (CoVs) CoVs that infect nonhuman mammals are included only if they are mentioned in the text for comparative purposes. (A) The phylogenetic tree of complete genome sequences of HCoVs and selected mammalian CoVs was obtained with RAxML 8.2.4 . Numbers indicate bootstrap support. CoVs are colored according to genus and lineage. Information about origin, intermediate host, and clinical presentation is reported for the six HCoVs , , , , , . Data about case fatality rate were derived from the World Health Organization website (

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/mers-cov/;http://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/table2004\_04\_21/en/

). (B) CoV genome organization is schematically reported together with information on receptor/coreceptor usage. Virus names are colored according to their genus or lineage, as in (A). Only ORFs mentioned in the text are colored or shaded. Empty boxes represent accessory ORFs that are not described in the text.

Figure I

Figure I

Timeline for the Emergence of HCoVs.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Evolution of Human Coronavirus (HCoV) Accessory Proteins.(A) Test for relaxation of selective strength for SARS-CoV and SARSr-BatCoVs ORF8. Branches are colored according to the selection intensity parameter k. RELAX evaluates if selection on the test branches (bold) is relaxed (k < 1) or intensified (_k_ > 1) compared to background branches. In the evolutionary analysis table the number of sequences differs from that in the tree because RELAX removes identical sequences. Evidence of positive selection was searched for using the M7/M8 ‘site models’ from PAML (see Box 2) and with PARRIS. M7 and M8 represent the null and the positive selection models, respectively. A likelihood ratio test (with 2 degrees of freedom) was applied. (B) An amino acid alignment of rodent AKAP7 and four viral phosphodiesterases (PDEs) is shown. Amino acids are colored red if they are identical, orange if they have very similar properties. PDEs belonging to the 2H family are characterized by two H-Φ-[S/T]-Φ motifs (blue boxes), where Φ is a hydrophobic residue. The structure of rat AKAP7 (gray, PDB ID: 2VFK) is superimposed on MERS-CoV NS4b (green, model generated from 2VFK), MHV NS2a (cyan, PDB ID: 4Z5V), and Rotavirus A VP3 (yellow, PDB ID: 5AF2). Catalytic histidines are shown in red. (C) Sequence and membrane topology comparison of HCoV viroporins. Transmembrane regions (TM1-3) predicted by the TMHMM algorithm are boxed in blue. The corresponding topology model for SARS-CoV ORF3A, HCoV-229E ORF4a (from the Inf-1 strain), and HCoV-NL63 ORF3 is shown. The topology model of HCoV-OC43 OFR5 was derived from recent data .

Figure 3

Figure 3

Evolution at the Coronavirus (CoV)–Host Interaction Surface.(A) Schematic representation of MERS-CoV spike protein domains. Positively selected sites in MERS-CoV and other lineage C beta-CoVs are shown in red, RBD mutations emerged in the South Korean outbreak are in magenta (see text). A detail of the interaction surface between the MERS-CoV RBD and human DPP4 (PDB ID: 4F5C) is also reported. (B) Ribbon diagram of the interaction surface of human ACE2 with the spike protein of SARS-CoV (PDB ID: 2AJF) and HCoV-NL63 (PDB ID: 3KBH). The binding surface of porcine ANPEP with the TGEV spike protein (PDB ID: 4F5C) is also shown. The location of the HCoV-299E binding site on ANPEP is circled. Red denotes protein regions involved in binding.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Graham R.L. A decade after SARS: strategies for controlling emerging coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;11:836–848. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lau S.K. Discovery of a novel coronavirus, China Rattus coronavirus HKU24, from Norway rats supports the murine origin of Betacoronavirus 1 and has implications for the ancestor of Betacoronavirus lineage A. J. Virol. 2015;89:3076–3092. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan J.F. Interspecies transmission and emergence of novel viruses: lessons from bats and birds. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:544–555. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drexler J.F. Ecology, evolution and classification of bat coronaviruses in the aftermath of SARS. Antiviral Res. 2014;101:45–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Su S. Epidemiology, genetic recombination, and pathogenesis of coronaviruses. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:490–502. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources