Limitations in Activities of Daily Living in Community-Dwelling People Aged 75 and Over: A Systematic Literature Review of Risk and Protective Factors - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Limitations in Activities of Daily Living in Community-Dwelling People Aged 75 and Over: A Systematic Literature Review of Risk and Protective Factors

Anne van der Vorst et al. PLoS One. 2016.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Most older people wish to age in place, for which functional status or being able to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) is an important precondition. However, along with the substantial growth of the (oldest) old, the number of people who develop limitations in ADLs or have functional decline dramatically increases in this part of the population. Therefore, it is important to gain insight into factors that can contribute to developing intervention strategies at older ages. As a first step, this systematic review was conducted to identify risk and protective factors as predictors for developing limitations in ADLs in community-dwelling people aged 75 and over.

Methods: Four electronic databases (CINAHL (EBSCO), EMBASE, PsycINFO and PubMed) were searched systematically for potentially relevant studies published between January 1998 and March 2016.

Results: After a careful selection process, 6,910 studies were identified and 25 were included. By far most factors were examined in one study only, and most were considered risk factors. Several factors do not seem to be able to predict the development of limitations in ADLs in people aged 75 years and over, and for some factors ambiguous associations were found. The following risk factors were found in at least two studies: higher age, female gender, diabetes, hypertension, and stroke. A high level of physical activity and being married were protective in multiple studies. Notwithstanding the fact that research in people aged 65 years and over is more extensive, risk and protective factors seem to differ between the 'younger' and 'older' olds.

Conclusion: Only a few risk and protective factors in community-dwelling people aged 75 years and over have been analysed in multiple studies. However, the identified factors could serve both detection and prevention purposes, and implications for future research are given as well.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1

Fig 1. PRISMA flowchart.

Figure credited from: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:

10.1371/journal.pmed1000097

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Commission. The 2015 Aging Report. 2014. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2014/p...
    1. Walker A, Maltby T. Active aging: A strategic policy solution to demographic aging in the European Union. Int J Soc Welf. 2012; 21: 117–30.
    1. WHO. Active aging: a policy framework. 2001a. Available: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/67215/1/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf
    1. European Council. Council conclusions on active aging. 3019th Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council meeting, Luxembourg, 7 June 2010.
    1. Scharlach A. Creating Aging-Friendly Communities in the United States. Aging Int, 2011; 37(1): 25–38.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

This work is part of the D-SCOPE project, which is supported by the Flemish government Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology, and is embedded in the Strategic Basic Research (IWT-140027-SBO). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources