Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact - PubMed (original) (raw)
. 2016 Nov 4;354(6312):aaf5239.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5239.
Affiliations
- PMID: 27811240
- DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf5239
Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact
Roberta Sinatra et al. Science. 2016.
Abstract
Despite the frequent use of numerous quantitative indicators to gauge the professional impact of a scientist, little is known about how scientific impact emerges and evolves in time. Here, we quantify the changes in impact and productivity throughout a career in science, finding that impact, as measured by influential publications, is distributed randomly within a scientist's sequence of publications. This random-impact rule allows us to formulate a stochastic model that uncouples the effects of productivity, individual ability, and luck and unveils the existence of universal patterns governing the emergence of scientific success. The model assigns a unique individual parameter Q to each scientist, which is stable during a career, and it accurately predicts the evolution of a scientist's impact, from the h-index to cumulative citations, and independent recognitions, such as prizes.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Similar articles
- Statistical regularities in the rank-citation profile of scientists.
Petersen AM, Stanley HE, Succi S. Petersen AM, et al. Sci Rep. 2011;1:181. doi: 10.1038/srep00181. Epub 2011 Dec 5. Sci Rep. 2011. PMID: 22355696 Free PMC article. - Predicting scholars' scientific impact.
Mazloumian A. Mazloumian A. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049246. Epub 2012 Nov 21. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23185311 Free PMC article. - [Impact factor and/or Hirsch index?].
Gracza T, Somoskövi I. Gracza T, et al. Orv Hetil. 2007 May 6;148(18):849-52. doi: 10.1556/OH.2007.27942. Orv Hetil. 2007. PMID: 17468068 Hungarian. - Giving Credit Where Credit's Due: Why It's So Hard to Do in Psychological Science.
Simonton DK. Simonton DK. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Nov;11(6):888-892. doi: 10.1177/1745691616660155. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27899731 Review. - What makes a good scientist? Karl Fent as an example.
Sumpter JP. Sumpter JP. J Hazard Mater. 2019 Aug 15;376:233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 11. J Hazard Mater. 2019. PMID: 31150915 Review.
Cited by
- Mid-career pitfall of consecutive success in science.
Higashide N, Miura T, Tomokiyo Y, Asatani K, Sakata I. Higashide N, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 15;14(1):28172. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77206-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39548143 Free PMC article. - Science of science: A multidisciplinary field studying science.
Krauss A. Krauss A. Heliyon. 2024 Aug 13;10(17):e36066. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36066. eCollection 2024 Sep 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39296115 Free PMC article. - Individual and team performance in cricket.
Sadekar O, Chowdhary S, Santhanam MS, Battiston F. Sadekar O, et al. R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 17;11(7):240809. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240809. eCollection 2024 Jul. R Soc Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 39021766 Free PMC article. - Trajectories of biomedical research leading to Nobel Prize-winning discoveries.
Burnett WJ, Balas EA, Heboyan V, Matthews KRW. Burnett WJ, et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024 Jun;1536(1):177-187. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15154. Epub 2024 Jun 5. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024. PMID: 38837420 - Productive scientists are associated with lower disruption in scientific publishing.
Li H, Tessone CJ, Zeng A. Li H, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 21;121(21):e2322462121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322462121. Epub 2024 May 17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 38758699 Free PMC article.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources